Cargando…

Risk factors for difficult peripheral venous cannulation in hospitalised patients. Protocol for a multicentre case–control study in 48 units of eight public hospitals in Spain

INTRODUCTION: Patients with difficult venous access experience undesirable effects during healthcare, such as delayed diagnosis and initiation of treatment, stress and pain related to the technique and reduced satisfaction. This study aims to identify risk factors with which to model the appearance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodriguez-Calero, Miguel Angel, Fernandez-Fernandez, Ismael, Molero-Ballester, Luis Javier, Matamalas-Massanet, Catalina, Moreno-Mejias, Luis, de Pedro-Gomez, Joan Ernest, Blanco-Mavillard, Ian, Morales-Asencio, Jose Miguel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020420
_version_ 1783302904741888000
author Rodriguez-Calero, Miguel Angel
Fernandez-Fernandez, Ismael
Molero-Ballester, Luis Javier
Matamalas-Massanet, Catalina
Moreno-Mejias, Luis
de Pedro-Gomez, Joan Ernest
Blanco-Mavillard, Ian
Morales-Asencio, Jose Miguel
author_facet Rodriguez-Calero, Miguel Angel
Fernandez-Fernandez, Ismael
Molero-Ballester, Luis Javier
Matamalas-Massanet, Catalina
Moreno-Mejias, Luis
de Pedro-Gomez, Joan Ernest
Blanco-Mavillard, Ian
Morales-Asencio, Jose Miguel
author_sort Rodriguez-Calero, Miguel Angel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients with difficult venous access experience undesirable effects during healthcare, such as delayed diagnosis and initiation of treatment, stress and pain related to the technique and reduced satisfaction. This study aims to identify risk factors with which to model the appearance of difficulty in achieving peripheral venous puncture in hospital treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Case–control study. We will include adult patients requiring peripheral venous cannulation in eight public hospitals, excluding those in emergency situations and women in childbirth or during puerperium. The nurse who performs the technique will record in an anonymised register variables related to the intervention. Subsequently, a researcher will extract the health variables from the patient’s medical history. Patients who present one of the following conditions will be assigned to the case group: two or more failed punctures, need for puncture support, need for central access after failure to achieve peripheral access, or decision to reject the technique. The control group will be obtained from records of patients who do not meet the above conditions. It has been stated a minimum sample size of 2070 patients, 207 cases and 1863 controls. A descriptive analysis will be made of the distribution of the phenomenon. The variables hypothesised to be risk factors for the appearance of difficult venous cannulation will be studied using a logistic regression model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was funded in January 2017 and obtained ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the Balearic Islands. Informed consent will be obtained prior to data collection. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5829883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58298832018-03-01 Risk factors for difficult peripheral venous cannulation in hospitalised patients. Protocol for a multicentre case–control study in 48 units of eight public hospitals in Spain Rodriguez-Calero, Miguel Angel Fernandez-Fernandez, Ismael Molero-Ballester, Luis Javier Matamalas-Massanet, Catalina Moreno-Mejias, Luis de Pedro-Gomez, Joan Ernest Blanco-Mavillard, Ian Morales-Asencio, Jose Miguel BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: Patients with difficult venous access experience undesirable effects during healthcare, such as delayed diagnosis and initiation of treatment, stress and pain related to the technique and reduced satisfaction. This study aims to identify risk factors with which to model the appearance of difficulty in achieving peripheral venous puncture in hospital treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Case–control study. We will include adult patients requiring peripheral venous cannulation in eight public hospitals, excluding those in emergency situations and women in childbirth or during puerperium. The nurse who performs the technique will record in an anonymised register variables related to the intervention. Subsequently, a researcher will extract the health variables from the patient’s medical history. Patients who present one of the following conditions will be assigned to the case group: two or more failed punctures, need for puncture support, need for central access after failure to achieve peripheral access, or decision to reject the technique. The control group will be obtained from records of patients who do not meet the above conditions. It has been stated a minimum sample size of 2070 patients, 207 cases and 1863 controls. A descriptive analysis will be made of the distribution of the phenomenon. The variables hypothesised to be risk factors for the appearance of difficult venous cannulation will be studied using a logistic regression model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was funded in January 2017 and obtained ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the Balearic Islands. Informed consent will be obtained prior to data collection. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5829883/ /pubmed/29439080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020420 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Rodriguez-Calero, Miguel Angel
Fernandez-Fernandez, Ismael
Molero-Ballester, Luis Javier
Matamalas-Massanet, Catalina
Moreno-Mejias, Luis
de Pedro-Gomez, Joan Ernest
Blanco-Mavillard, Ian
Morales-Asencio, Jose Miguel
Risk factors for difficult peripheral venous cannulation in hospitalised patients. Protocol for a multicentre case–control study in 48 units of eight public hospitals in Spain
title Risk factors for difficult peripheral venous cannulation in hospitalised patients. Protocol for a multicentre case–control study in 48 units of eight public hospitals in Spain
title_full Risk factors for difficult peripheral venous cannulation in hospitalised patients. Protocol for a multicentre case–control study in 48 units of eight public hospitals in Spain
title_fullStr Risk factors for difficult peripheral venous cannulation in hospitalised patients. Protocol for a multicentre case–control study in 48 units of eight public hospitals in Spain
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for difficult peripheral venous cannulation in hospitalised patients. Protocol for a multicentre case–control study in 48 units of eight public hospitals in Spain
title_short Risk factors for difficult peripheral venous cannulation in hospitalised patients. Protocol for a multicentre case–control study in 48 units of eight public hospitals in Spain
title_sort risk factors for difficult peripheral venous cannulation in hospitalised patients. protocol for a multicentre case–control study in 48 units of eight public hospitals in spain
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020420
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezcaleromiguelangel riskfactorsfordifficultperipheralvenouscannulationinhospitalisedpatientsprotocolforamulticentrecasecontrolstudyin48unitsofeightpublichospitalsinspain
AT fernandezfernandezismael riskfactorsfordifficultperipheralvenouscannulationinhospitalisedpatientsprotocolforamulticentrecasecontrolstudyin48unitsofeightpublichospitalsinspain
AT moleroballesterluisjavier riskfactorsfordifficultperipheralvenouscannulationinhospitalisedpatientsprotocolforamulticentrecasecontrolstudyin48unitsofeightpublichospitalsinspain
AT matamalasmassanetcatalina riskfactorsfordifficultperipheralvenouscannulationinhospitalisedpatientsprotocolforamulticentrecasecontrolstudyin48unitsofeightpublichospitalsinspain
AT morenomejiasluis riskfactorsfordifficultperipheralvenouscannulationinhospitalisedpatientsprotocolforamulticentrecasecontrolstudyin48unitsofeightpublichospitalsinspain
AT depedrogomezjoanernest riskfactorsfordifficultperipheralvenouscannulationinhospitalisedpatientsprotocolforamulticentrecasecontrolstudyin48unitsofeightpublichospitalsinspain
AT blancomavillardian riskfactorsfordifficultperipheralvenouscannulationinhospitalisedpatientsprotocolforamulticentrecasecontrolstudyin48unitsofeightpublichospitalsinspain
AT moralesasenciojosemiguel riskfactorsfordifficultperipheralvenouscannulationinhospitalisedpatientsprotocolforamulticentrecasecontrolstudyin48unitsofeightpublichospitalsinspain