Cargando…

Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND:  Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) promotes high-quality, cost-effective care. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate adherence to standardized classification (Prague Criteria) and systematic (four-quadrant) bio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westerveld, Donevan, Khullar, Vikas, Mramba, Lazarus, Ayoub, Fares, Brar, Tony, Agarwal, Mitali, Forde, Justin, Chakraborty, Joydeep, Riverso, Michael, Perbtani, Yaseen B., Gupte, Anand, Forsmark, Chris E., Draganov, Peter, Yang, Dennis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5832463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29507870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-101351
_version_ 1783303326773805056
author Westerveld, Donevan
Khullar, Vikas
Mramba, Lazarus
Ayoub, Fares
Brar, Tony
Agarwal, Mitali
Forde, Justin
Chakraborty, Joydeep
Riverso, Michael
Perbtani, Yaseen B.
Gupte, Anand
Forsmark, Chris E.
Draganov, Peter
Yang, Dennis
author_facet Westerveld, Donevan
Khullar, Vikas
Mramba, Lazarus
Ayoub, Fares
Brar, Tony
Agarwal, Mitali
Forde, Justin
Chakraborty, Joydeep
Riverso, Michael
Perbtani, Yaseen B.
Gupte, Anand
Forsmark, Chris E.
Draganov, Peter
Yang, Dennis
author_sort Westerveld, Donevan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND:  Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) promotes high-quality, cost-effective care. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate adherence to standardized classification (Prague Criteria) and systematic (four-quadrant) biopsy protocol, (2) to identify predictors of practice patterns, and (3) to assess adherence to surveillance guidelines for non-dysplastic BE (NDBE). METHODS:  This was a single-center retrospective study of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) performed for BE (June 2008 to December 2015). Patient demographics, procedure characteristics, and histology results were obtained from the procedure report-generating database and chart review. Adherence to Prague Criteria and systematic biopsies was based on operative report documentation. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of practice patterns. Guideline adherent surveillance EGD was defined as those performed within 6 months of the recommended 3- to 5-year interval. RESULTS:  In total, 397 patients (66.5 % male; mean age 60.1 ± 12.5 years) had an index EGD during the study period. Adherence to Prague Criteria and systematic biopsies was 27.4 % and 24.1 %, respectively. Endoscopists who performed therapeutic interventions for BE were more likely to use the Prague Criteria (OR: 3.16; 95 %CI: 1.47 – 6.82; P  < 0.01) than those who did not. Longer time in practice was positively associated with adherence to Prague Criteria (OR 1.07; 95 %CI: 1.02 – 1.12; P  < 0.01) but with a lower likelihood of performing systematic biopsies (OR 0.91; 95 %CI: 0.85 – 0.97; P  < 0.01). More than half (55.6 %) of patients with NDBE underwent surveillance EGD sooner (range 1 – 29 months) than the recommended interval. CONCLUSION:  Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in BE is low. Operator characteristics, including experience with endoscopic therapy for BE and time in practice predicted practice pattern. Future efforts are needed to reduce variability in practice and promote high-value care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5832463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58324632018-03-05 Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis Westerveld, Donevan Khullar, Vikas Mramba, Lazarus Ayoub, Fares Brar, Tony Agarwal, Mitali Forde, Justin Chakraborty, Joydeep Riverso, Michael Perbtani, Yaseen B. Gupte, Anand Forsmark, Chris E. Draganov, Peter Yang, Dennis Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND:  Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) promotes high-quality, cost-effective care. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate adherence to standardized classification (Prague Criteria) and systematic (four-quadrant) biopsy protocol, (2) to identify predictors of practice patterns, and (3) to assess adherence to surveillance guidelines for non-dysplastic BE (NDBE). METHODS:  This was a single-center retrospective study of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) performed for BE (June 2008 to December 2015). Patient demographics, procedure characteristics, and histology results were obtained from the procedure report-generating database and chart review. Adherence to Prague Criteria and systematic biopsies was based on operative report documentation. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of practice patterns. Guideline adherent surveillance EGD was defined as those performed within 6 months of the recommended 3- to 5-year interval. RESULTS:  In total, 397 patients (66.5 % male; mean age 60.1 ± 12.5 years) had an index EGD during the study period. Adherence to Prague Criteria and systematic biopsies was 27.4 % and 24.1 %, respectively. Endoscopists who performed therapeutic interventions for BE were more likely to use the Prague Criteria (OR: 3.16; 95 %CI: 1.47 – 6.82; P  < 0.01) than those who did not. Longer time in practice was positively associated with adherence to Prague Criteria (OR 1.07; 95 %CI: 1.02 – 1.12; P  < 0.01) but with a lower likelihood of performing systematic biopsies (OR 0.91; 95 %CI: 0.85 – 0.97; P  < 0.01). More than half (55.6 %) of patients with NDBE underwent surveillance EGD sooner (range 1 – 29 months) than the recommended interval. CONCLUSION:  Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in BE is low. Operator characteristics, including experience with endoscopic therapy for BE and time in practice predicted practice pattern. Future efforts are needed to reduce variability in practice and promote high-value care. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-03 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5832463/ /pubmed/29507870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-101351 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Westerveld, Donevan
Khullar, Vikas
Mramba, Lazarus
Ayoub, Fares
Brar, Tony
Agarwal, Mitali
Forde, Justin
Chakraborty, Joydeep
Riverso, Michael
Perbtani, Yaseen B.
Gupte, Anand
Forsmark, Chris E.
Draganov, Peter
Yang, Dennis
Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis
title Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis
title_full Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis
title_short Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis
title_sort adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5832463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29507870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-101351
work_keys_str_mv AT westervelddonevan adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis
AT khullarvikas adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis
AT mrambalazarus adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis
AT ayoubfares adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis
AT brartony adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis
AT agarwalmitali adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis
AT fordejustin adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis
AT chakrabortyjoydeep adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis
AT riversomichael adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis
AT perbtaniyaseenb adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis
AT gupteanand adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis
AT forsmarkchrise adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis
AT draganovpeter adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yangdennis adherencetoqualityindicatorsandsurveillanceguidelinesinthemanagementofbarrettsesophagusaretrospectiveanalysis