Cargando…

Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry

BACKGROUND: In the field of biomarker validation with mass spectrometry, controlling the technical variability is a critical issue. In selected reaction monitoring (SRM) measurements, this issue provides the opportunity of using variance component analysis to distinguish various sources of variabili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klich, Amna, Mercier, Catherine, Gerfault, Laurent, Grangeat, Pierre, Beaulieu, Corinne, Degout-Charmette, Elodie, Fortin, Tanguy, Mahé, Pierre, Giovannelli, Jean-François, Charrier, Jean-Philippe, Giremus, Audrey, Maucort-Boulch, Delphine, Roy, Pascal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29490628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2075-8
_version_ 1783303209204318208
author Klich, Amna
Mercier, Catherine
Gerfault, Laurent
Grangeat, Pierre
Beaulieu, Corinne
Degout-Charmette, Elodie
Fortin, Tanguy
Mahé, Pierre
Giovannelli, Jean-François
Charrier, Jean-Philippe
Giremus, Audrey
Maucort-Boulch, Delphine
Roy, Pascal
author_facet Klich, Amna
Mercier, Catherine
Gerfault, Laurent
Grangeat, Pierre
Beaulieu, Corinne
Degout-Charmette, Elodie
Fortin, Tanguy
Mahé, Pierre
Giovannelli, Jean-François
Charrier, Jean-Philippe
Giremus, Audrey
Maucort-Boulch, Delphine
Roy, Pascal
author_sort Klich, Amna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the field of biomarker validation with mass spectrometry, controlling the technical variability is a critical issue. In selected reaction monitoring (SRM) measurements, this issue provides the opportunity of using variance component analysis to distinguish various sources of variability. However, in case of unbalanced data (unequal number of observations in all factor combinations), the classical methods cannot correctly estimate the various sources of variability, particularly in presence of interaction. The present paper proposes an extension of the variance component analysis to estimate the various components of the variance, including an interaction component in case of unbalanced data. RESULTS: We applied an experimental design that uses a serial dilution to generate known relative protein concentrations and estimated these concentrations by two processing algorithms, a classical and a more recent one. The extended method allowed estimating the variances explained by the dilution and the technical process by each algorithm in an experiment with 9 proteins: L-FABP, 14.3.3 sigma, Calgi, Def.A6, Villin, Calmo, I-FABP, Peroxi-5, and S100A14. Whereas, the recent algorithm gave a higher dilution variance and a lower technical variance than the classical one in two proteins with three peptides (L-FABP and Villin), there were no significant difference between the two algorithms on all proteins. CONCLUSIONS: The extension of the variance component analysis was able to estimate correctly the variance components of protein concentration measurement in case of unbalanced design. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2075-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5831836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58318362018-03-05 Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry Klich, Amna Mercier, Catherine Gerfault, Laurent Grangeat, Pierre Beaulieu, Corinne Degout-Charmette, Elodie Fortin, Tanguy Mahé, Pierre Giovannelli, Jean-François Charrier, Jean-Philippe Giremus, Audrey Maucort-Boulch, Delphine Roy, Pascal BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: In the field of biomarker validation with mass spectrometry, controlling the technical variability is a critical issue. In selected reaction monitoring (SRM) measurements, this issue provides the opportunity of using variance component analysis to distinguish various sources of variability. However, in case of unbalanced data (unequal number of observations in all factor combinations), the classical methods cannot correctly estimate the various sources of variability, particularly in presence of interaction. The present paper proposes an extension of the variance component analysis to estimate the various components of the variance, including an interaction component in case of unbalanced data. RESULTS: We applied an experimental design that uses a serial dilution to generate known relative protein concentrations and estimated these concentrations by two processing algorithms, a classical and a more recent one. The extended method allowed estimating the variances explained by the dilution and the technical process by each algorithm in an experiment with 9 proteins: L-FABP, 14.3.3 sigma, Calgi, Def.A6, Villin, Calmo, I-FABP, Peroxi-5, and S100A14. Whereas, the recent algorithm gave a higher dilution variance and a lower technical variance than the classical one in two proteins with three peptides (L-FABP and Villin), there were no significant difference between the two algorithms on all proteins. CONCLUSIONS: The extension of the variance component analysis was able to estimate correctly the variance components of protein concentration measurement in case of unbalanced design. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2075-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5831836/ /pubmed/29490628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2075-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Klich, Amna
Mercier, Catherine
Gerfault, Laurent
Grangeat, Pierre
Beaulieu, Corinne
Degout-Charmette, Elodie
Fortin, Tanguy
Mahé, Pierre
Giovannelli, Jean-François
Charrier, Jean-Philippe
Giremus, Audrey
Maucort-Boulch, Delphine
Roy, Pascal
Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry
title Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry
title_full Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry
title_fullStr Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry
title_short Variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry
title_sort variance component analysis to assess protein quantification in biomarker validation: application to selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29490628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2075-8
work_keys_str_mv AT klichamna variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry
AT merciercatherine variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry
AT gerfaultlaurent variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry
AT grangeatpierre variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry
AT beaulieucorinne variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry
AT degoutcharmetteelodie variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry
AT fortintanguy variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry
AT mahepierre variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry
AT giovannellijeanfrancois variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry
AT charrierjeanphilippe variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry
AT giremusaudrey variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry
AT maucortboulchdelphine variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry
AT roypascal variancecomponentanalysistoassessproteinquantificationinbiomarkervalidationapplicationtoselectedreactionmonitoringmassspectrometry