Cargando…

New mechanism to identify cost savings in English NHS prescribing: minimising ‘price per unit’, a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Minimising prescription costs while maintaining quality is a core element of delivering high-value healthcare. There are various strategies to achieve savings, but almost no research to date on determining the most effective approach. We describe a new method of identifying potential sav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Croker, Richard, Walker, Alex J, Bacon, Seb, Curtis, Helen J, French, Lisa, Goldacre, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019643
_version_ 1783302906478329856
author Croker, Richard
Walker, Alex J
Bacon, Seb
Curtis, Helen J
French, Lisa
Goldacre, Ben
author_facet Croker, Richard
Walker, Alex J
Bacon, Seb
Curtis, Helen J
French, Lisa
Goldacre, Ben
author_sort Croker, Richard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimising prescription costs while maintaining quality is a core element of delivering high-value healthcare. There are various strategies to achieve savings, but almost no research to date on determining the most effective approach. We describe a new method of identifying potential savings due to large national variations in drug cost, including variation in generic drug cost, and compare these with potential savings from an established method (generic prescribing). METHODS: We used English National Health Service (NHS) Digital prescribing data, from October 2015 to September 2016. Potential cost savings were calculated by determining the price per unit (eg, pill, millilitre) for each drug and dose within each general practice. This was compared against the same cost for the practice at the lowest cost decile to determine achievable savings. We compared these price-per-unit savings to the savings possible from generic switching and determined the chemicals with the highest savings nationally. A senior pharmacist manually assessed whether a random sample of savings were practically achievable. RESULTS: We identified a theoretical maximum of £410 million of savings over 12 months. £273 million of these savings were for individual prescribing changes worth over £50 per practice per month (mean annual saving £33 433 per practice); this compares favourably with generic switching, where only £35 million of achievable savings were identified. The biggest savings nationally were on glucose blood testing reagents (£12 million), fluticasone propionate (£9 million) and venlafaxine (£8 million). Approximately half of all savings were deemed practically achievable. DISCUSSION: We have developed a new method to identify and enable large potential cost savings within NHS community prescribing. Given the current pressures on the NHS, it is vital that these potential savings are realised. Our tool enabling doctors to achieve these savings is now launched in pilot form at OpenPrescribing.net. However, savings could potentially be achieved more simply through national policy change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5829890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58298902018-03-01 New mechanism to identify cost savings in English NHS prescribing: minimising ‘price per unit’, a cross-sectional study Croker, Richard Walker, Alex J Bacon, Seb Curtis, Helen J French, Lisa Goldacre, Ben BMJ Open General practice / Family practice BACKGROUND: Minimising prescription costs while maintaining quality is a core element of delivering high-value healthcare. There are various strategies to achieve savings, but almost no research to date on determining the most effective approach. We describe a new method of identifying potential savings due to large national variations in drug cost, including variation in generic drug cost, and compare these with potential savings from an established method (generic prescribing). METHODS: We used English National Health Service (NHS) Digital prescribing data, from October 2015 to September 2016. Potential cost savings were calculated by determining the price per unit (eg, pill, millilitre) for each drug and dose within each general practice. This was compared against the same cost for the practice at the lowest cost decile to determine achievable savings. We compared these price-per-unit savings to the savings possible from generic switching and determined the chemicals with the highest savings nationally. A senior pharmacist manually assessed whether a random sample of savings were practically achievable. RESULTS: We identified a theoretical maximum of £410 million of savings over 12 months. £273 million of these savings were for individual prescribing changes worth over £50 per practice per month (mean annual saving £33 433 per practice); this compares favourably with generic switching, where only £35 million of achievable savings were identified. The biggest savings nationally were on glucose blood testing reagents (£12 million), fluticasone propionate (£9 million) and venlafaxine (£8 million). Approximately half of all savings were deemed practically achievable. DISCUSSION: We have developed a new method to identify and enable large potential cost savings within NHS community prescribing. Given the current pressures on the NHS, it is vital that these potential savings are realised. Our tool enabling doctors to achieve these savings is now launched in pilot form at OpenPrescribing.net. However, savings could potentially be achieved more simply through national policy change. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5829890/ /pubmed/29439078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019643 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Croker, Richard
Walker, Alex J
Bacon, Seb
Curtis, Helen J
French, Lisa
Goldacre, Ben
New mechanism to identify cost savings in English NHS prescribing: minimising ‘price per unit’, a cross-sectional study
title New mechanism to identify cost savings in English NHS prescribing: minimising ‘price per unit’, a cross-sectional study
title_full New mechanism to identify cost savings in English NHS prescribing: minimising ‘price per unit’, a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr New mechanism to identify cost savings in English NHS prescribing: minimising ‘price per unit’, a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed New mechanism to identify cost savings in English NHS prescribing: minimising ‘price per unit’, a cross-sectional study
title_short New mechanism to identify cost savings in English NHS prescribing: minimising ‘price per unit’, a cross-sectional study
title_sort new mechanism to identify cost savings in english nhs prescribing: minimising ‘price per unit’, a cross-sectional study
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019643
work_keys_str_mv AT crokerrichard newmechanismtoidentifycostsavingsinenglishnhsprescribingminimisingpriceperunitacrosssectionalstudy
AT walkeralexj newmechanismtoidentifycostsavingsinenglishnhsprescribingminimisingpriceperunitacrosssectionalstudy
AT baconseb newmechanismtoidentifycostsavingsinenglishnhsprescribingminimisingpriceperunitacrosssectionalstudy
AT curtishelenj newmechanismtoidentifycostsavingsinenglishnhsprescribingminimisingpriceperunitacrosssectionalstudy
AT frenchlisa newmechanismtoidentifycostsavingsinenglishnhsprescribingminimisingpriceperunitacrosssectionalstudy
AT goldacreben newmechanismtoidentifycostsavingsinenglishnhsprescribingminimisingpriceperunitacrosssectionalstudy