Cargando…

Controlled iris radiance in a diurnal fish looking at prey

Active sensing using light, or active photolocation, is only known from deep sea and nocturnal fish with chemiluminescent ‘search’ lights. Bright irides in diurnal fish species have recently been proposed as a potential analogue. Here, we contribute to this discussion by testing whether iris radianc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michiels, Nico K., Seeburger, Victoria C., Kalb, Nadine, Meadows, Melissa G., Anthes, Nils, Mailli, Amalia A., Jack, Colin B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5830713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170838
_version_ 1783303044876730368
author Michiels, Nico K.
Seeburger, Victoria C.
Kalb, Nadine
Meadows, Melissa G.
Anthes, Nils
Mailli, Amalia A.
Jack, Colin B.
author_facet Michiels, Nico K.
Seeburger, Victoria C.
Kalb, Nadine
Meadows, Melissa G.
Anthes, Nils
Mailli, Amalia A.
Jack, Colin B.
author_sort Michiels, Nico K.
collection PubMed
description Active sensing using light, or active photolocation, is only known from deep sea and nocturnal fish with chemiluminescent ‘search’ lights. Bright irides in diurnal fish species have recently been proposed as a potential analogue. Here, we contribute to this discussion by testing whether iris radiance is actively modulated. The focus is on behaviourally controlled iris reflections, called ‘ocular sparks’. The triplefin Tripterygion delaisi can alternate between red and blue ocular sparks, allowing us to test the prediction that spark frequency and hue depend on background hue and prey presence. In a first experiment, we found that blue ocular sparks were significantly more often ‘on’ against red backgrounds, and red ocular sparks against blue backgrounds, particularly when copepods were present. A second experiment tested whether hungry fish showed more ocular sparks, which was not the case. However, background hue once more resulted in a significant differential use of ocular sparks. We conclude that iris radiance through ocular sparks in T. delaisi is not a side effect of eye movement, but adaptively modulated in response to the context under which prey are detected. We discuss the possible alternative functions of ocular sparks, including an as yet speculative role in active photolocation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5830713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58307132018-03-07 Controlled iris radiance in a diurnal fish looking at prey Michiels, Nico K. Seeburger, Victoria C. Kalb, Nadine Meadows, Melissa G. Anthes, Nils Mailli, Amalia A. Jack, Colin B. R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Active sensing using light, or active photolocation, is only known from deep sea and nocturnal fish with chemiluminescent ‘search’ lights. Bright irides in diurnal fish species have recently been proposed as a potential analogue. Here, we contribute to this discussion by testing whether iris radiance is actively modulated. The focus is on behaviourally controlled iris reflections, called ‘ocular sparks’. The triplefin Tripterygion delaisi can alternate between red and blue ocular sparks, allowing us to test the prediction that spark frequency and hue depend on background hue and prey presence. In a first experiment, we found that blue ocular sparks were significantly more often ‘on’ against red backgrounds, and red ocular sparks against blue backgrounds, particularly when copepods were present. A second experiment tested whether hungry fish showed more ocular sparks, which was not the case. However, background hue once more resulted in a significant differential use of ocular sparks. We conclude that iris radiance through ocular sparks in T. delaisi is not a side effect of eye movement, but adaptively modulated in response to the context under which prey are detected. We discuss the possible alternative functions of ocular sparks, including an as yet speculative role in active photolocation. The Royal Society Publishing 2018-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5830713/ /pubmed/29515824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170838 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Michiels, Nico K.
Seeburger, Victoria C.
Kalb, Nadine
Meadows, Melissa G.
Anthes, Nils
Mailli, Amalia A.
Jack, Colin B.
Controlled iris radiance in a diurnal fish looking at prey
title Controlled iris radiance in a diurnal fish looking at prey
title_full Controlled iris radiance in a diurnal fish looking at prey
title_fullStr Controlled iris radiance in a diurnal fish looking at prey
title_full_unstemmed Controlled iris radiance in a diurnal fish looking at prey
title_short Controlled iris radiance in a diurnal fish looking at prey
title_sort controlled iris radiance in a diurnal fish looking at prey
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5830713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170838
work_keys_str_mv AT michielsnicok controlledirisradianceinadiurnalfishlookingatprey
AT seeburgervictoriac controlledirisradianceinadiurnalfishlookingatprey
AT kalbnadine controlledirisradianceinadiurnalfishlookingatprey
AT meadowsmelissag controlledirisradianceinadiurnalfishlookingatprey
AT anthesnils controlledirisradianceinadiurnalfishlookingatprey
AT mailliamaliaa controlledirisradianceinadiurnalfishlookingatprey
AT jackcolinb controlledirisradianceinadiurnalfishlookingatprey