Cargando…

Standard echocardiography versus handheld echocardiography for the detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a preventable and treatable chronic condition which persists in many developing countries largely affecting impoverished populations. Handheld echocardiography presents an opportunity to address the need for more cost-effective methods of diagnosing RHD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Telford, Lisa H, Abdullahi, Leila H, Ochodo, Eleanor A, Zühlke, Liesl J, Engel, Mark E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020140
_version_ 1783302919992377344
author Telford, Lisa H
Abdullahi, Leila H
Ochodo, Eleanor A
Zühlke, Liesl J
Engel, Mark E
author_facet Telford, Lisa H
Abdullahi, Leila H
Ochodo, Eleanor A
Zühlke, Liesl J
Engel, Mark E
author_sort Telford, Lisa H
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a preventable and treatable chronic condition which persists in many developing countries largely affecting impoverished populations. Handheld echocardiography presents an opportunity to address the need for more cost-effective methods of diagnosing RHD in developing countries, where the disease continues to carry high rates of morbidity and mortality. Preliminary studies have demonstrated moderate sensitivity as well as high specificity and diagnostic odds for detecting RHD in asymptomatic patients. We describe a protocol for a systematic review on the diagnostic performance of handheld echocardiography compared to standard echocardiography using the 2012 World Heart Federation criteria for diagnosing subclinical RHD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and EBSCOhost as well as reference lists and citations of relevant articles will be searched from 2012 to date using a predefined strategy incorporating a combination of Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords. The methodological validity and quality of studies deemed eligible for inclusion will be assessed against review specific Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 criteria and information on metrics of diagnostic accuracy and demographics extracted. Forest plots of sensitivity and specificity as well as scatter plots in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) space will be used to investigate heterogeneity. If possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted to produce summary results of sensitivity and specificity using the Hierarchical Summary ROC method. In addition, a sensitivity analysis will be conducted to investigate the effect of studies with a high risk of bias. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review of previously published literature. The planned review will provide a summary of the diagnostic accuracy of handheld echocardiography. Results may feed into evidence-based guidelines and should the findings of this review warrant a change in clinical practice, a summary report will be disseminated among leading clinicians and healthcare professionals in the field. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016051261.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5829946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58299462018-03-01 Standard echocardiography versus handheld echocardiography for the detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease: protocol for a systematic review Telford, Lisa H Abdullahi, Leila H Ochodo, Eleanor A Zühlke, Liesl J Engel, Mark E BMJ Open Diagnostics INTRODUCTION: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a preventable and treatable chronic condition which persists in many developing countries largely affecting impoverished populations. Handheld echocardiography presents an opportunity to address the need for more cost-effective methods of diagnosing RHD in developing countries, where the disease continues to carry high rates of morbidity and mortality. Preliminary studies have demonstrated moderate sensitivity as well as high specificity and diagnostic odds for detecting RHD in asymptomatic patients. We describe a protocol for a systematic review on the diagnostic performance of handheld echocardiography compared to standard echocardiography using the 2012 World Heart Federation criteria for diagnosing subclinical RHD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and EBSCOhost as well as reference lists and citations of relevant articles will be searched from 2012 to date using a predefined strategy incorporating a combination of Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords. The methodological validity and quality of studies deemed eligible for inclusion will be assessed against review specific Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 criteria and information on metrics of diagnostic accuracy and demographics extracted. Forest plots of sensitivity and specificity as well as scatter plots in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) space will be used to investigate heterogeneity. If possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted to produce summary results of sensitivity and specificity using the Hierarchical Summary ROC method. In addition, a sensitivity analysis will be conducted to investigate the effect of studies with a high risk of bias. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review of previously published literature. The planned review will provide a summary of the diagnostic accuracy of handheld echocardiography. Results may feed into evidence-based guidelines and should the findings of this review warrant a change in clinical practice, a summary report will be disseminated among leading clinicians and healthcare professionals in the field. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016051261. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5829946/ /pubmed/29440164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020140 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Diagnostics
Telford, Lisa H
Abdullahi, Leila H
Ochodo, Eleanor A
Zühlke, Liesl J
Engel, Mark E
Standard echocardiography versus handheld echocardiography for the detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease: protocol for a systematic review
title Standard echocardiography versus handheld echocardiography for the detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease: protocol for a systematic review
title_full Standard echocardiography versus handheld echocardiography for the detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease: protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Standard echocardiography versus handheld echocardiography for the detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease: protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Standard echocardiography versus handheld echocardiography for the detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease: protocol for a systematic review
title_short Standard echocardiography versus handheld echocardiography for the detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease: protocol for a systematic review
title_sort standard echocardiography versus handheld echocardiography for the detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease: protocol for a systematic review
topic Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020140
work_keys_str_mv AT telfordlisah standardechocardiographyversushandheldechocardiographyforthedetectionofsubclinicalrheumaticheartdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview
AT abdullahileilah standardechocardiographyversushandheldechocardiographyforthedetectionofsubclinicalrheumaticheartdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview
AT ochodoeleanora standardechocardiographyversushandheldechocardiographyforthedetectionofsubclinicalrheumaticheartdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview
AT zuhlkelieslj standardechocardiographyversushandheldechocardiographyforthedetectionofsubclinicalrheumaticheartdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview
AT engelmarke standardechocardiographyversushandheldechocardiographyforthedetectionofsubclinicalrheumaticheartdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview