Cargando…

On the Inclusion of Short-distance Bystander Effects into a Logistic Tumor Control Probability Model

Currently, interactions between voxels are neglected in the tumor control probability (TCP) models used in biologically-driven intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment planning. However, experimental data suggests that this may not always be justified when bystander effects are important. We propo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tempel, David G, Brodin, N. Patrik, Tomé, Wolfgang A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5832408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515941
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2012
_version_ 1783303316642463744
author Tempel, David G
Brodin, N. Patrik
Tomé, Wolfgang A
author_facet Tempel, David G
Brodin, N. Patrik
Tomé, Wolfgang A
author_sort Tempel, David G
collection PubMed
description Currently, interactions between voxels are neglected in the tumor control probability (TCP) models used in biologically-driven intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment planning. However, experimental data suggests that this may not always be justified when bystander effects are important. We propose a model inspired by the Ising model, a short-range interaction model, to investigate if and when it is important to include voxel to voxel interactions in biologically-driven treatment planning. This Ising-like model for TCP is derived by first showing that the logistic model of tumor control is mathematically equivalent to a non-interacting Ising model. Using this correspondence, the parameters of the logistic model are mapped to the parameters of an Ising-like model and bystander interactions are introduced as a short-range interaction as is the case for the Ising model. As an example, we apply the model to study the effect of bystander interactions in the case of radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The model shows that it is adequate to neglect bystander interactions for dose distributions that completely cover the treatment target and yield TCP estimates that lie in the shoulder of the dose response curve. However, for dose distributions that yield TCP estimates that lie on the steep part of the dose response curve or for inhomogeneous dose distributions having significant hot and/or cold regions, bystander effects may be important. Furthermore, the proposed model highlights a previously unexplored and potentially fruitful connection between the fields of statistical mechanics and tumor control probability/normal tissue complication probability modeling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5832408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58324082018-03-07 On the Inclusion of Short-distance Bystander Effects into a Logistic Tumor Control Probability Model Tempel, David G Brodin, N. Patrik Tomé, Wolfgang A Cureus Medical Physics Currently, interactions between voxels are neglected in the tumor control probability (TCP) models used in biologically-driven intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment planning. However, experimental data suggests that this may not always be justified when bystander effects are important. We propose a model inspired by the Ising model, a short-range interaction model, to investigate if and when it is important to include voxel to voxel interactions in biologically-driven treatment planning. This Ising-like model for TCP is derived by first showing that the logistic model of tumor control is mathematically equivalent to a non-interacting Ising model. Using this correspondence, the parameters of the logistic model are mapped to the parameters of an Ising-like model and bystander interactions are introduced as a short-range interaction as is the case for the Ising model. As an example, we apply the model to study the effect of bystander interactions in the case of radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The model shows that it is adequate to neglect bystander interactions for dose distributions that completely cover the treatment target and yield TCP estimates that lie in the shoulder of the dose response curve. However, for dose distributions that yield TCP estimates that lie on the steep part of the dose response curve or for inhomogeneous dose distributions having significant hot and/or cold regions, bystander effects may be important. Furthermore, the proposed model highlights a previously unexplored and potentially fruitful connection between the fields of statistical mechanics and tumor control probability/normal tissue complication probability modeling. Cureus 2018-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5832408/ /pubmed/29515941 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2012 Text en Copyright © 2018, Tempel et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Physics
Tempel, David G
Brodin, N. Patrik
Tomé, Wolfgang A
On the Inclusion of Short-distance Bystander Effects into a Logistic Tumor Control Probability Model
title On the Inclusion of Short-distance Bystander Effects into a Logistic Tumor Control Probability Model
title_full On the Inclusion of Short-distance Bystander Effects into a Logistic Tumor Control Probability Model
title_fullStr On the Inclusion of Short-distance Bystander Effects into a Logistic Tumor Control Probability Model
title_full_unstemmed On the Inclusion of Short-distance Bystander Effects into a Logistic Tumor Control Probability Model
title_short On the Inclusion of Short-distance Bystander Effects into a Logistic Tumor Control Probability Model
title_sort on the inclusion of short-distance bystander effects into a logistic tumor control probability model
topic Medical Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5832408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515941
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2012
work_keys_str_mv AT tempeldavidg ontheinclusionofshortdistancebystandereffectsintoalogistictumorcontrolprobabilitymodel
AT brodinnpatrik ontheinclusionofshortdistancebystandereffectsintoalogistictumorcontrolprobabilitymodel
AT tomewolfganga ontheinclusionofshortdistancebystandereffectsintoalogistictumorcontrolprobabilitymodel