Cargando…

A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Eribulin is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor with a novel mechanism of action. This phase 3 study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with heavily pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice (TPC). PATIENTS AND METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katakami, N., Felip, E., Spigel, D. R., Kim, J.-H., Olivo, M., Guo, M., Nokihara, H., Yang, J. C.-H., Iannotti, N., Satouchi, M., Barlesi, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28911085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx284
_version_ 1783303585590673408
author Katakami, N.
Felip, E.
Spigel, D. R.
Kim, J.-H.
Olivo, M.
Guo, M.
Nokihara, H.
Yang, J. C.-H.
Iannotti, N.
Satouchi, M.
Barlesi, F.
author_facet Katakami, N.
Felip, E.
Spigel, D. R.
Kim, J.-H.
Olivo, M.
Guo, M.
Nokihara, H.
Yang, J. C.-H.
Iannotti, N.
Satouchi, M.
Barlesi, F.
author_sort Katakami, N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Eribulin is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor with a novel mechanism of action. This phase 3 study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with heavily pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice (TPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC who had received ≥2 prior therapies, including platinum-based doublet and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, were randomly assigned to receive eribulin or TPC (gemcitabine, pemetrexed, vinorelbine, docetaxel). The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and objective response rate. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty patients were randomized to either eribulin (n = 270) or TPC (n = 270). Median OS for eribulin and TPC was the same: 9.5 months [hazard ratio (HR): 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.95–1.41; P = 0.13]. Progression-free survival for eribulin and TPC was 3.0 and 2.8 months, respectively (HR: 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.90–1.32; P = 0.39). The objective response rate was 12% for eribulin and 15% for TPC. Clinical benefit rate (eribulin, 57%; TPC, 55%) and disease control rate (eribulin, 63%; TPC, 58%) were similar between treatment arms. The most common adverse event was neutropenia, which occurred in 57% of eribulin patients and 49% of TPC patients at all grades. Other non-hematologic side-effects were manageable and similar in both groups except for peripheral sensory neuropathy (all grades; eribulin, 16%; TPC, 9%). CONCLUSION: This phase 3 study did not demonstrate superiority of eribulin over TPC with regard to overall survival. However, eribulin does show activity in the third-line setting for NSCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: www.ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01454934.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5834051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58340512018-03-12 A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer Katakami, N. Felip, E. Spigel, D. R. Kim, J.-H. Olivo, M. Guo, M. Nokihara, H. Yang, J. C.-H. Iannotti, N. Satouchi, M. Barlesi, F. Ann Oncol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Eribulin is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor with a novel mechanism of action. This phase 3 study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with heavily pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice (TPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC who had received ≥2 prior therapies, including platinum-based doublet and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, were randomly assigned to receive eribulin or TPC (gemcitabine, pemetrexed, vinorelbine, docetaxel). The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and objective response rate. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty patients were randomized to either eribulin (n = 270) or TPC (n = 270). Median OS for eribulin and TPC was the same: 9.5 months [hazard ratio (HR): 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.95–1.41; P = 0.13]. Progression-free survival for eribulin and TPC was 3.0 and 2.8 months, respectively (HR: 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.90–1.32; P = 0.39). The objective response rate was 12% for eribulin and 15% for TPC. Clinical benefit rate (eribulin, 57%; TPC, 55%) and disease control rate (eribulin, 63%; TPC, 58%) were similar between treatment arms. The most common adverse event was neutropenia, which occurred in 57% of eribulin patients and 49% of TPC patients at all grades. Other non-hematologic side-effects were manageable and similar in both groups except for peripheral sensory neuropathy (all grades; eribulin, 16%; TPC, 9%). CONCLUSION: This phase 3 study did not demonstrate superiority of eribulin over TPC with regard to overall survival. However, eribulin does show activity in the third-line setting for NSCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: www.ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01454934. Oxford University Press 2017-09 2017-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5834051/ /pubmed/28911085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx284 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Katakami, N.
Felip, E.
Spigel, D. R.
Kim, J.-H.
Olivo, M.
Guo, M.
Nokihara, H.
Yang, J. C.-H.
Iannotti, N.
Satouchi, M.
Barlesi, F.
A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
title A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
title_full A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
title_short A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
title_sort randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28911085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx284
work_keys_str_mv AT katakamin arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT felipe arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT spigeldr arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kimjh arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT olivom arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT guom arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nokiharah arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yangjch arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT iannottin arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT satouchim arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT barlesif arandomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT katakamin randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT felipe randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT spigeldr randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT kimjh randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT olivom randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT guom randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT nokiharah randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yangjch randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT iannottin randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT satouchim randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT barlesif randomizedopenlabelmulticenterphase3studytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyoferibulintotreatmentofphysicianschoiceinpatientswithadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer