Cargando…
Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis
BACKGROUND: Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) promotes high-quality, cost-effective care. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate adherence to standardized classification (Prague Criteria) and systematic (four-quadrant) bio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5832463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29507870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-101351 |
_version_ | 1783303326773805056 |
---|---|
author | Westerveld, Donevan Khullar, Vikas Mramba, Lazarus Ayoub, Fares Brar, Tony Agarwal, Mitali Forde, Justin Chakraborty, Joydeep Riverso, Michael Perbtani, Yaseen B. Gupte, Anand Forsmark, Chris E. Draganov, Peter Yang, Dennis |
author_facet | Westerveld, Donevan Khullar, Vikas Mramba, Lazarus Ayoub, Fares Brar, Tony Agarwal, Mitali Forde, Justin Chakraborty, Joydeep Riverso, Michael Perbtani, Yaseen B. Gupte, Anand Forsmark, Chris E. Draganov, Peter Yang, Dennis |
author_sort | Westerveld, Donevan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) promotes high-quality, cost-effective care. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate adherence to standardized classification (Prague Criteria) and systematic (four-quadrant) biopsy protocol, (2) to identify predictors of practice patterns, and (3) to assess adherence to surveillance guidelines for non-dysplastic BE (NDBE). METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) performed for BE (June 2008 to December 2015). Patient demographics, procedure characteristics, and histology results were obtained from the procedure report-generating database and chart review. Adherence to Prague Criteria and systematic biopsies was based on operative report documentation. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of practice patterns. Guideline adherent surveillance EGD was defined as those performed within 6 months of the recommended 3- to 5-year interval. RESULTS: In total, 397 patients (66.5 % male; mean age 60.1 ± 12.5 years) had an index EGD during the study period. Adherence to Prague Criteria and systematic biopsies was 27.4 % and 24.1 %, respectively. Endoscopists who performed therapeutic interventions for BE were more likely to use the Prague Criteria (OR: 3.16; 95 %CI: 1.47 – 6.82; P < 0.01) than those who did not. Longer time in practice was positively associated with adherence to Prague Criteria (OR 1.07; 95 %CI: 1.02 – 1.12; P < 0.01) but with a lower likelihood of performing systematic biopsies (OR 0.91; 95 %CI: 0.85 – 0.97; P < 0.01). More than half (55.6 %) of patients with NDBE underwent surveillance EGD sooner (range 1 – 29 months) than the recommended interval. CONCLUSION: Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in BE is low. Operator characteristics, including experience with endoscopic therapy for BE and time in practice predicted practice pattern. Future efforts are needed to reduce variability in practice and promote high-value care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5832463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58324632018-03-05 Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis Westerveld, Donevan Khullar, Vikas Mramba, Lazarus Ayoub, Fares Brar, Tony Agarwal, Mitali Forde, Justin Chakraborty, Joydeep Riverso, Michael Perbtani, Yaseen B. Gupte, Anand Forsmark, Chris E. Draganov, Peter Yang, Dennis Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND: Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) promotes high-quality, cost-effective care. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate adherence to standardized classification (Prague Criteria) and systematic (four-quadrant) biopsy protocol, (2) to identify predictors of practice patterns, and (3) to assess adherence to surveillance guidelines for non-dysplastic BE (NDBE). METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) performed for BE (June 2008 to December 2015). Patient demographics, procedure characteristics, and histology results were obtained from the procedure report-generating database and chart review. Adherence to Prague Criteria and systematic biopsies was based on operative report documentation. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of practice patterns. Guideline adherent surveillance EGD was defined as those performed within 6 months of the recommended 3- to 5-year interval. RESULTS: In total, 397 patients (66.5 % male; mean age 60.1 ± 12.5 years) had an index EGD during the study period. Adherence to Prague Criteria and systematic biopsies was 27.4 % and 24.1 %, respectively. Endoscopists who performed therapeutic interventions for BE were more likely to use the Prague Criteria (OR: 3.16; 95 %CI: 1.47 – 6.82; P < 0.01) than those who did not. Longer time in practice was positively associated with adherence to Prague Criteria (OR 1.07; 95 %CI: 1.02 – 1.12; P < 0.01) but with a lower likelihood of performing systematic biopsies (OR 0.91; 95 %CI: 0.85 – 0.97; P < 0.01). More than half (55.6 %) of patients with NDBE underwent surveillance EGD sooner (range 1 – 29 months) than the recommended interval. CONCLUSION: Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in BE is low. Operator characteristics, including experience with endoscopic therapy for BE and time in practice predicted practice pattern. Future efforts are needed to reduce variability in practice and promote high-value care. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-03 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5832463/ /pubmed/29507870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-101351 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Westerveld, Donevan Khullar, Vikas Mramba, Lazarus Ayoub, Fares Brar, Tony Agarwal, Mitali Forde, Justin Chakraborty, Joydeep Riverso, Michael Perbtani, Yaseen B. Gupte, Anand Forsmark, Chris E. Draganov, Peter Yang, Dennis Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis |
title | Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis |
title_full | Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis |
title_short | Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis |
title_sort | adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5832463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29507870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-101351 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT westervelddonevan adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis AT khullarvikas adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis AT mrambalazarus adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis AT ayoubfares adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis AT brartony adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis AT agarwalmitali adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis AT fordejustin adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis AT chakrabortyjoydeep adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis AT riversomichael adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis AT perbtaniyaseenb adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis AT gupteanand adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis AT forsmarkchrise adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis AT draganovpeter adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis AT yangdennis adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis |