Cargando…

Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction

PURPOSE: To compare the through-focus visual performance in a clinical population of pseudophakic patients implanted with two new trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and one extended depth of focus IOL. METHODS: Prospective, nonrandomized, examiner-masked case series. Twenty-three patients received t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Escandón-García, Santiago, Ribeiro, Filomena J., McAlinden, Colm, Queirós, António, González-Méijome, José M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29651343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6165493
_version_ 1783303218721193984
author Escandón-García, Santiago
Ribeiro, Filomena J.
McAlinden, Colm
Queirós, António
González-Méijome, José M.
author_facet Escandón-García, Santiago
Ribeiro, Filomena J.
McAlinden, Colm
Queirós, António
González-Méijome, José M.
author_sort Escandón-García, Santiago
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the through-focus visual performance in a clinical population of pseudophakic patients implanted with two new trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and one extended depth of focus IOL. METHODS: Prospective, nonrandomized, examiner-masked case series. Twenty-three patients received the FineVision® and seven patients received the PanOptix™ trifocal IOLs. Fifteen patients received the Symfony extended depth of focus IOL. Mean age of patients was 63 ± 8 years. Through-focus visual acuity was measured from –3.00 to +1.00 D vergences. Contrast sensitivity was measured with and without a source of glare. Light disturbances were evaluated with the Light Distortion Analyzer. RESULTS: Though-focus evaluation showed that trifocal IOLs performed significantly better at near distance (33 and 40 cm), and extended depth of focus performed significantly better at intermediate distance (1.0 m). Contrast sensitivity function with glare and dysphotopsia was similar between the three IOLs and subjective response to questionnaire showed a significantly higher score (worse performance) for the extended depth of focus IOL compared to both trifocal IOLs in the bothersome subscale (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Trifocal IOLs grant better performance at near distance while extended depth of focus IOL performs better at intermediate distance. Objective dysphotopsia measured with the Light Distortion Analyzer is not reduced in extended depth of focus IOL compared to trifocal IOLs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5831879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58318792018-04-12 Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction Escandón-García, Santiago Ribeiro, Filomena J. McAlinden, Colm Queirós, António González-Méijome, José M. J Ophthalmol Clinical Study PURPOSE: To compare the through-focus visual performance in a clinical population of pseudophakic patients implanted with two new trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and one extended depth of focus IOL. METHODS: Prospective, nonrandomized, examiner-masked case series. Twenty-three patients received the FineVision® and seven patients received the PanOptix™ trifocal IOLs. Fifteen patients received the Symfony extended depth of focus IOL. Mean age of patients was 63 ± 8 years. Through-focus visual acuity was measured from –3.00 to +1.00 D vergences. Contrast sensitivity was measured with and without a source of glare. Light disturbances were evaluated with the Light Distortion Analyzer. RESULTS: Though-focus evaluation showed that trifocal IOLs performed significantly better at near distance (33 and 40 cm), and extended depth of focus performed significantly better at intermediate distance (1.0 m). Contrast sensitivity function with glare and dysphotopsia was similar between the three IOLs and subjective response to questionnaire showed a significantly higher score (worse performance) for the extended depth of focus IOL compared to both trifocal IOLs in the bothersome subscale (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Trifocal IOLs grant better performance at near distance while extended depth of focus IOL performs better at intermediate distance. Objective dysphotopsia measured with the Light Distortion Analyzer is not reduced in extended depth of focus IOL compared to trifocal IOLs. Hindawi 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5831879/ /pubmed/29651343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6165493 Text en Copyright © 2018 Santiago Escandón-García et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Escandón-García, Santiago
Ribeiro, Filomena J.
McAlinden, Colm
Queirós, António
González-Méijome, José M.
Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction
title Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction
title_full Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction
title_fullStr Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction
title_full_unstemmed Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction
title_short Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction
title_sort through-focus vision performance and light disturbances of 3 new intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5831879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29651343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6165493
work_keys_str_mv AT escandongarciasantiago throughfocusvisionperformanceandlightdisturbancesof3newintraocularlensesforpresbyopiacorrection
AT ribeirofilomenaj throughfocusvisionperformanceandlightdisturbancesof3newintraocularlensesforpresbyopiacorrection
AT mcalindencolm throughfocusvisionperformanceandlightdisturbancesof3newintraocularlensesforpresbyopiacorrection
AT queirosantonio throughfocusvisionperformanceandlightdisturbancesof3newintraocularlensesforpresbyopiacorrection
AT gonzalezmeijomejosem throughfocusvisionperformanceandlightdisturbancesof3newintraocularlensesforpresbyopiacorrection