Cargando…
Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The dismal prognosis of gastric cancer patients is a global problem. We aim to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of proximal and distal gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gastric cancer cases diagnosed and treated at the same surgical unit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29520154 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S157378 |
_version_ | 1783303528673968128 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Xuefeng Hu, Fulan Li, Chunfeng Yao, Qiang Zhang, Hongfeng Xue, Yingwei |
author_facet | Yu, Xuefeng Hu, Fulan Li, Chunfeng Yao, Qiang Zhang, Hongfeng Xue, Yingwei |
author_sort | Yu, Xuefeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The dismal prognosis of gastric cancer patients is a global problem. We aim to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of proximal and distal gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gastric cancer cases diagnosed and treated at the same surgical unit between 2007 and 2010 were reviewed. Follow-up data from all patients were collected for at least 5 years until 2015. A total of 964 patients were studied (distal gastric cancer [DG], n=777 and proximal gastric cancer [PG], n=187). RESULTS: DG patients had a relatively higher percentage of females, more thorough therapy (R0 [D0/D1/D2]), fewer combined organ resections, younger age, smaller tumors (<5 cm), shorter surgery durations, less blood loss during surgery, and a relatively lower percentage of nodal metastases and a TNM stage of 4 (p<0.05). A significantly higher 5-year survival rate was observed in DG patients compared to PG patients (DG: 51%, PG: 28%; p<0.001). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, blood loss during surgery, surgery approach of lymph node dissection, treatment with palliative surgery, histopathologic type, TNM stage, and tumor location were independent predictors of poor outcome. CONCLUSION: The different characteristics and prognosis of DG and PG cases have implications for the development of guiding strategies for a surgical program and assessment of prognosis of gastric cancer patients based on tumor location. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5833755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58337552018-03-08 Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer Yu, Xuefeng Hu, Fulan Li, Chunfeng Yao, Qiang Zhang, Hongfeng Xue, Yingwei Onco Targets Ther Original Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The dismal prognosis of gastric cancer patients is a global problem. We aim to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of proximal and distal gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gastric cancer cases diagnosed and treated at the same surgical unit between 2007 and 2010 were reviewed. Follow-up data from all patients were collected for at least 5 years until 2015. A total of 964 patients were studied (distal gastric cancer [DG], n=777 and proximal gastric cancer [PG], n=187). RESULTS: DG patients had a relatively higher percentage of females, more thorough therapy (R0 [D0/D1/D2]), fewer combined organ resections, younger age, smaller tumors (<5 cm), shorter surgery durations, less blood loss during surgery, and a relatively lower percentage of nodal metastases and a TNM stage of 4 (p<0.05). A significantly higher 5-year survival rate was observed in DG patients compared to PG patients (DG: 51%, PG: 28%; p<0.001). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, blood loss during surgery, surgery approach of lymph node dissection, treatment with palliative surgery, histopathologic type, TNM stage, and tumor location were independent predictors of poor outcome. CONCLUSION: The different characteristics and prognosis of DG and PG cases have implications for the development of guiding strategies for a surgical program and assessment of prognosis of gastric cancer patients based on tumor location. Dove Medical Press 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5833755/ /pubmed/29520154 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S157378 Text en © 2018 Yu et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yu, Xuefeng Hu, Fulan Li, Chunfeng Yao, Qiang Zhang, Hongfeng Xue, Yingwei Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer |
title | Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer |
title_full | Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer |
title_fullStr | Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer |
title_short | Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer |
title_sort | clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29520154 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S157378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuxuefeng clinicopathologiccharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancer AT hufulan clinicopathologiccharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancer AT lichunfeng clinicopathologiccharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancer AT yaoqiang clinicopathologiccharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancer AT zhanghongfeng clinicopathologiccharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancer AT xueyingwei clinicopathologiccharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancer |