Cargando…

Estimating apple tree canopy chlorophyll content based on Sentinel-2A remote sensing imaging

The remote sensing technology provides a new means for the determination of chlorophyll content in apple trees that includes a rapid analysis, low cost and large monitoring area. The Back-Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) and the Supported Vector Machine Regression (SVMR) methods were both frequentl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Cheng, Zhu, Xicun, Wei, Yu, Cao, Shujing, Guo, Xiaoyan, Yu, Xinyang, Chang, Chunyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5830534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29491437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21963-0
Descripción
Sumario:The remote sensing technology provides a new means for the determination of chlorophyll content in apple trees that includes a rapid analysis, low cost and large monitoring area. The Back-Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) and the Supported Vector Machine Regression (SVMR) methods were both frequently used method to construct estimation model based on remote sensing imaging. The aim of this study was to find out which estimation model of apple tree canopy chlorophyll content based on the vegetation indices constructed with visible, red edge and near-infrared bands of the sensor of Sentinel-2 was more accurate and stabler. The results were as follows: The calibration set coefficient of determination (R(2)) value of 0.729 and validation set R(2) value of 0.667 of the model using the SVMR method based on the vegetation indices (NDVI(green) + NDVI(red) + NDVI(re)) were higher than those of the model using the BPNN method by 8.2% and 11.0%, respectively. The calibration set root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.159 and validation set RMSE of 0.178 of the model using the SVMR method based on the vegetation indices (NDVI(green) + NDVI(red) + NDVI(re)) were lower than those of the model using the BPNN method by 5.9% and 3.8%, respectively.