Cargando…
A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
BACKGROUND: Eribulin is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor with a novel mechanism of action. This phase 3 study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with heavily pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice (TPC). PATIENTS AND METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28911085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx284 |
_version_ | 1783303585590673408 |
---|---|
author | Katakami, N. Felip, E. Spigel, D. R. Kim, J.-H. Olivo, M. Guo, M. Nokihara, H. Yang, J. C.-H. Iannotti, N. Satouchi, M. Barlesi, F. |
author_facet | Katakami, N. Felip, E. Spigel, D. R. Kim, J.-H. Olivo, M. Guo, M. Nokihara, H. Yang, J. C.-H. Iannotti, N. Satouchi, M. Barlesi, F. |
author_sort | Katakami, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Eribulin is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor with a novel mechanism of action. This phase 3 study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with heavily pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice (TPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC who had received ≥2 prior therapies, including platinum-based doublet and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, were randomly assigned to receive eribulin or TPC (gemcitabine, pemetrexed, vinorelbine, docetaxel). The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and objective response rate. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty patients were randomized to either eribulin (n = 270) or TPC (n = 270). Median OS for eribulin and TPC was the same: 9.5 months [hazard ratio (HR): 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.95–1.41; P = 0.13]. Progression-free survival for eribulin and TPC was 3.0 and 2.8 months, respectively (HR: 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.90–1.32; P = 0.39). The objective response rate was 12% for eribulin and 15% for TPC. Clinical benefit rate (eribulin, 57%; TPC, 55%) and disease control rate (eribulin, 63%; TPC, 58%) were similar between treatment arms. The most common adverse event was neutropenia, which occurred in 57% of eribulin patients and 49% of TPC patients at all grades. Other non-hematologic side-effects were manageable and similar in both groups except for peripheral sensory neuropathy (all grades; eribulin, 16%; TPC, 9%). CONCLUSION: This phase 3 study did not demonstrate superiority of eribulin over TPC with regard to overall survival. However, eribulin does show activity in the third-line setting for NSCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: www.ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01454934. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5834051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58340512018-03-12 A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer Katakami, N. Felip, E. Spigel, D. R. Kim, J.-H. Olivo, M. Guo, M. Nokihara, H. Yang, J. C.-H. Iannotti, N. Satouchi, M. Barlesi, F. Ann Oncol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Eribulin is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor with a novel mechanism of action. This phase 3 study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with heavily pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice (TPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC who had received ≥2 prior therapies, including platinum-based doublet and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, were randomly assigned to receive eribulin or TPC (gemcitabine, pemetrexed, vinorelbine, docetaxel). The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and objective response rate. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty patients were randomized to either eribulin (n = 270) or TPC (n = 270). Median OS for eribulin and TPC was the same: 9.5 months [hazard ratio (HR): 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.95–1.41; P = 0.13]. Progression-free survival for eribulin and TPC was 3.0 and 2.8 months, respectively (HR: 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.90–1.32; P = 0.39). The objective response rate was 12% for eribulin and 15% for TPC. Clinical benefit rate (eribulin, 57%; TPC, 55%) and disease control rate (eribulin, 63%; TPC, 58%) were similar between treatment arms. The most common adverse event was neutropenia, which occurred in 57% of eribulin patients and 49% of TPC patients at all grades. Other non-hematologic side-effects were manageable and similar in both groups except for peripheral sensory neuropathy (all grades; eribulin, 16%; TPC, 9%). CONCLUSION: This phase 3 study did not demonstrate superiority of eribulin over TPC with regard to overall survival. However, eribulin does show activity in the third-line setting for NSCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: www.ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01454934. Oxford University Press 2017-09 2017-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5834051/ /pubmed/28911085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx284 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Katakami, N. Felip, E. Spigel, D. R. Kim, J.-H. Olivo, M. Guo, M. Nokihara, H. Yang, J. C.-H. Iannotti, N. Satouchi, M. Barlesi, F. A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
title | A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
title_full | A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
title_fullStr | A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
title_short | A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
title_sort | randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28911085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katakamin arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT felipe arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT spigeldr arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT kimjh arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT olivom arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT guom arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT nokiharah arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT yangjch arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT iannottin arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT satouchim arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT barlesif arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT katakamin randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT felipe randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT spigeldr randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT kimjh randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT olivom randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT guom randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT nokiharah randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT yangjch randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT iannottin randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT satouchim randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer AT barlesif randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer |