Cargando…
Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer
PURPOSE: To examine whether age-related reference ranges for “normal” prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change (determined in men without prostate cancer) can be used to identify men at high risk of having prostate cancer. METHODS: Subjects were men aged 50–69 years with PSA < 10 ng/mL from the UK-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29453511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1014-3 |
_version_ | 1783303674760527872 |
---|---|
author | Gilbert, Rebecca Tilling, Kate Martin, Richard M. Lane, J. Athene Davis, Michael Hamdy, Freddie C. Neal, David E. Donovan, Jenny L. Metcalfe, Chris |
author_facet | Gilbert, Rebecca Tilling, Kate Martin, Richard M. Lane, J. Athene Davis, Michael Hamdy, Freddie C. Neal, David E. Donovan, Jenny L. Metcalfe, Chris |
author_sort | Gilbert, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To examine whether age-related reference ranges for “normal” prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change (determined in men without prostate cancer) can be used to identify men at high risk of having prostate cancer. METHODS: Subjects were men aged 50–69 years with PSA < 10 ng/mL from the UK-based Prostate Testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study. Men with prostate cancer were categorized as high or low risk of progression (Low risk: Gleason score ≤ 6 and stage T1–T2a; High risk: Gleason score 7–10 or stage T2C). Men without prostate cancer were those with no histological confirmation of prostate cancer. Previously developed longitudinal reference ranges for normal age-related PSA change were used to calculate an age-specific PSA threshold. We compared the ability of our age-specific PSA threshold to discriminate between high- and no/low-risk prostate cancer with that of two existing thresholds: (i) threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages; (ii) National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines dependent on age-group thresholds (age 50–59: PSA = 3 ng/mL; age 60–70: PSA = 4 ng/mL; age ≥ 70: PSA = 5 ng/mL). RESULTS: We included 823 men with high-risk prostate cancer and 80,721 men with no/low-risk prostate cancer. A threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages identified more high-risk prostate cancers, recommending biopsy in 9.8% of men, of which 10.3% (n = 823) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the NICE guidelines as the threshold for biopsy, 6.9% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 11.9% (n = 668) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the new age-specific threshold for biopsy, 2.3% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 15.2% (n = 290) had high-risk prostate cancer. The age-specific threshold identified fewer high-risk prostate cancers, but fewer men received unnecessary biopsy. CONCLUSION: There is no benefit to using reference ranges for “normal” PSA that change with age nor the age-specific thresholds suggested by the NICE guidelines. While the age-varying thresholds are more discriminatory, too many high-risk cancers are missed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10552-018-1014-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5834577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58345772018-03-09 Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer Gilbert, Rebecca Tilling, Kate Martin, Richard M. Lane, J. Athene Davis, Michael Hamdy, Freddie C. Neal, David E. Donovan, Jenny L. Metcalfe, Chris Cancer Causes Control Brief Report PURPOSE: To examine whether age-related reference ranges for “normal” prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change (determined in men without prostate cancer) can be used to identify men at high risk of having prostate cancer. METHODS: Subjects were men aged 50–69 years with PSA < 10 ng/mL from the UK-based Prostate Testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study. Men with prostate cancer were categorized as high or low risk of progression (Low risk: Gleason score ≤ 6 and stage T1–T2a; High risk: Gleason score 7–10 or stage T2C). Men without prostate cancer were those with no histological confirmation of prostate cancer. Previously developed longitudinal reference ranges for normal age-related PSA change were used to calculate an age-specific PSA threshold. We compared the ability of our age-specific PSA threshold to discriminate between high- and no/low-risk prostate cancer with that of two existing thresholds: (i) threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages; (ii) National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines dependent on age-group thresholds (age 50–59: PSA = 3 ng/mL; age 60–70: PSA = 4 ng/mL; age ≥ 70: PSA = 5 ng/mL). RESULTS: We included 823 men with high-risk prostate cancer and 80,721 men with no/low-risk prostate cancer. A threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages identified more high-risk prostate cancers, recommending biopsy in 9.8% of men, of which 10.3% (n = 823) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the NICE guidelines as the threshold for biopsy, 6.9% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 11.9% (n = 668) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the new age-specific threshold for biopsy, 2.3% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 15.2% (n = 290) had high-risk prostate cancer. The age-specific threshold identified fewer high-risk prostate cancers, but fewer men received unnecessary biopsy. CONCLUSION: There is no benefit to using reference ranges for “normal” PSA that change with age nor the age-specific thresholds suggested by the NICE guidelines. While the age-varying thresholds are more discriminatory, too many high-risk cancers are missed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10552-018-1014-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-02-16 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5834577/ /pubmed/29453511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1014-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Gilbert, Rebecca Tilling, Kate Martin, Richard M. Lane, J. Athene Davis, Michael Hamdy, Freddie C. Neal, David E. Donovan, Jenny L. Metcalfe, Chris Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer |
title | Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer |
title_full | Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer |
title_short | Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer |
title_sort | developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29453511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1014-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilbertrebecca developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer AT tillingkate developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer AT martinrichardm developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer AT lanejathene developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer AT davismichael developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer AT hamdyfreddiec developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer AT nealdavide developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer AT donovanjennyl developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer AT metcalfechris developingnewagespecificprostatespecificantigenthresholdsfortestingforprostatecancer |