Cargando…

Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To examine whether age-related reference ranges for “normal” prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change (determined in men without prostate cancer) can be used to identify men at high risk of having prostate cancer. METHODS: Subjects were men aged 50–69 years with PSA < 10 ng/mL from the UK-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilbert, Rebecca, Tilling, Kate, Martin, Richard M., Lane, J. Athene, Davis, Michael, Hamdy, Freddie C., Neal, David E., Donovan, Jenny L., Metcalfe, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29453511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1014-3
_version_ 1783303674760527872
author Gilbert, Rebecca
Tilling, Kate
Martin, Richard M.
Lane, J. Athene
Davis, Michael
Hamdy, Freddie C.
Neal, David E.
Donovan, Jenny L.
Metcalfe, Chris
author_facet Gilbert, Rebecca
Tilling, Kate
Martin, Richard M.
Lane, J. Athene
Davis, Michael
Hamdy, Freddie C.
Neal, David E.
Donovan, Jenny L.
Metcalfe, Chris
author_sort Gilbert, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To examine whether age-related reference ranges for “normal” prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change (determined in men without prostate cancer) can be used to identify men at high risk of having prostate cancer. METHODS: Subjects were men aged 50–69 years with PSA < 10 ng/mL from the UK-based Prostate Testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study. Men with prostate cancer were categorized as high or low risk of progression (Low risk: Gleason score ≤ 6 and stage T1–T2a; High risk: Gleason score 7–10 or stage T2C). Men without prostate cancer were those with no histological confirmation of prostate cancer. Previously developed longitudinal reference ranges for normal age-related PSA change were used to calculate an age-specific PSA threshold. We compared the ability of our age-specific PSA threshold to discriminate between high- and no/low-risk prostate cancer with that of two existing thresholds: (i) threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages; (ii) National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines dependent on age-group thresholds (age 50–59: PSA = 3 ng/mL; age 60–70: PSA = 4 ng/mL; age ≥ 70: PSA = 5 ng/mL). RESULTS: We included 823 men with high-risk prostate cancer and 80,721 men with no/low-risk prostate cancer. A threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages identified more high-risk prostate cancers, recommending biopsy in 9.8% of men, of which 10.3% (n = 823) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the NICE guidelines as the threshold for biopsy, 6.9% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 11.9% (n = 668) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the new age-specific threshold for biopsy, 2.3% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 15.2% (n = 290) had high-risk prostate cancer. The age-specific threshold identified fewer high-risk prostate cancers, but fewer men received unnecessary biopsy. CONCLUSION: There is no benefit to using reference ranges for “normal” PSA that change with age nor the age-specific thresholds suggested by the NICE guidelines. While the age-varying thresholds are more discriminatory, too many high-risk cancers are missed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10552-018-1014-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5834577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58345772018-03-09 Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer Gilbert, Rebecca Tilling, Kate Martin, Richard M. Lane, J. Athene Davis, Michael Hamdy, Freddie C. Neal, David E. Donovan, Jenny L. Metcalfe, Chris Cancer Causes Control Brief Report PURPOSE: To examine whether age-related reference ranges for “normal” prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change (determined in men without prostate cancer) can be used to identify men at high risk of having prostate cancer. METHODS: Subjects were men aged 50–69 years with PSA < 10 ng/mL from the UK-based Prostate Testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study. Men with prostate cancer were categorized as high or low risk of progression (Low risk: Gleason score ≤ 6 and stage T1–T2a; High risk: Gleason score 7–10 or stage T2C). Men without prostate cancer were those with no histological confirmation of prostate cancer. Previously developed longitudinal reference ranges for normal age-related PSA change were used to calculate an age-specific PSA threshold. We compared the ability of our age-specific PSA threshold to discriminate between high- and no/low-risk prostate cancer with that of two existing thresholds: (i) threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages; (ii) National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines dependent on age-group thresholds (age 50–59: PSA = 3 ng/mL; age 60–70: PSA = 4 ng/mL; age ≥ 70: PSA = 5 ng/mL). RESULTS: We included 823 men with high-risk prostate cancer and 80,721 men with no/low-risk prostate cancer. A threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages identified more high-risk prostate cancers, recommending biopsy in 9.8% of men, of which 10.3% (n = 823) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the NICE guidelines as the threshold for biopsy, 6.9% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 11.9% (n = 668) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the new age-specific threshold for biopsy, 2.3% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 15.2% (n = 290) had high-risk prostate cancer. The age-specific threshold identified fewer high-risk prostate cancers, but fewer men received unnecessary biopsy. CONCLUSION: There is no benefit to using reference ranges for “normal” PSA that change with age nor the age-specific thresholds suggested by the NICE guidelines. While the age-varying thresholds are more discriminatory, too many high-risk cancers are missed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10552-018-1014-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-02-16 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5834577/ /pubmed/29453511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1014-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Gilbert, Rebecca
Tilling, Kate
Martin, Richard M.
Lane, J. Athene
Davis, Michael
Hamdy, Freddie C.
Neal, David E.
Donovan, Jenny L.
Metcalfe, Chris
Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer
title Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer
title_full Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer
title_fullStr Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer
title_short Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer
title_sort developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29453511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1014-3
work_keys_str_mv AT gilbertrebecca developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer
AT tillingkate developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer
AT martinrichardm developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer
AT lanejathene developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer
AT davismichael developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer
AT hamdyfreddiec developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer
AT nealdavide developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer
AT donovanjennyl developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer
AT metcalfechris developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer