Cargando…
Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Describe the survival rates and distribution of events on competing failure types in vulvar carcinoma after treatment with chemoradiation (CRT) or radiation (RT) alone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included patients with vulvar carcinoma treated with CRT or RT between 2009 and 20...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29594213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2017.06.002 |
_version_ | 1783303562302849024 |
---|---|
author | Vorbeck, Christina Steen Vogelius, Ivan Richter Banner-Voigt, Marie Louise Vorndran Cøln Mathiesen, Hanne From Mirza, Mansoor Raza |
author_facet | Vorbeck, Christina Steen Vogelius, Ivan Richter Banner-Voigt, Marie Louise Vorndran Cøln Mathiesen, Hanne From Mirza, Mansoor Raza |
author_sort | Vorbeck, Christina Steen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Describe the survival rates and distribution of events on competing failure types in vulvar carcinoma after treatment with chemoradiation (CRT) or radiation (RT) alone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included patients with vulvar carcinoma treated with CRT or RT between 2009 and 2014. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed a competing risk analysis and included five competing events: loco-regional failure (LRF), distant metastasis, LRF plus distant metastasis, and death without evidence of disease, with the remaining patients denoted alive without evidence of disease. RESULTS: 87 patients were treated. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 3 years were 40% and 57%, respectively. 41.3% of patients relapsed, most often loco-regionally. We saw significantly worse PFS and OS for patients older than 68 (p = 0.011/p = 0.010) and for patients treated with definitive RT (p = 0.004/p = 0.005). Competing risk analysis showed increased risk of LRF, and that death was most often related to vulvar cancer. Death without disease recurrence was less frequent, even in the elderly. CONCLUSIONS: LRF was the most common event. PFS and OS were inferior for elderly patients and patients treated definitively. A better understanding of these differences may be used to define risk adapted treatment strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5833899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58338992018-03-28 Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer Vorbeck, Christina Steen Vogelius, Ivan Richter Banner-Voigt, Marie Louise Vorndran Cøln Mathiesen, Hanne From Mirza, Mansoor Raza Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Describe the survival rates and distribution of events on competing failure types in vulvar carcinoma after treatment with chemoradiation (CRT) or radiation (RT) alone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included patients with vulvar carcinoma treated with CRT or RT between 2009 and 2014. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed a competing risk analysis and included five competing events: loco-regional failure (LRF), distant metastasis, LRF plus distant metastasis, and death without evidence of disease, with the remaining patients denoted alive without evidence of disease. RESULTS: 87 patients were treated. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 3 years were 40% and 57%, respectively. 41.3% of patients relapsed, most often loco-regionally. We saw significantly worse PFS and OS for patients older than 68 (p = 0.011/p = 0.010) and for patients treated with definitive RT (p = 0.004/p = 0.005). Competing risk analysis showed increased risk of LRF, and that death was most often related to vulvar cancer. Death without disease recurrence was less frequent, even in the elderly. CONCLUSIONS: LRF was the most common event. PFS and OS were inferior for elderly patients and patients treated definitively. A better understanding of these differences may be used to define risk adapted treatment strategies. Elsevier 2017-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5833899/ /pubmed/29594213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2017.06.002 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Vorbeck, Christina Steen Vogelius, Ivan Richter Banner-Voigt, Marie Louise Vorndran Cøln Mathiesen, Hanne From Mirza, Mansoor Raza Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer |
title | Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer |
title_full | Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer |
title_fullStr | Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer |
title_short | Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer |
title_sort | survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29594213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2017.06.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vorbeckchristinasteen survivalandfailuretypesafterradiationtherapyofvulvarcancer AT vogeliusivanrichter survivalandfailuretypesafterradiationtherapyofvulvarcancer AT bannervoigtmarielouisevorndrancøln survivalandfailuretypesafterradiationtherapyofvulvarcancer AT mathiesenhannefrom survivalandfailuretypesafterradiationtherapyofvulvarcancer AT mirzamansoorraza survivalandfailuretypesafterradiationtherapyofvulvarcancer |