Cargando…
External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials
Social insects live in dense groups with a high probability of disease transmission and have therefore faced strong pressures to develop defences against pathogens. For this reason, social insects have been hypothesized to invest in antimicrobial secretions as a mechanism of external immunity to pre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5830739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171332 |
_version_ | 1783303051137777664 |
---|---|
author | Penick, Clint A. Halawani, Omar Pearson, Bria Mathews, Stephanie López-Uribe, Margarita M. Dunn, Robert R. Smith, Adrian A. |
author_facet | Penick, Clint A. Halawani, Omar Pearson, Bria Mathews, Stephanie López-Uribe, Margarita M. Dunn, Robert R. Smith, Adrian A. |
author_sort | Penick, Clint A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Social insects live in dense groups with a high probability of disease transmission and have therefore faced strong pressures to develop defences against pathogens. For this reason, social insects have been hypothesized to invest in antimicrobial secretions as a mechanism of external immunity to prevent the spread of disease. However, empirical studies linking the evolution of sociality with increased investment in antimicrobials have been relatively few. Here we quantify the strength of antimicrobial secretions among 20 ant species that cover a broad spectrum of ant diversity and colony sizes. We extracted external compounds from ant workers to test whether they inhibited the growth of the bacterium Staphylococcus epidermidis. Because all ant species are highly social, we predicted that all species would exhibit some antimicrobial activity and that species that form the largest colonies would exhibit the strongest antimicrobial response. Our comparative approach revealed that strong surface antimicrobials are common to particular ant clades, but 40% of species exhibited no antimicrobial activity at all. We also found no correlation between antimicrobial activity and colony size. Rather than relying on antimicrobial secretions as external immunity to control pathogen spread, many ant species have probably developed alternative strategies to defend against disease pressure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5830739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Royal Society Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58307392018-03-07 External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials Penick, Clint A. Halawani, Omar Pearson, Bria Mathews, Stephanie López-Uribe, Margarita M. Dunn, Robert R. Smith, Adrian A. R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Social insects live in dense groups with a high probability of disease transmission and have therefore faced strong pressures to develop defences against pathogens. For this reason, social insects have been hypothesized to invest in antimicrobial secretions as a mechanism of external immunity to prevent the spread of disease. However, empirical studies linking the evolution of sociality with increased investment in antimicrobials have been relatively few. Here we quantify the strength of antimicrobial secretions among 20 ant species that cover a broad spectrum of ant diversity and colony sizes. We extracted external compounds from ant workers to test whether they inhibited the growth of the bacterium Staphylococcus epidermidis. Because all ant species are highly social, we predicted that all species would exhibit some antimicrobial activity and that species that form the largest colonies would exhibit the strongest antimicrobial response. Our comparative approach revealed that strong surface antimicrobials are common to particular ant clades, but 40% of species exhibited no antimicrobial activity at all. We also found no correlation between antimicrobial activity and colony size. Rather than relying on antimicrobial secretions as external immunity to control pathogen spread, many ant species have probably developed alternative strategies to defend against disease pressure. The Royal Society Publishing 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5830739/ /pubmed/29515850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171332 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Biology (Whole Organism) Penick, Clint A. Halawani, Omar Pearson, Bria Mathews, Stephanie López-Uribe, Margarita M. Dunn, Robert R. Smith, Adrian A. External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials |
title | External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials |
title_full | External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials |
title_fullStr | External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials |
title_full_unstemmed | External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials |
title_short | External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials |
title_sort | external immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials |
topic | Biology (Whole Organism) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5830739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171332 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penickclinta externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials AT halawaniomar externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials AT pearsonbria externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials AT mathewsstephanie externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials AT lopezuribemargaritam externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials AT dunnrobertr externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials AT smithadriana externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials |