Cargando…

Cost analysis of the CTLB Study, a multitherapy antenatal education programme to reduce routine interventions in labour

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the multitherapy antenatal education ‘CTLB’ (Complementary Therapies for Labour and Birth) Study programme leads to net cost savings. DESIGN: Cost analysis of the CTLB Study, using analysis of outcomes and hospital funding data. METHODS: We take a payer perspective and u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levett, Kate M, Dahlen, Hannah G, Smith, Caroline A, Finlayson, Kenneth William, Downe, Soo, Girosi, Federico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017333
_version_ 1783302892376031232
author Levett, Kate M
Dahlen, Hannah G
Smith, Caroline A
Finlayson, Kenneth William
Downe, Soo
Girosi, Federico
author_facet Levett, Kate M
Dahlen, Hannah G
Smith, Caroline A
Finlayson, Kenneth William
Downe, Soo
Girosi, Federico
author_sort Levett, Kate M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the multitherapy antenatal education ‘CTLB’ (Complementary Therapies for Labour and Birth) Study programme leads to net cost savings. DESIGN: Cost analysis of the CTLB Study, using analysis of outcomes and hospital funding data. METHODS: We take a payer perspective and use Australian Refined Diagnosis-Related Group (AR-DRG) cost data to estimate the potential savings per woman to the payer (government or private insurer). We consider scenarios in which the intervention cost is either borne by the woman or by the payer. Savings are computed as the difference in total cost between the control group and the study group. RESULTS: If the cost of the intervention is not borne by the payer, the average saving to the payer was calculated to be $A808 per woman. If the payer covers the cost of the programme, this figure reduces to $A659 since the average cost of delivering the programme was $A149 per woman. All these findings are significant at the 95% confidence level. Significantly more women in the study group experienced a normal vaginal birth, and significantly fewer women in the study group experienced a caesarean section. The main cost saving resulted from the reduced rate of caesarean section in the study group. CONCLUSION: The CTLB antenatal education programme leads to significant savings to payers that come from reduced use of hospital resources. Depending on which perspective is considered, and who is responsible for covering the cost of the programme, the net savings vary from $A659 to $A808 per woman. Compared with the average cost of birth in the control group, we conclude that the programme could lead to a reduction in birth-related healthcare costs of approximately 9%. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611001126909.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5829839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58298392018-03-01 Cost analysis of the CTLB Study, a multitherapy antenatal education programme to reduce routine interventions in labour Levett, Kate M Dahlen, Hannah G Smith, Caroline A Finlayson, Kenneth William Downe, Soo Girosi, Federico BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the multitherapy antenatal education ‘CTLB’ (Complementary Therapies for Labour and Birth) Study programme leads to net cost savings. DESIGN: Cost analysis of the CTLB Study, using analysis of outcomes and hospital funding data. METHODS: We take a payer perspective and use Australian Refined Diagnosis-Related Group (AR-DRG) cost data to estimate the potential savings per woman to the payer (government or private insurer). We consider scenarios in which the intervention cost is either borne by the woman or by the payer. Savings are computed as the difference in total cost between the control group and the study group. RESULTS: If the cost of the intervention is not borne by the payer, the average saving to the payer was calculated to be $A808 per woman. If the payer covers the cost of the programme, this figure reduces to $A659 since the average cost of delivering the programme was $A149 per woman. All these findings are significant at the 95% confidence level. Significantly more women in the study group experienced a normal vaginal birth, and significantly fewer women in the study group experienced a caesarean section. The main cost saving resulted from the reduced rate of caesarean section in the study group. CONCLUSION: The CTLB antenatal education programme leads to significant savings to payers that come from reduced use of hospital resources. Depending on which perspective is considered, and who is responsible for covering the cost of the programme, the net savings vary from $A659 to $A808 per woman. Compared with the average cost of birth in the control group, we conclude that the programme could lead to a reduction in birth-related healthcare costs of approximately 9%. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611001126909. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5829839/ /pubmed/29439002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017333 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Economics
Levett, Kate M
Dahlen, Hannah G
Smith, Caroline A
Finlayson, Kenneth William
Downe, Soo
Girosi, Federico
Cost analysis of the CTLB Study, a multitherapy antenatal education programme to reduce routine interventions in labour
title Cost analysis of the CTLB Study, a multitherapy antenatal education programme to reduce routine interventions in labour
title_full Cost analysis of the CTLB Study, a multitherapy antenatal education programme to reduce routine interventions in labour
title_fullStr Cost analysis of the CTLB Study, a multitherapy antenatal education programme to reduce routine interventions in labour
title_full_unstemmed Cost analysis of the CTLB Study, a multitherapy antenatal education programme to reduce routine interventions in labour
title_short Cost analysis of the CTLB Study, a multitherapy antenatal education programme to reduce routine interventions in labour
title_sort cost analysis of the ctlb study, a multitherapy antenatal education programme to reduce routine interventions in labour
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017333
work_keys_str_mv AT levettkatem costanalysisofthectlbstudyamultitherapyantenataleducationprogrammetoreduceroutineinterventionsinlabour
AT dahlenhannahg costanalysisofthectlbstudyamultitherapyantenataleducationprogrammetoreduceroutineinterventionsinlabour
AT smithcarolinea costanalysisofthectlbstudyamultitherapyantenataleducationprogrammetoreduceroutineinterventionsinlabour
AT finlaysonkennethwilliam costanalysisofthectlbstudyamultitherapyantenataleducationprogrammetoreduceroutineinterventionsinlabour
AT downesoo costanalysisofthectlbstudyamultitherapyantenataleducationprogrammetoreduceroutineinterventionsinlabour
AT girosifederico costanalysisofthectlbstudyamultitherapyantenataleducationprogrammetoreduceroutineinterventionsinlabour