Cargando…

Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain

OBJECTIVES: To validate the German version of OMPSQ (OMPSQ-G) for patients with chronic neck pain. RESULTS: After translating OMPSQ to German, we assessed the discriminant validity between patients and healthy adults. Convergent validity was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficients between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langenfeld, Anke, Bastiaenen, Carolien, Brunner, Florian, Swanenburg, Jaap
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29499753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3269-x
_version_ 1783303435830951936
author Langenfeld, Anke
Bastiaenen, Carolien
Brunner, Florian
Swanenburg, Jaap
author_facet Langenfeld, Anke
Bastiaenen, Carolien
Brunner, Florian
Swanenburg, Jaap
author_sort Langenfeld, Anke
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To validate the German version of OMPSQ (OMPSQ-G) for patients with chronic neck pain. RESULTS: After translating OMPSQ to German, we assessed the discriminant validity between patients and healthy adults. Convergent validity was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficients between domains of OMPSQ-G and the German version of neck disability index (NDI-G) and visual analogue scale (VAS) of neck pain intensity. Floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, test–retest and relative reliability were assessed. Fifty patients with chronic neck pain (mean age, 43.6 years; 34 females) and 24 healthy adults (mean age, 50.4 years; 18 females) participated. Mann–Whitney U tests showed significant differences in OMPSQ scores between both groups at the baseline (z = − 4.6; p < 0.001) and second time point (z = − 4.8; p < 0.001). OMPSQ-G scores highly and moderately correlated with NDI-G (ρ = 0.70) and VAS (ρ = 0.41) scores, respectively. There were no floor or ceiling effects. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94. OMPSQ-G showed high reliability (intraclass correlation 2.1: 0.93; standard error of measurement, 6.9; smallest detectable change, 20 points). The Bland–Altman plot indicated no systematic error. OMPSQ-G showed good validity and reliability in patients with neck pain. Trial registration NCT02540343 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3269-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5833147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58331472018-03-05 Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain Langenfeld, Anke Bastiaenen, Carolien Brunner, Florian Swanenburg, Jaap BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVES: To validate the German version of OMPSQ (OMPSQ-G) for patients with chronic neck pain. RESULTS: After translating OMPSQ to German, we assessed the discriminant validity between patients and healthy adults. Convergent validity was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficients between domains of OMPSQ-G and the German version of neck disability index (NDI-G) and visual analogue scale (VAS) of neck pain intensity. Floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, test–retest and relative reliability were assessed. Fifty patients with chronic neck pain (mean age, 43.6 years; 34 females) and 24 healthy adults (mean age, 50.4 years; 18 females) participated. Mann–Whitney U tests showed significant differences in OMPSQ scores between both groups at the baseline (z = − 4.6; p < 0.001) and second time point (z = − 4.8; p < 0.001). OMPSQ-G scores highly and moderately correlated with NDI-G (ρ = 0.70) and VAS (ρ = 0.41) scores, respectively. There were no floor or ceiling effects. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94. OMPSQ-G showed high reliability (intraclass correlation 2.1: 0.93; standard error of measurement, 6.9; smallest detectable change, 20 points). The Bland–Altman plot indicated no systematic error. OMPSQ-G showed good validity and reliability in patients with neck pain. Trial registration NCT02540343 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3269-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5833147/ /pubmed/29499753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3269-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Note
Langenfeld, Anke
Bastiaenen, Carolien
Brunner, Florian
Swanenburg, Jaap
Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain
title Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain
title_full Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain
title_fullStr Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain
title_short Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain
title_sort validation of the orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29499753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3269-x
work_keys_str_mv AT langenfeldanke validationoftheorebromusculoskeletalpainscreeningquestionnaireinpatientswithchronicneckpain
AT bastiaenencarolien validationoftheorebromusculoskeletalpainscreeningquestionnaireinpatientswithchronicneckpain
AT brunnerflorian validationoftheorebromusculoskeletalpainscreeningquestionnaireinpatientswithchronicneckpain
AT swanenburgjaap validationoftheorebromusculoskeletalpainscreeningquestionnaireinpatientswithchronicneckpain