Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Extracranial Vein Angioplasty in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) is characterized by restricted venous outflow from the brain and spinal cord. Whether this condition is associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) and whether venous percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is beneficial in persons with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zamboni, Paolo, Tesio, Luigi, Galimberti, Stefania, Massacesi, Luca, Salvi, Fabrizio, D’Alessandro, Roberto, Cenni, Patrizia, Galeotti, Roberto, Papini, Donato, D’Amico, Roberto, Simi, Silvana, Valsecchi, Maria Grazia, Filippini, Graziella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29150995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3825
_version_ 1783303499714396160
author Zamboni, Paolo
Tesio, Luigi
Galimberti, Stefania
Massacesi, Luca
Salvi, Fabrizio
D’Alessandro, Roberto
Cenni, Patrizia
Galeotti, Roberto
Papini, Donato
D’Amico, Roberto
Simi, Silvana
Valsecchi, Maria Grazia
Filippini, Graziella
author_facet Zamboni, Paolo
Tesio, Luigi
Galimberti, Stefania
Massacesi, Luca
Salvi, Fabrizio
D’Alessandro, Roberto
Cenni, Patrizia
Galeotti, Roberto
Papini, Donato
D’Amico, Roberto
Simi, Silvana
Valsecchi, Maria Grazia
Filippini, Graziella
author_sort Zamboni, Paolo
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) is characterized by restricted venous outflow from the brain and spinal cord. Whether this condition is associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) and whether venous percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is beneficial in persons with MS and CCSVI is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of venous PTA in patients with MS and CCSVI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 177 patients with relapsing-remitting MS; 62 were ineligible, including 47 (26.6%) who did not have CCSVI on color Doppler ultrasonography screening. A total of 115 patients were recruited in the study timeframe. All patients underwent a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group trial in 6 MS centers in Italy. The trial began in August 2012 and concluded in March 2016; data were analyzed from April 2016 to September 2016. The analysis was intention to treat. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated (2:1) to either venous PTA or catheter venography without venous angioplasty (sham). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Two primary end points were assessed at 12 months: (1) a composite functional measure (ie, walking control, balance, manual dexterity, postvoid residual urine volume, and visual acuity) and (2) a measure of new combined brain lesions on magnetic resonance imaging, including the proportion of lesion-free patients. Combined lesions included T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions plus new or enlarged T2 lesions. RESULTS: Of the included 115 patients with relapsing-remitting MS, 76 were allocated to the PTA group (45 female [59%]; mean [SD] age, 40.0 [10.3] years) and 39 to the sham group (29 female [74%]; mean [SD] age, 37.5 [10.6] years); 112 (97.4%) completed follow-up. No serious adverse events occurred. Flow restoration was achieved in 38 of 71 patients (54%) in the PTA group. The functional composite measure did not differ between the PTA and sham groups (41.7% vs 48.7%; odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.34-1.68; P = .49). The mean (SD) number of combined lesions on magnetic resonance imaging at 6 to 12 months were 0.47 (1.19) in the PTA group vs 1.27 (2.65) in the sham group (mean ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.91; P = .03: adjusted P = .09) and were 1.40 (4.21) in the PTA group vs 1.95 (3.73) in the sham group at 0 to 12 months (mean ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.32-1.63; P = .45; adjusted P = .45). At follow-up after 6 to 12 months, 58 of 70 patients (83%) in the PTA group and 22 of 33 (67%) in the sham group were free of new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (odds ratio, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.11-6.28; P = .03; adjusted P = .09). At 0 to 12 months, 46 of 73 patients (63.0%) in the PTA group and 18 of 37 (49%) in the sham group were free of new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (odds ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.81-4.01; P = .15; adjusted P = .30). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Venous PTA has proven to be a safe but largely ineffective technique; the treatment cannot be recommended in patients with MS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01371760
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5833494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58334942018-03-29 Efficacy and Safety of Extracranial Vein Angioplasty in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial Zamboni, Paolo Tesio, Luigi Galimberti, Stefania Massacesi, Luca Salvi, Fabrizio D’Alessandro, Roberto Cenni, Patrizia Galeotti, Roberto Papini, Donato D’Amico, Roberto Simi, Silvana Valsecchi, Maria Grazia Filippini, Graziella JAMA Neurol Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) is characterized by restricted venous outflow from the brain and spinal cord. Whether this condition is associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) and whether venous percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is beneficial in persons with MS and CCSVI is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of venous PTA in patients with MS and CCSVI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 177 patients with relapsing-remitting MS; 62 were ineligible, including 47 (26.6%) who did not have CCSVI on color Doppler ultrasonography screening. A total of 115 patients were recruited in the study timeframe. All patients underwent a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group trial in 6 MS centers in Italy. The trial began in August 2012 and concluded in March 2016; data were analyzed from April 2016 to September 2016. The analysis was intention to treat. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated (2:1) to either venous PTA or catheter venography without venous angioplasty (sham). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Two primary end points were assessed at 12 months: (1) a composite functional measure (ie, walking control, balance, manual dexterity, postvoid residual urine volume, and visual acuity) and (2) a measure of new combined brain lesions on magnetic resonance imaging, including the proportion of lesion-free patients. Combined lesions included T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions plus new or enlarged T2 lesions. RESULTS: Of the included 115 patients with relapsing-remitting MS, 76 were allocated to the PTA group (45 female [59%]; mean [SD] age, 40.0 [10.3] years) and 39 to the sham group (29 female [74%]; mean [SD] age, 37.5 [10.6] years); 112 (97.4%) completed follow-up. No serious adverse events occurred. Flow restoration was achieved in 38 of 71 patients (54%) in the PTA group. The functional composite measure did not differ between the PTA and sham groups (41.7% vs 48.7%; odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.34-1.68; P = .49). The mean (SD) number of combined lesions on magnetic resonance imaging at 6 to 12 months were 0.47 (1.19) in the PTA group vs 1.27 (2.65) in the sham group (mean ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.91; P = .03: adjusted P = .09) and were 1.40 (4.21) in the PTA group vs 1.95 (3.73) in the sham group at 0 to 12 months (mean ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.32-1.63; P = .45; adjusted P = .45). At follow-up after 6 to 12 months, 58 of 70 patients (83%) in the PTA group and 22 of 33 (67%) in the sham group were free of new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (odds ratio, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.11-6.28; P = .03; adjusted P = .09). At 0 to 12 months, 46 of 73 patients (63.0%) in the PTA group and 18 of 37 (49%) in the sham group were free of new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (odds ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.81-4.01; P = .15; adjusted P = .30). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Venous PTA has proven to be a safe but largely ineffective technique; the treatment cannot be recommended in patients with MS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01371760 American Medical Association 2017-11-18 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5833494/ /pubmed/29150995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3825 Text en Copyright 2017 Zamboni P et al. JAMA Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Zamboni, Paolo
Tesio, Luigi
Galimberti, Stefania
Massacesi, Luca
Salvi, Fabrizio
D’Alessandro, Roberto
Cenni, Patrizia
Galeotti, Roberto
Papini, Donato
D’Amico, Roberto
Simi, Silvana
Valsecchi, Maria Grazia
Filippini, Graziella
Efficacy and Safety of Extracranial Vein Angioplasty in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Efficacy and Safety of Extracranial Vein Angioplasty in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Extracranial Vein Angioplasty in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Extracranial Vein Angioplasty in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Extracranial Vein Angioplasty in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Extracranial Vein Angioplasty in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of extracranial vein angioplasty in multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29150995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3825
work_keys_str_mv AT zambonipaolo efficacyandsafetyofextracranialveinangioplastyinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT tesioluigi efficacyandsafetyofextracranialveinangioplastyinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT galimbertistefania efficacyandsafetyofextracranialveinangioplastyinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT massacesiluca efficacyandsafetyofextracranialveinangioplastyinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT salvifabrizio efficacyandsafetyofextracranialveinangioplastyinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dalessandroroberto efficacyandsafetyofextracranialveinangioplastyinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT cennipatrizia efficacyandsafetyofextracranialveinangioplastyinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT galeottiroberto efficacyandsafetyofextracranialveinangioplastyinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT papinidonato efficacyandsafetyofextracranialveinangioplastyinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT damicoroberto efficacyandsafetyofextracranialveinangioplastyinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT simisilvana efficacyandsafetyofextracranialveinangioplastyinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT valsecchimariagrazia efficacyandsafetyofextracranialveinangioplastyinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT filippinigraziella efficacyandsafetyofextracranialveinangioplastyinmultiplesclerosisarandomizedclinicaltrial