Cargando…

Validation of the C.A.R.E. stimulus set of 640 animal pictures: Name agreement and quality ratings

Stimulus sets are valuable tools that can facilitate the work of researchers designing experiments. Images of faces, and line drawings of objects have been developed and validated, however, pictures of animals, that do not contain backgrounds, have not been made available. Here we present image agre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russo, Natalie, Hagmann, Carl Erick, Andrews, Rosemary, Black, Conner, Silberman, Magenta, Shea, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192906
_version_ 1783303114240032768
author Russo, Natalie
Hagmann, Carl Erick
Andrews, Rosemary
Black, Conner
Silberman, Magenta
Shea, Nicole
author_facet Russo, Natalie
Hagmann, Carl Erick
Andrews, Rosemary
Black, Conner
Silberman, Magenta
Shea, Nicole
author_sort Russo, Natalie
collection PubMed
description Stimulus sets are valuable tools that can facilitate the work of researchers designing experiments. Images of faces, and line drawings of objects have been developed and validated, however, pictures of animals, that do not contain backgrounds, have not been made available. Here we present image agreement and quality ratings for a set of 640 color images of animals on a transparent background, across 60 different basic categories (e.g. cat, dog, frog, bird), some with few, and others with many exemplars. These images were normed on 302 participants. Image agreement was measured both with respect to the proportion of participants that provided the same name as well as the H-statistic for each image. Image quality was measured both overall, and with respect to the accuracy of participants’ naming of the basic category. Word frequency of each basic and superordinate category based on the English Lexicon Project (Balota, et al., 2007) and the HAL database (Kucera & Francis, 1976) are provided as are Age of Acquisition (Kuperman, Stadthagen-Gonzalez, & Brysbaert, 2012) data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5831035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58310352018-03-19 Validation of the C.A.R.E. stimulus set of 640 animal pictures: Name agreement and quality ratings Russo, Natalie Hagmann, Carl Erick Andrews, Rosemary Black, Conner Silberman, Magenta Shea, Nicole PLoS One Research Article Stimulus sets are valuable tools that can facilitate the work of researchers designing experiments. Images of faces, and line drawings of objects have been developed and validated, however, pictures of animals, that do not contain backgrounds, have not been made available. Here we present image agreement and quality ratings for a set of 640 color images of animals on a transparent background, across 60 different basic categories (e.g. cat, dog, frog, bird), some with few, and others with many exemplars. These images were normed on 302 participants. Image agreement was measured both with respect to the proportion of participants that provided the same name as well as the H-statistic for each image. Image quality was measured both overall, and with respect to the accuracy of participants’ naming of the basic category. Word frequency of each basic and superordinate category based on the English Lexicon Project (Balota, et al., 2007) and the HAL database (Kucera & Francis, 1976) are provided as are Age of Acquisition (Kuperman, Stadthagen-Gonzalez, & Brysbaert, 2012) data. Public Library of Science 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5831035/ /pubmed/29489882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192906 Text en © 2018 Russo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Russo, Natalie
Hagmann, Carl Erick
Andrews, Rosemary
Black, Conner
Silberman, Magenta
Shea, Nicole
Validation of the C.A.R.E. stimulus set of 640 animal pictures: Name agreement and quality ratings
title Validation of the C.A.R.E. stimulus set of 640 animal pictures: Name agreement and quality ratings
title_full Validation of the C.A.R.E. stimulus set of 640 animal pictures: Name agreement and quality ratings
title_fullStr Validation of the C.A.R.E. stimulus set of 640 animal pictures: Name agreement and quality ratings
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the C.A.R.E. stimulus set of 640 animal pictures: Name agreement and quality ratings
title_short Validation of the C.A.R.E. stimulus set of 640 animal pictures: Name agreement and quality ratings
title_sort validation of the c.a.r.e. stimulus set of 640 animal pictures: name agreement and quality ratings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192906
work_keys_str_mv AT russonatalie validationofthecarestimulussetof640animalpicturesnameagreementandqualityratings
AT hagmanncarlerick validationofthecarestimulussetof640animalpicturesnameagreementandqualityratings
AT andrewsrosemary validationofthecarestimulussetof640animalpicturesnameagreementandqualityratings
AT blackconner validationofthecarestimulussetof640animalpicturesnameagreementandqualityratings
AT silbermanmagenta validationofthecarestimulussetof640animalpicturesnameagreementandqualityratings
AT sheanicole validationofthecarestimulussetof640animalpicturesnameagreementandqualityratings