Cargando…
Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry
BACKGROUND: In the field of biomarker validation with mass spectrometry, controlling the technical variability is a critical issue. In selected reaction monitoring (SRM) measurements, this issue provides the opportunity of using variance component analysis to distinguish various sources of variabili...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29490628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2075-8 |
_version_ | 1783303209204318208 |
---|---|
author | Klich, Amna Mercier, Catherine Gerfault, Laurent Grangeat, Pierre Beaulieu, Corinne Degout-Charmette, Elodie Fortin, Tanguy Mahé, Pierre Giovannelli, Jean-François Charrier, Jean-Philippe Giremus, Audrey Maucort-Boulch, Delphine Roy, Pascal |
author_facet | Klich, Amna Mercier, Catherine Gerfault, Laurent Grangeat, Pierre Beaulieu, Corinne Degout-Charmette, Elodie Fortin, Tanguy Mahé, Pierre Giovannelli, Jean-François Charrier, Jean-Philippe Giremus, Audrey Maucort-Boulch, Delphine Roy, Pascal |
author_sort | Klich, Amna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the field of biomarker validation with mass spectrometry, controlling the technical variability is a critical issue. In selected reaction monitoring (SRM) measurements, this issue provides the opportunity of using variance component analysis to distinguish various sources of variability. However, in case of unbalanced data (unequal number of observations in all factor combinations), the classical methods cannot correctly estimate the various sources of variability, particularly in presence of interaction. The present paper proposes an extension of the variance component analysis to estimate the various components of the variance, including an interaction component in case of unbalanced data. RESULTS: We applied an experimental design that uses a serial dilution to generate known relative protein concentrations and estimated these concentrations by two processing algorithms, a classical and a more recent one. The extended method allowed estimating the variances explained by the dilution and the technical process by each algorithm in an experiment with 9 proteins: L-FABP, 14.3.3 sigma, Calgi, Def.A6, Villin, Calmo, I-FABP, Peroxi-5, and S100A14. Whereas, the recent algorithm gave a higher dilution variance and a lower technical variance than the classical one in two proteins with three peptides (L-FABP and Villin), there were no significant difference between the two algorithms on all proteins. CONCLUSIONS: The extension of the variance component analysis was able to estimate correctly the variance components of protein concentration measurement in case of unbalanced design. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2075-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5831836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58318362018-03-05 Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry Klich, Amna Mercier, Catherine Gerfault, Laurent Grangeat, Pierre Beaulieu, Corinne Degout-Charmette, Elodie Fortin, Tanguy Mahé, Pierre Giovannelli, Jean-François Charrier, Jean-Philippe Giremus, Audrey Maucort-Boulch, Delphine Roy, Pascal BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: In the field of biomarker validation with mass spectrometry, controlling the technical variability is a critical issue. In selected reaction monitoring (SRM) measurements, this issue provides the opportunity of using variance component analysis to distinguish various sources of variability. However, in case of unbalanced data (unequal number of observations in all factor combinations), the classical methods cannot correctly estimate the various sources of variability, particularly in presence of interaction. The present paper proposes an extension of the variance component analysis to estimate the various components of the variance, including an interaction component in case of unbalanced data. RESULTS: We applied an experimental design that uses a serial dilution to generate known relative protein concentrations and estimated these concentrations by two processing algorithms, a classical and a more recent one. The extended method allowed estimating the variances explained by the dilution and the technical process by each algorithm in an experiment with 9 proteins: L-FABP, 14.3.3 sigma, Calgi, Def.A6, Villin, Calmo, I-FABP, Peroxi-5, and S100A14. Whereas, the recent algorithm gave a higher dilution variance and a lower technical variance than the classical one in two proteins with three peptides (L-FABP and Villin), there were no significant difference between the two algorithms on all proteins. CONCLUSIONS: The extension of the variance component analysis was able to estimate correctly the variance components of protein concentration measurement in case of unbalanced design. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2075-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5831836/ /pubmed/29490628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2075-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Klich, Amna Mercier, Catherine Gerfault, Laurent Grangeat, Pierre Beaulieu, Corinne Degout-Charmette, Elodie Fortin, Tanguy Mahé, Pierre Giovannelli, Jean-François Charrier, Jean-Philippe Giremus, Audrey Maucort-Boulch, Delphine Roy, Pascal Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry |
title | Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry |
title_full | Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry |
title_fullStr | Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry |
title_short | Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry |
title_sort | variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29490628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2075-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klichamna variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry AT merciercatherine variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry AT gerfaultlaurent variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry AT grangeatpierre variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry AT beaulieucorinne variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry AT degoutcharmetteelodie variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry AT fortintanguy variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry AT mahepierre variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry AT giovannellijeanfrancois variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry AT charrierjeanphilippe variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry AT giremusaudrey variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry AT maucortboulchdelphine variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry AT roypascal variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry |