Cargando…

Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments

INTRODUCTION: In Australia, societal and individual preferences for funding fertility treatment remain largely unknown. This has resulted in a lack of evidence about willingness to pay (WTP) for fertility treatment by either the general population (the funders) or infertile individuals (who directly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Botha, Willings, Donnolley, Natasha, Shanahan, Marian, Chambers, Georgina M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29444788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020509
_version_ 1783302906232963072
author Botha, Willings
Donnolley, Natasha
Shanahan, Marian
Chambers, Georgina M
author_facet Botha, Willings
Donnolley, Natasha
Shanahan, Marian
Chambers, Georgina M
author_sort Botha, Willings
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In Australia, societal and individual preferences for funding fertility treatment remain largely unknown. This has resulted in a lack of evidence about willingness to pay (WTP) for fertility treatment by either the general population (the funders) or infertile individuals (who directly benefit). Using a stated preference discrete choice experiment (SPDCE) approach has been suggested as a more appropriate method to inform economic evaluations of fertility treatment. We outline the protocol for an ongoing study which aims to assess fertility treatment preferences of both the general population and infertile individuals, and indirectly estimate their WTP for fertility treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Two separate but related SPDCEs will be conducted for two population samples—the general population and infertile individuals—to elicit preferences for fertility treatment to indirectly estimate WTP. We describe the qualitative work to be undertaken to design the SPDCEs. We will use D-efficient fractional experimental designs informed by prior coefficients from the pilot surveys. The mode of administration for the SPDCE is also discussed. The final results will be analysed using mixed logit or latent class model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is being funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project grant AP1104543 and has been approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HEC 17255) and a fertility clinic’s ethics committee. Findings of the study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at various conferences. A lay summary of the results will be made publicly available on the University of New South Wales National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit website. Our results will contribute to the development of an evidence-based policy framework for the provision of cost-effective and patient-centred fertility treatment in Australia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5829889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58298892018-03-01 Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments Botha, Willings Donnolley, Natasha Shanahan, Marian Chambers, Georgina M BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: In Australia, societal and individual preferences for funding fertility treatment remain largely unknown. This has resulted in a lack of evidence about willingness to pay (WTP) for fertility treatment by either the general population (the funders) or infertile individuals (who directly benefit). Using a stated preference discrete choice experiment (SPDCE) approach has been suggested as a more appropriate method to inform economic evaluations of fertility treatment. We outline the protocol for an ongoing study which aims to assess fertility treatment preferences of both the general population and infertile individuals, and indirectly estimate their WTP for fertility treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Two separate but related SPDCEs will be conducted for two population samples—the general population and infertile individuals—to elicit preferences for fertility treatment to indirectly estimate WTP. We describe the qualitative work to be undertaken to design the SPDCEs. We will use D-efficient fractional experimental designs informed by prior coefficients from the pilot surveys. The mode of administration for the SPDCE is also discussed. The final results will be analysed using mixed logit or latent class model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is being funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project grant AP1104543 and has been approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HEC 17255) and a fertility clinic’s ethics committee. Findings of the study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at various conferences. A lay summary of the results will be made publicly available on the University of New South Wales National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit website. Our results will contribute to the development of an evidence-based policy framework for the provision of cost-effective and patient-centred fertility treatment in Australia. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5829889/ /pubmed/29444788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020509 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Economics
Botha, Willings
Donnolley, Natasha
Shanahan, Marian
Chambers, Georgina M
Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments
title Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments
title_full Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments
title_fullStr Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments
title_short Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments
title_sort assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29444788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020509
work_keys_str_mv AT bothawillings assessmentofthesocietalandindividualpreferencesforfertilitytreatmentinaustraliastudyprotocolforstatedpreferencediscretechoiceexperiments
AT donnolleynatasha assessmentofthesocietalandindividualpreferencesforfertilitytreatmentinaustraliastudyprotocolforstatedpreferencediscretechoiceexperiments
AT shanahanmarian assessmentofthesocietalandindividualpreferencesforfertilitytreatmentinaustraliastudyprotocolforstatedpreferencediscretechoiceexperiments
AT chambersgeorginam assessmentofthesocietalandindividualpreferencesforfertilitytreatmentinaustraliastudyprotocolforstatedpreferencediscretechoiceexperiments