Cargando…
Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments
INTRODUCTION: In Australia, societal and individual preferences for funding fertility treatment remain largely unknown. This has resulted in a lack of evidence about willingness to pay (WTP) for fertility treatment by either the general population (the funders) or infertile individuals (who directly...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29444788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020509 |
_version_ | 1783302906232963072 |
---|---|
author | Botha, Willings Donnolley, Natasha Shanahan, Marian Chambers, Georgina M |
author_facet | Botha, Willings Donnolley, Natasha Shanahan, Marian Chambers, Georgina M |
author_sort | Botha, Willings |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In Australia, societal and individual preferences for funding fertility treatment remain largely unknown. This has resulted in a lack of evidence about willingness to pay (WTP) for fertility treatment by either the general population (the funders) or infertile individuals (who directly benefit). Using a stated preference discrete choice experiment (SPDCE) approach has been suggested as a more appropriate method to inform economic evaluations of fertility treatment. We outline the protocol for an ongoing study which aims to assess fertility treatment preferences of both the general population and infertile individuals, and indirectly estimate their WTP for fertility treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Two separate but related SPDCEs will be conducted for two population samples—the general population and infertile individuals—to elicit preferences for fertility treatment to indirectly estimate WTP. We describe the qualitative work to be undertaken to design the SPDCEs. We will use D-efficient fractional experimental designs informed by prior coefficients from the pilot surveys. The mode of administration for the SPDCE is also discussed. The final results will be analysed using mixed logit or latent class model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is being funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project grant AP1104543 and has been approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HEC 17255) and a fertility clinic’s ethics committee. Findings of the study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at various conferences. A lay summary of the results will be made publicly available on the University of New South Wales National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit website. Our results will contribute to the development of an evidence-based policy framework for the provision of cost-effective and patient-centred fertility treatment in Australia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5829889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58298892018-03-01 Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments Botha, Willings Donnolley, Natasha Shanahan, Marian Chambers, Georgina M BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: In Australia, societal and individual preferences for funding fertility treatment remain largely unknown. This has resulted in a lack of evidence about willingness to pay (WTP) for fertility treatment by either the general population (the funders) or infertile individuals (who directly benefit). Using a stated preference discrete choice experiment (SPDCE) approach has been suggested as a more appropriate method to inform economic evaluations of fertility treatment. We outline the protocol for an ongoing study which aims to assess fertility treatment preferences of both the general population and infertile individuals, and indirectly estimate their WTP for fertility treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Two separate but related SPDCEs will be conducted for two population samples—the general population and infertile individuals—to elicit preferences for fertility treatment to indirectly estimate WTP. We describe the qualitative work to be undertaken to design the SPDCEs. We will use D-efficient fractional experimental designs informed by prior coefficients from the pilot surveys. The mode of administration for the SPDCE is also discussed. The final results will be analysed using mixed logit or latent class model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is being funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project grant AP1104543 and has been approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HEC 17255) and a fertility clinic’s ethics committee. Findings of the study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at various conferences. A lay summary of the results will be made publicly available on the University of New South Wales National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit website. Our results will contribute to the development of an evidence-based policy framework for the provision of cost-effective and patient-centred fertility treatment in Australia. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5829889/ /pubmed/29444788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020509 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Botha, Willings Donnolley, Natasha Shanahan, Marian Chambers, Georgina M Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments |
title | Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments |
title_full | Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments |
title_short | Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments |
title_sort | assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29444788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bothawillings assessmentofthesocietalandindividualpreferencesforfertilitytreatmentinaustraliastudyprotocolforstatedpreferencediscretechoiceexperiments AT donnolleynatasha assessmentofthesocietalandindividualpreferencesforfertilitytreatmentinaustraliastudyprotocolforstatedpreferencediscretechoiceexperiments AT shanahanmarian assessmentofthesocietalandindividualpreferencesforfertilitytreatmentinaustraliastudyprotocolforstatedpreferencediscretechoiceexperiments AT chambersgeorginam assessmentofthesocietalandindividualpreferencesforfertilitytreatmentinaustraliastudyprotocolforstatedpreferencediscretechoiceexperiments |