Cargando…
A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach
Probiotics are live microbial feed supplements that promote growth and health to the host by minimizing non-essential and pathogenic microorganisms in the host’s gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The campaign to minimize excessive use of antibiotics in poultry production has necessitated development of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5832216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29494648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191029 |
_version_ | 1783303288179916800 |
---|---|
author | Bhogoju, Sarayu Nahashon, Samuel Wang, Xiaofei Darris, Carl Kilonzo-Nthenge, Agnes |
author_facet | Bhogoju, Sarayu Nahashon, Samuel Wang, Xiaofei Darris, Carl Kilonzo-Nthenge, Agnes |
author_sort | Bhogoju, Sarayu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Probiotics are live microbial feed supplements that promote growth and health to the host by minimizing non-essential and pathogenic microorganisms in the host’s gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The campaign to minimize excessive use of antibiotics in poultry production has necessitated development of probiotics with broad application in multiple poultry species. Design of such probiotics requires understanding of the diversity or similarity in microbial profiles among avian species of economic importance. Therefore, the objective of this research was to establish and compare the microbial profiles of the GIT of Guinea fowl and chicken and to establish the microbial diversity or similarity between the two avian species. A metagenomic approach consisting of the amplification and sequence analysis of the hypervariable regions V1-V9 of the 16S rRNA gene was used to identify the GIT microbes. Collectively, we detected more than 150 microbial families. The total number of microbial species detected in the chicken GIT was higher than that found in the Guinea Fowl GIT. Our studies also revealed phylogenetic diversity among the microbial species found in chicken and guinea fowl. The phylum Firmicutes was most abundant in both avian species whereas Phylum Actinobacteria was most abundant in chickens than Guinea fowls. The diversity of the microbial profiles found in broiler chickens and Guinea fowls suggest that the design of effective avian probiotics would require species specificity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5832216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58322162018-03-19 A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach Bhogoju, Sarayu Nahashon, Samuel Wang, Xiaofei Darris, Carl Kilonzo-Nthenge, Agnes PLoS One Research Article Probiotics are live microbial feed supplements that promote growth and health to the host by minimizing non-essential and pathogenic microorganisms in the host’s gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The campaign to minimize excessive use of antibiotics in poultry production has necessitated development of probiotics with broad application in multiple poultry species. Design of such probiotics requires understanding of the diversity or similarity in microbial profiles among avian species of economic importance. Therefore, the objective of this research was to establish and compare the microbial profiles of the GIT of Guinea fowl and chicken and to establish the microbial diversity or similarity between the two avian species. A metagenomic approach consisting of the amplification and sequence analysis of the hypervariable regions V1-V9 of the 16S rRNA gene was used to identify the GIT microbes. Collectively, we detected more than 150 microbial families. The total number of microbial species detected in the chicken GIT was higher than that found in the Guinea Fowl GIT. Our studies also revealed phylogenetic diversity among the microbial species found in chicken and guinea fowl. The phylum Firmicutes was most abundant in both avian species whereas Phylum Actinobacteria was most abundant in chickens than Guinea fowls. The diversity of the microbial profiles found in broiler chickens and Guinea fowls suggest that the design of effective avian probiotics would require species specificity. Public Library of Science 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5832216/ /pubmed/29494648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191029 Text en © 2018 Bhogoju et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bhogoju, Sarayu Nahashon, Samuel Wang, Xiaofei Darris, Carl Kilonzo-Nthenge, Agnes A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach |
title | A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach |
title_full | A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach |
title_fullStr | A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach |
title_short | A comparative analysis of microbial profile of Guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach |
title_sort | comparative analysis of microbial profile of guinea fowl and chicken using metagenomic approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5832216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29494648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhogojusarayu acomparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach AT nahashonsamuel acomparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach AT wangxiaofei acomparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach AT darriscarl acomparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach AT kilonzonthengeagnes acomparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach AT bhogojusarayu comparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach AT nahashonsamuel comparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach AT wangxiaofei comparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach AT darriscarl comparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach AT kilonzonthengeagnes comparativeanalysisofmicrobialprofileofguineafowlandchickenusingmetagenomicapproach |