Cargando…

External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials

Social insects live in dense groups with a high probability of disease transmission and have therefore faced strong pressures to develop defences against pathogens. For this reason, social insects have been hypothesized to invest in antimicrobial secretions as a mechanism of external immunity to pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penick, Clint A., Halawani, Omar, Pearson, Bria, Mathews, Stephanie, López-Uribe, Margarita M., Dunn, Robert R., Smith, Adrian A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5830739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171332
_version_ 1783303051137777664
author Penick, Clint A.
Halawani, Omar
Pearson, Bria
Mathews, Stephanie
López-Uribe, Margarita M.
Dunn, Robert R.
Smith, Adrian A.
author_facet Penick, Clint A.
Halawani, Omar
Pearson, Bria
Mathews, Stephanie
López-Uribe, Margarita M.
Dunn, Robert R.
Smith, Adrian A.
author_sort Penick, Clint A.
collection PubMed
description Social insects live in dense groups with a high probability of disease transmission and have therefore faced strong pressures to develop defences against pathogens. For this reason, social insects have been hypothesized to invest in antimicrobial secretions as a mechanism of external immunity to prevent the spread of disease. However, empirical studies linking the evolution of sociality with increased investment in antimicrobials have been relatively few. Here we quantify the strength of antimicrobial secretions among 20 ant species that cover a broad spectrum of ant diversity and colony sizes. We extracted external compounds from ant workers to test whether they inhibited the growth of the bacterium Staphylococcus epidermidis. Because all ant species are highly social, we predicted that all species would exhibit some antimicrobial activity and that species that form the largest colonies would exhibit the strongest antimicrobial response. Our comparative approach revealed that strong surface antimicrobials are common to particular ant clades, but 40% of species exhibited no antimicrobial activity at all. We also found no correlation between antimicrobial activity and colony size. Rather than relying on antimicrobial secretions as external immunity to control pathogen spread, many ant species have probably developed alternative strategies to defend against disease pressure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5830739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58307392018-03-07 External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials Penick, Clint A. Halawani, Omar Pearson, Bria Mathews, Stephanie López-Uribe, Margarita M. Dunn, Robert R. Smith, Adrian A. R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Social insects live in dense groups with a high probability of disease transmission and have therefore faced strong pressures to develop defences against pathogens. For this reason, social insects have been hypothesized to invest in antimicrobial secretions as a mechanism of external immunity to prevent the spread of disease. However, empirical studies linking the evolution of sociality with increased investment in antimicrobials have been relatively few. Here we quantify the strength of antimicrobial secretions among 20 ant species that cover a broad spectrum of ant diversity and colony sizes. We extracted external compounds from ant workers to test whether they inhibited the growth of the bacterium Staphylococcus epidermidis. Because all ant species are highly social, we predicted that all species would exhibit some antimicrobial activity and that species that form the largest colonies would exhibit the strongest antimicrobial response. Our comparative approach revealed that strong surface antimicrobials are common to particular ant clades, but 40% of species exhibited no antimicrobial activity at all. We also found no correlation between antimicrobial activity and colony size. Rather than relying on antimicrobial secretions as external immunity to control pathogen spread, many ant species have probably developed alternative strategies to defend against disease pressure. The Royal Society Publishing 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5830739/ /pubmed/29515850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171332 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Penick, Clint A.
Halawani, Omar
Pearson, Bria
Mathews, Stephanie
López-Uribe, Margarita M.
Dunn, Robert R.
Smith, Adrian A.
External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials
title External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials
title_full External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials
title_fullStr External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials
title_full_unstemmed External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials
title_short External immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials
title_sort external immunity in ant societies: sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5830739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171332
work_keys_str_mv AT penickclinta externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials
AT halawaniomar externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials
AT pearsonbria externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials
AT mathewsstephanie externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials
AT lopezuribemargaritam externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials
AT dunnrobertr externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials
AT smithadriana externalimmunityinantsocietiessocialityandcolonysizedonotpredictinvestmentinantimicrobials