Cargando…

Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The dismal prognosis of gastric cancer patients is a global problem. We aim to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of proximal and distal gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gastric cancer cases diagnosed and treated at the same surgical unit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Xuefeng, Hu, Fulan, Li, Chunfeng, Yao, Qiang, Zhang, Hongfeng, Xue, Yingwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29520154
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S157378
_version_ 1783303528673968128
author Yu, Xuefeng
Hu, Fulan
Li, Chunfeng
Yao, Qiang
Zhang, Hongfeng
Xue, Yingwei
author_facet Yu, Xuefeng
Hu, Fulan
Li, Chunfeng
Yao, Qiang
Zhang, Hongfeng
Xue, Yingwei
author_sort Yu, Xuefeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The dismal prognosis of gastric cancer patients is a global problem. We aim to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of proximal and distal gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gastric cancer cases diagnosed and treated at the same surgical unit between 2007 and 2010 were reviewed. Follow-up data from all patients were collected for at least 5 years until 2015. A total of 964 patients were studied (distal gastric cancer [DG], n=777 and proximal gastric cancer [PG], n=187). RESULTS: DG patients had a relatively higher percentage of females, more thorough therapy (R0 [D0/D1/D2]), fewer combined organ resections, younger age, smaller tumors (<5 cm), shorter surgery durations, less blood loss during surgery, and a relatively lower percentage of nodal metastases and a TNM stage of 4 (p<0.05). A significantly higher 5-year survival rate was observed in DG patients compared to PG patients (DG: 51%, PG: 28%; p<0.001). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, blood loss during surgery, surgery approach of lymph node dissection, treatment with palliative surgery, histopathologic type, TNM stage, and tumor location were independent predictors of poor outcome. CONCLUSION: The different characteristics and prognosis of DG and PG cases have implications for the development of guiding strategies for a surgical program and assessment of prognosis of gastric cancer patients based on tumor location.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5833755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58337552018-03-08 Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer Yu, Xuefeng Hu, Fulan Li, Chunfeng Yao, Qiang Zhang, Hongfeng Xue, Yingwei Onco Targets Ther Original Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The dismal prognosis of gastric cancer patients is a global problem. We aim to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of proximal and distal gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gastric cancer cases diagnosed and treated at the same surgical unit between 2007 and 2010 were reviewed. Follow-up data from all patients were collected for at least 5 years until 2015. A total of 964 patients were studied (distal gastric cancer [DG], n=777 and proximal gastric cancer [PG], n=187). RESULTS: DG patients had a relatively higher percentage of females, more thorough therapy (R0 [D0/D1/D2]), fewer combined organ resections, younger age, smaller tumors (<5 cm), shorter surgery durations, less blood loss during surgery, and a relatively lower percentage of nodal metastases and a TNM stage of 4 (p<0.05). A significantly higher 5-year survival rate was observed in DG patients compared to PG patients (DG: 51%, PG: 28%; p<0.001). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size, blood loss during surgery, surgery approach of lymph node dissection, treatment with palliative surgery, histopathologic type, TNM stage, and tumor location were independent predictors of poor outcome. CONCLUSION: The different characteristics and prognosis of DG and PG cases have implications for the development of guiding strategies for a surgical program and assessment of prognosis of gastric cancer patients based on tumor location. Dove Medical Press 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5833755/ /pubmed/29520154 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S157378 Text en © 2018 Yu et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yu, Xuefeng
Hu, Fulan
Li, Chunfeng
Yao, Qiang
Zhang, Hongfeng
Xue, Yingwei
Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer
title Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer
title_full Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer
title_fullStr Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer
title_short Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer
title_sort clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29520154
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S157378
work_keys_str_mv AT yuxuefeng clinicopathologiccharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancer
AT hufulan clinicopathologiccharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancer
AT lichunfeng clinicopathologiccharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancer
AT yaoqiang clinicopathologiccharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancer
AT zhanghongfeng clinicopathologiccharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancer
AT xueyingwei clinicopathologiccharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancer