Cargando…

Rationale and design of the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study: a prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial

AIMS: There is lack of conclusive evidence from randomized clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with implanted pacemakers (PM) or defibrillators (ICD) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and chronic heart fail...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merkely, Bela, Kosztin, Annamaria, Roka, Attila, Geller, Laszlo, Zima, Endre, Kovacs, Attila, Boros, Andras Mihaly, Klein, Helmut, Wranicz, Jerzy K., Hindricks, Gerhard, Clemens, Marcell, Duray, Gabor Z., Moss, Arthur J., Goldenberg, Ilan, Kutyifa, Valentina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28339581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw193
_version_ 1783303587277832192
author Merkely, Bela
Kosztin, Annamaria
Roka, Attila
Geller, Laszlo
Zima, Endre
Kovacs, Attila
Boros, Andras Mihaly
Klein, Helmut
Wranicz, Jerzy K.
Hindricks, Gerhard
Clemens, Marcell
Duray, Gabor Z.
Moss, Arthur J.
Goldenberg, Ilan
Kutyifa, Valentina
author_facet Merkely, Bela
Kosztin, Annamaria
Roka, Attila
Geller, Laszlo
Zima, Endre
Kovacs, Attila
Boros, Andras Mihaly
Klein, Helmut
Wranicz, Jerzy K.
Hindricks, Gerhard
Clemens, Marcell
Duray, Gabor Z.
Moss, Arthur J.
Goldenberg, Ilan
Kutyifa, Valentina
author_sort Merkely, Bela
collection PubMed
description AIMS: There is lack of conclusive evidence from randomized clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with implanted pacemakers (PM) or defibrillators (ICD) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and chronic heart failure (HF). The BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of CRT upgrade from conventional PM or ICD therapy in patients with intermittent or permanent right ventricular (RV) septal/apical pacing, reduced LVEF, and symptomatic HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The BUDAPEST-CRT study is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, investigator-sponsored clinical trial. A total of 360 subjects will be enrolled with LVEF ≤ 35%, NYHA functional classes II–IVa, paced QRS ≥ 150 ms, and a RV pacing ≥ 20%. Patients will be followed for 12 months. Randomization is performed in a 3:2 ratio (CRT-D vs. ICD). The primary composite endpoint is all-cause mortality, a first HF event, or less than 15% reduction in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are all-cause mortality, all-cause mortality or HF event, and LV volume reduction at 12 months. Tertiary endpoints include changes in quality of life, NYHA functional class, 6 min walk test, natriuretic peptides, and safety outcomes. CONCLUSION: The results of our prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial will provide important information on the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) upgrade in patients with symptomatic HF, reduced LVEF, and wide-paced QRS with intermittent or permanent RV pacing. CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02270840.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5834067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58340672018-03-07 Rationale and design of the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study: a prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial Merkely, Bela Kosztin, Annamaria Roka, Attila Geller, Laszlo Zima, Endre Kovacs, Attila Boros, Andras Mihaly Klein, Helmut Wranicz, Jerzy K. Hindricks, Gerhard Clemens, Marcell Duray, Gabor Z. Moss, Arthur J. Goldenberg, Ilan Kutyifa, Valentina Europace Clinical Research AIMS: There is lack of conclusive evidence from randomized clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with implanted pacemakers (PM) or defibrillators (ICD) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and chronic heart failure (HF). The BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of CRT upgrade from conventional PM or ICD therapy in patients with intermittent or permanent right ventricular (RV) septal/apical pacing, reduced LVEF, and symptomatic HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The BUDAPEST-CRT study is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, investigator-sponsored clinical trial. A total of 360 subjects will be enrolled with LVEF ≤ 35%, NYHA functional classes II–IVa, paced QRS ≥ 150 ms, and a RV pacing ≥ 20%. Patients will be followed for 12 months. Randomization is performed in a 3:2 ratio (CRT-D vs. ICD). The primary composite endpoint is all-cause mortality, a first HF event, or less than 15% reduction in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are all-cause mortality, all-cause mortality or HF event, and LV volume reduction at 12 months. Tertiary endpoints include changes in quality of life, NYHA functional class, 6 min walk test, natriuretic peptides, and safety outcomes. CONCLUSION: The results of our prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial will provide important information on the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) upgrade in patients with symptomatic HF, reduced LVEF, and wide-paced QRS with intermittent or permanent RV pacing. CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02270840. Oxford University Press 2017-09 2016-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5834067/ /pubmed/28339581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw193 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Merkely, Bela
Kosztin, Annamaria
Roka, Attila
Geller, Laszlo
Zima, Endre
Kovacs, Attila
Boros, Andras Mihaly
Klein, Helmut
Wranicz, Jerzy K.
Hindricks, Gerhard
Clemens, Marcell
Duray, Gabor Z.
Moss, Arthur J.
Goldenberg, Ilan
Kutyifa, Valentina
Rationale and design of the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study: a prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial
title Rationale and design of the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study: a prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial
title_full Rationale and design of the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study: a prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial
title_fullStr Rationale and design of the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study: a prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and design of the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study: a prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial
title_short Rationale and design of the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study: a prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial
title_sort rationale and design of the budapest-crt upgrade study: a prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28339581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw193
work_keys_str_mv AT merkelybela rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT kosztinannamaria rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT rokaattila rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT gellerlaszlo rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT zimaendre rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT kovacsattila rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT borosandrasmihaly rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT kleinhelmut rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT wraniczjerzyk rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT hindricksgerhard rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT clemensmarcell rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT duraygaborz rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT mossarthurj rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT goldenbergilan rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT kutyifavalentina rationaleanddesignofthebudapestcrtupgradestudyaprospectiverandomizedmulticentreclinicaltrial