Cargando…

A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach

Probiotics are live microbial feed supplements that promote growth and health to the host by minimizing non-essential and pathogenic microorganisms in the host’s gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The campaign to minimize excessive use of antibiotics in poultry production has necessitated development of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhogoju, Sarayu, Nahashon, Samuel, Wang, Xiaofei, Darris, Carl, Kilonzo-Nthenge, Agnes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5832216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29494648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191029
_version_ 1783303288179916800
author Bhogoju, Sarayu
Nahashon, Samuel
Wang, Xiaofei
Darris, Carl
Kilonzo-Nthenge, Agnes
author_facet Bhogoju, Sarayu
Nahashon, Samuel
Wang, Xiaofei
Darris, Carl
Kilonzo-Nthenge, Agnes
author_sort Bhogoju, Sarayu
collection PubMed
description Probiotics are live microbial feed supplements that promote growth and health to the host by minimizing non-essential and pathogenic microorganisms in the host’s gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The campaign to minimize excessive use of antibiotics in poultry production has necessitated development of probiotics with broad application in multiple poultry species. Design of such probiotics requires understanding of the diversity or similarity in microbial profiles among avian species of economic importance. Therefore, the objective of this research was to establish and compare the microbial profiles of the GIT of Guinea fowl and chicken and to establish the microbial diversity or similarity between the two avian species. A metagenomic approach consisting of the amplification and sequence analysis of the hypervariable regions V1-V9 of the 16S rRNA gene was used to identify the GIT microbes. Collectively, we detected more than 150 microbial families. The total number of microbial species detected in the chicken GIT was higher than that found in the Guinea Fowl GIT. Our studies also revealed phylogenetic diversity among the microbial species found in chicken and guinea fowl. The phylum Firmicutes was most abundant in both avian species whereas Phylum Actinobacteria was most abundant in chickens than Guinea fowls. The diversity of the microbial profiles found in broiler chickens and Guinea fowls suggest that the design of effective avian probiotics would require species specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5832216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58322162018-03-19 A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach Bhogoju, Sarayu Nahashon, Samuel Wang, Xiaofei Darris, Carl Kilonzo-Nthenge, Agnes PLoS One Research Article Probiotics are live microbial feed supplements that promote growth and health to the host by minimizing non-essential and pathogenic microorganisms in the host’s gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The campaign to minimize excessive use of antibiotics in poultry production has necessitated development of probiotics with broad application in multiple poultry species. Design of such probiotics requires understanding of the diversity or similarity in microbial profiles among avian species of economic importance. Therefore, the objective of this research was to establish and compare the microbial profiles of the GIT of Guinea fowl and chicken and to establish the microbial diversity or similarity between the two avian species. A metagenomic approach consisting of the amplification and sequence analysis of the hypervariable regions V1-V9 of the 16S rRNA gene was used to identify the GIT microbes. Collectively, we detected more than 150 microbial families. The total number of microbial species detected in the chicken GIT was higher than that found in the Guinea Fowl GIT. Our studies also revealed phylogenetic diversity among the microbial species found in chicken and guinea fowl. The phylum Firmicutes was most abundant in both avian species whereas Phylum Actinobacteria was most abundant in chickens than Guinea fowls. The diversity of the microbial profiles found in broiler chickens and Guinea fowls suggest that the design of effective avian probiotics would require species specificity. Public Library of Science 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5832216/ /pubmed/29494648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191029 Text en © 2018 Bhogoju et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bhogoju, Sarayu
Nahashon, Samuel
Wang, Xiaofei
Darris, Carl
Kilonzo-Nthenge, Agnes
A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach
title A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach
title_full A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach
title_short A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach
title_sort comparative analysis of microbial profile of guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5832216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29494648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191029
work_keys_str_mv AT bhogojusarayu acomparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach
AT nahashonsamuel acomparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach
AT wangxiaofei acomparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach
AT darriscarl acomparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach
AT kilonzonthengeagnes acomparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach
AT bhogojusarayu comparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach
AT nahashonsamuel comparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach
AT wangxiaofei comparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach
AT darriscarl comparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach
AT kilonzonthengeagnes comparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach