Cargando…

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

The number of published systematic reviews of studies of healthcare interventions has increased rapidly and these are used extensively for clinical and policy decisions. Systematic reviews are subject to a range of biases and increasingly include non-randomised studies of interventions. It is import...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Shea, Beverley J, Reeves, Barnaby C, Wells, George, Thuku, Micere, Hamel, Candyce, Moran, Julian, Moher, David, Tugwell, Peter, Welch, Vivian, Kristjansson, Elizabeth, Henry, David A
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2017
Materias:	Research Methods & Reporting
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28935701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008

Ejemplares similares

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Antenatal and postpartum prevention of Rh alloimmunization: A systematic review and GRADE analysis
por: Hamel, Candyce, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Screening for esophageal adenocarcinoma and precancerous conditions (dysplasia and Barrett’s esophagus) in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease with or without other risk factors: two systematic reviews and one overview of reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC)
por: Hamel, Candyce, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Screening for depression among the general adult population and in women during pregnancy or the first-year postpartum: two systematic reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
por: Beck, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines
por: Kelly, Shannon E, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor
por: Faggion, Clovis Mariano
Publicado: (2015)

Care plans for women pregnant using assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review
por: Velez, Maria P., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Shea, Beverley J., et al.
Publicado: (2007)

User experience of applying AMSTAR 2 to appraise systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a commentary
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools
por: Pereira, Alexandre-Godinho, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Taking an integrated knowledge translation approach in research to develop the CONSORT-Equity 2017 reporting guideline: an observational study
por: Jull, Janet, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
por: Dosenovic, Svjetlana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Systematic reviews need to consider applicability to disadvantaged populations: inter-rater agreement for a health equity plausibility algorithm
por: Welch, Vivian, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study
por: Gates, Allison, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis Studies in Dance Therapy Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2
por: Kim, Hye-Ryeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption
por: Bojcic, Ruzica, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

AMSTAR 2 appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of heart failure from high-impact journals
por: Li, Lin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Realist review of community coalitions and outreach interventions to increase access to primary care for vulnerable populations: a realist review
por: Welch, Vivian, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Different Approaches to Appraising Systematic Reviews of Digital Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion Using AMSTAR 2 Tool: Cross-Sectional Study
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review
por: Wilson, Blair, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Household cost-benefit equations and sustainable universal childhood immunisation: a randomised cluster controlled trial in south Pakistan [ISRCTN12421731]
por: Andersson, Neil, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration
por: Welch, Vivian, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Reporting of health equity considerations in cluster and individually randomized trials
por: Petkovic, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
por: Shea, Beverley, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Considerations and guidance in designing equity-relevant clinical trials
por: Mbuagbaw, Lawrence, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?
por: Wegewitz, Uta, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Applicability and generalisability of published results of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies evaluating four orthopaedic procedures: methodological systematic review
por: Pibouleau, Leslie, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity
por: Welch, Vivian, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Engaging knowledge users in development of the CONSORT-Equity 2017 reporting guideline: a qualitative study using in-depth interviews
por: Jull, Janet, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews
por: Kang, Deying, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

When is a randomised controlled trial health equity relevant? Development and validation of a conceptual framework
por: Jull, J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

An overview of systematic reviews of complementary and alternative therapies for fibromyalgia using both AMSTAR and ROBIS as quality assessment tools
por: Perry, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement
por: Burda, Brittany U., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Editorial Perspective: Time for Another Grading System—From PRISMA to AMSTAR 2
por: Chapman, Jens R.
Publicado: (2020)

Testing the PRISMA-Equity 2012 Reporting Guideline: the Perspectives of Systematic Review Authors
por: Burford, Belinda J., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_egl60s7kl29uscardte50mtmbe