Cargando…

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: report of two cases and literature review

BACKGROUND: Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PHNEC) is extremely rare. The diagnosis of PHNEC remains challenging—partly due to its rarity, and partly due to its lack of unique clinical features. Available treatment options for PHNEC include surgical resection of the liver tumor(s), radioth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Zi-Ming, Wang, Jin, Ugwuowo, Ugochukwu C., Wang, Liming, Townsend, Jeffrey P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29507528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12907-018-0070-7
_version_ 1783303190388670464
author Zhao, Zi-Ming
Wang, Jin
Ugwuowo, Ugochukwu C.
Wang, Liming
Townsend, Jeffrey P.
author_facet Zhao, Zi-Ming
Wang, Jin
Ugwuowo, Ugochukwu C.
Wang, Liming
Townsend, Jeffrey P.
author_sort Zhao, Zi-Ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PHNEC) is extremely rare. The diagnosis of PHNEC remains challenging—partly due to its rarity, and partly due to its lack of unique clinical features. Available treatment options for PHNEC include surgical resection of the liver tumor(s), radiotherapy, liver transplant, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and administration of somatostatin analogues. CASE PRESENTATION: We report two male PHNEC cases and discuss the diagnosis and treatment options. Both cases presented with abdominal pain; case two also presented with symptoms of jaundice. The initial diagnosis for both cases was poorly differentiated grade 3 small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, based on imaging characteristics and the pathology of liver biopsies. Final diagnoses of PHNEC were arrived at by ruling out non-hepatic origins. Case one presented with a large tumor in the right liver lobe, and the patient was treated with TACE. Case two presented with tumors in both liver lobes, invasions into the left branch of hepatic portal vein, and metastasis in the hepatic hilar lymph node. This patient was ineligible for TACE and was allergic to the somatostatin analogue octreotide. This limited treatment options to supportive therapies such as albumin supplementation for liver protection. Patient one and two died at 61 and 109 days, respectively, following initial hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: We diagnosed both cases with poorly differentiated grade 3 small-cell PHNEC through imaging characteristics, immunohistochemical staining of liver biopsies, and examinations to eliminate non-hepatic origins. Neither TACE nor liver protection appeared to significantly extend survival time of the two patients, suggesting these treatments may be inadequate to improve survival of patients with poorly differentiated grade 3 small-cell PHNEC. The prognosis of poorly differentiated grade 3 small-cell PHNEC is poor due to limited and ineffective treatment options. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12907-018-0070-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5831736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58317362018-03-05 Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: report of two cases and literature review Zhao, Zi-Ming Wang, Jin Ugwuowo, Ugochukwu C. Wang, Liming Townsend, Jeffrey P. BMC Clin Pathol Case Report BACKGROUND: Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (PHNEC) is extremely rare. The diagnosis of PHNEC remains challenging—partly due to its rarity, and partly due to its lack of unique clinical features. Available treatment options for PHNEC include surgical resection of the liver tumor(s), radiotherapy, liver transplant, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and administration of somatostatin analogues. CASE PRESENTATION: We report two male PHNEC cases and discuss the diagnosis and treatment options. Both cases presented with abdominal pain; case two also presented with symptoms of jaundice. The initial diagnosis for both cases was poorly differentiated grade 3 small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, based on imaging characteristics and the pathology of liver biopsies. Final diagnoses of PHNEC were arrived at by ruling out non-hepatic origins. Case one presented with a large tumor in the right liver lobe, and the patient was treated with TACE. Case two presented with tumors in both liver lobes, invasions into the left branch of hepatic portal vein, and metastasis in the hepatic hilar lymph node. This patient was ineligible for TACE and was allergic to the somatostatin analogue octreotide. This limited treatment options to supportive therapies such as albumin supplementation for liver protection. Patient one and two died at 61 and 109 days, respectively, following initial hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: We diagnosed both cases with poorly differentiated grade 3 small-cell PHNEC through imaging characteristics, immunohistochemical staining of liver biopsies, and examinations to eliminate non-hepatic origins. Neither TACE nor liver protection appeared to significantly extend survival time of the two patients, suggesting these treatments may be inadequate to improve survival of patients with poorly differentiated grade 3 small-cell PHNEC. The prognosis of poorly differentiated grade 3 small-cell PHNEC is poor due to limited and ineffective treatment options. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12907-018-0070-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5831736/ /pubmed/29507528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12907-018-0070-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Zhao, Zi-Ming
Wang, Jin
Ugwuowo, Ugochukwu C.
Wang, Liming
Townsend, Jeffrey P.
Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: report of two cases and literature review
title Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: report of two cases and literature review
title_full Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: report of two cases and literature review
title_fullStr Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: report of two cases and literature review
title_full_unstemmed Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: report of two cases and literature review
title_short Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: report of two cases and literature review
title_sort primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: report of two cases and literature review
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29507528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12907-018-0070-7
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoziming primaryhepaticneuroendocrinecarcinomareportoftwocasesandliteraturereview
AT wangjin primaryhepaticneuroendocrinecarcinomareportoftwocasesandliteraturereview
AT ugwuowougochukwuc primaryhepaticneuroendocrinecarcinomareportoftwocasesandliteraturereview
AT wangliming primaryhepaticneuroendocrinecarcinomareportoftwocasesandliteraturereview
AT townsendjeffreyp primaryhepaticneuroendocrinecarcinomareportoftwocasesandliteraturereview