Cargando…

Natural variation in female reproductive hormones does not affect contrast sensitivity

Evidence suggests that females experience adaptive shifts in facial preferences across the menstrual cycle. However, recent discussions and meta-analyses suggest that these findings are equivocal. A previously unexplored question is the extent to which shifts in female preferences are modulated by h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webb, Abigail L. M., Hibbard, Paul B., O'Gorman, Rick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5830758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171566
_version_ 1783303055664480256
author Webb, Abigail L. M.
Hibbard, Paul B.
O'Gorman, Rick
author_facet Webb, Abigail L. M.
Hibbard, Paul B.
O'Gorman, Rick
author_sort Webb, Abigail L. M.
collection PubMed
description Evidence suggests that females experience adaptive shifts in facial preferences across the menstrual cycle. However, recent discussions and meta-analyses suggest that these findings are equivocal. A previously unexplored question is the extent to which shifts in female preferences are modulated by hormone-dependent changes occurring in low-level vision, such as visual sensitivity. This mechanistic approach has been a novel method for investigating the extent to which complex perceptual phenomena are driven by low-level versus higher-level perceptual processes. We investigated whether the contrast sensitivity function—an early dimension of vision—is also influenced by variation in female reproductive hormones. Visual contrast thresholds were measured for 1, 4 and 16 cycles/degree gratings during the ovulatory, luteal and menstrual phases of the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling women, and women using oral contraceptives. Male participants were tested at similar time intervals. Results showed that visual contrast sensitivity does not differ according to sex, or use of oral contraception, nor does it vary relative to hormonal shifts across the menstrual cycle. These findings suggest that shifts in female preferences are not driven by changes in visual sensitivity, and are therefore likely attributable to changes in higher-level perception or cognition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5830758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58307582018-03-07 Natural variation in female reproductive hormones does not affect contrast sensitivity Webb, Abigail L. M. Hibbard, Paul B. O'Gorman, Rick R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Evidence suggests that females experience adaptive shifts in facial preferences across the menstrual cycle. However, recent discussions and meta-analyses suggest that these findings are equivocal. A previously unexplored question is the extent to which shifts in female preferences are modulated by hormone-dependent changes occurring in low-level vision, such as visual sensitivity. This mechanistic approach has been a novel method for investigating the extent to which complex perceptual phenomena are driven by low-level versus higher-level perceptual processes. We investigated whether the contrast sensitivity function—an early dimension of vision—is also influenced by variation in female reproductive hormones. Visual contrast thresholds were measured for 1, 4 and 16 cycles/degree gratings during the ovulatory, luteal and menstrual phases of the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling women, and women using oral contraceptives. Male participants were tested at similar time intervals. Results showed that visual contrast sensitivity does not differ according to sex, or use of oral contraception, nor does it vary relative to hormonal shifts across the menstrual cycle. These findings suggest that shifts in female preferences are not driven by changes in visual sensitivity, and are therefore likely attributable to changes in higher-level perception or cognition. The Royal Society Publishing 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5830758/ /pubmed/29515869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171566 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
Webb, Abigail L. M.
Hibbard, Paul B.
O'Gorman, Rick
Natural variation in female reproductive hormones does not affect contrast sensitivity
title Natural variation in female reproductive hormones does not affect contrast sensitivity
title_full Natural variation in female reproductive hormones does not affect contrast sensitivity
title_fullStr Natural variation in female reproductive hormones does not affect contrast sensitivity
title_full_unstemmed Natural variation in female reproductive hormones does not affect contrast sensitivity
title_short Natural variation in female reproductive hormones does not affect contrast sensitivity
title_sort natural variation in female reproductive hormones does not affect contrast sensitivity
topic Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5830758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171566
work_keys_str_mv AT webbabigaillm naturalvariationinfemalereproductivehormonesdoesnotaffectcontrastsensitivity
AT hibbardpaulb naturalvariationinfemalereproductivehormonesdoesnotaffectcontrastsensitivity
AT ogormanrick naturalvariationinfemalereproductivehormonesdoesnotaffectcontrastsensitivity