Cargando…
Cancer screening recommendations: an international comparison of high income countries
BACKGROUND: Recommendations regarding cancer screening vary from country to country, and may also vary within countries depending on the organization making the recommendations. The goal of this study was to summarize the cancer screening recommendations from the 21 countries with the highest per ca...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29507820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40985-018-0080-0 |
_version_ | 1783303411333070848 |
---|---|
author | Ebell, Mark H. Thai, Thuy Nhu Royalty, Kyle J. |
author_facet | Ebell, Mark H. Thai, Thuy Nhu Royalty, Kyle J. |
author_sort | Ebell, Mark H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recommendations regarding cancer screening vary from country to country, and may also vary within countries depending on the organization making the recommendations. The goal of this study was to summarize the cancer screening recommendations from the 21 countries with the highest per capita spending on healthcare. MAIN BODY: Cancer screening guidelines were identified for each country based on a review of the medical literature, internet searches, and contact with key informants in most countries. The highest level recommendation was identified for each country, in the order of national recommendation, cancer society recommendation, or medical specialty society recommendation. Breast cancer screening recommendations were generally consistent across countries, most commonly recommending mammography biennially from ages 50 to 69 or 70 years. In the USA, specialty societies generally offered more intensive screening recommendations. All countries also recommend cervical cancer screening, although there is some heterogeneity regarding the test (cytology or HPV or both) and the age of initiation and screening interval. Most countries recommend colorectal cancer screening using fecal immunochemical (FIT) testing, while only seven countries recommend general or selective screening for prostate cancer, and a similar number explicitly recommend against screening for prostate cancer. Screening for lung and skin cancer is only recommended by a few countries. Greater per capita healthcare expenditures are not associated with greater screening intensity, with the possible exception of prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for cancer screening differ between countries, with areas of commonality but also clear differences. Recommendations have important commonalities for well-established cancer screening programs such as breast and cervical cancer, with greater variation between countries regarding prostate, colorectal, lung, and skin cancer screening. Ideally, recommendations should be made by a professionally diverse, independent panel of experts that make evidence-based recommendations regarding screening based on the benefits, harms, and available resources in that country’s context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5833039 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58330392018-03-05 Cancer screening recommendations: an international comparison of high income countries Ebell, Mark H. Thai, Thuy Nhu Royalty, Kyle J. Public Health Rev Review BACKGROUND: Recommendations regarding cancer screening vary from country to country, and may also vary within countries depending on the organization making the recommendations. The goal of this study was to summarize the cancer screening recommendations from the 21 countries with the highest per capita spending on healthcare. MAIN BODY: Cancer screening guidelines were identified for each country based on a review of the medical literature, internet searches, and contact with key informants in most countries. The highest level recommendation was identified for each country, in the order of national recommendation, cancer society recommendation, or medical specialty society recommendation. Breast cancer screening recommendations were generally consistent across countries, most commonly recommending mammography biennially from ages 50 to 69 or 70 years. In the USA, specialty societies generally offered more intensive screening recommendations. All countries also recommend cervical cancer screening, although there is some heterogeneity regarding the test (cytology or HPV or both) and the age of initiation and screening interval. Most countries recommend colorectal cancer screening using fecal immunochemical (FIT) testing, while only seven countries recommend general or selective screening for prostate cancer, and a similar number explicitly recommend against screening for prostate cancer. Screening for lung and skin cancer is only recommended by a few countries. Greater per capita healthcare expenditures are not associated with greater screening intensity, with the possible exception of prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for cancer screening differ between countries, with areas of commonality but also clear differences. Recommendations have important commonalities for well-established cancer screening programs such as breast and cervical cancer, with greater variation between countries regarding prostate, colorectal, lung, and skin cancer screening. Ideally, recommendations should be made by a professionally diverse, independent panel of experts that make evidence-based recommendations regarding screening based on the benefits, harms, and available resources in that country’s context. BioMed Central 2018-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5833039/ /pubmed/29507820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40985-018-0080-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Ebell, Mark H. Thai, Thuy Nhu Royalty, Kyle J. Cancer screening recommendations: an international comparison of high income countries |
title | Cancer screening recommendations: an international comparison of high income countries |
title_full | Cancer screening recommendations: an international comparison of high income countries |
title_fullStr | Cancer screening recommendations: an international comparison of high income countries |
title_full_unstemmed | Cancer screening recommendations: an international comparison of high income countries |
title_short | Cancer screening recommendations: an international comparison of high income countries |
title_sort | cancer screening recommendations: an international comparison of high income countries |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29507820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40985-018-0080-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ebellmarkh cancerscreeningrecommendationsaninternationalcomparisonofhighincomecountries AT thaithuynhu cancerscreeningrecommendationsaninternationalcomparisonofhighincomecountries AT royaltykylej cancerscreeningrecommendationsaninternationalcomparisonofhighincomecountries |