Cargando…

Melphalan 140 mg/m(2) or 200 mg/m(2) for autologous transplantation in myeloma: results from the Collaboration to Collect Autologous Transplant Outcomes in Lymphoma and Myeloma (CALM) study. A report by the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party

Melphalan at a dose of 200 mg/m(2) is standard conditioning prior to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma, but a dose of 140 mg/m(2) is often used in clinical practice in patients perceived to be at risk of excess toxicity. To determine whether melphalan 200 mg/m(2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Auner, Holger W., Iacobelli, Simona, Sbianchi, Giulia, Knol-Bout, Cora, Blaise, Didier, Russell, Nigel H., Apperley, Jane F., Pohlreich, David, Browne, Paul V., Kobbe, Guido, Isaksson, Cecilia, Lenhoff, Stig, Scheid, Christof, Touzeau, Cyrille, Jantunen, Esa, Anagnostopoulos, Achilles, Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim, Tanase, Alina, Schaap, Nicolaas, Wiktor-Jedrzejczak, Wieslaw, Krejci, Marta, Schönland, Stefan O., Morris, Curly, Garderet, Laurent, Kröger, Nicolaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ferrata Storti Foundation 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5830386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29217776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.181339
Descripción
Sumario:Melphalan at a dose of 200 mg/m(2) is standard conditioning prior to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma, but a dose of 140 mg/m(2) is often used in clinical practice in patients perceived to be at risk of excess toxicity. To determine whether melphalan 200 mg/m(2) and melphalan 140 mg/m(2) are equally effective and tolerable in clinically relevant patient subgroups we analyzed 1964 first single autologous transplantation episodes using a series of Cox proportional-hazards models. Overall survival, progression-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, hematopoietic recovery and second primary malignancy rates were not significantly different between the melphalan 140 mg/m(2) (n=245) and melphalan 200 mg/m(2) (n=1719) groups. Multivariable subgroup analysis showed that disease status at transplantation interacted with overall survival, progression-free survival, and cumulative incidence of relapse, with a significant advantage associated with melphalan 200 mg/m(2) in patients transplanted in less than partial response (adjusted hazard ratios for melphalan 200 mg/m(2) versus melphalan 140 mg/m(2): 0.5, 0.54, and 0.56). In contrast, transplantation in very good partial or complete response significantly favored melphalan 140 mg/m(2) for overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.02). Age, renal function, prior proteasome inhibitor treatment, gender, or Karnofsky score did not interact with overall/progression-free survival or relapse rate in the melphalan dose groups. There were no significant survival or relapse rate differences between melphalan 200 mg/m(2) and melphalan 140 mg/m(2) patients with high-risk or standard-risk chromosomal abnormalities. In conclusion, remission status at the time of transplantation may favor the use of melphalan 200 mg/m(2) or melphalan 140 mg/m(2) for key transplant outcomes (NCT01362972).