Cargando…

Using Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Practice: A Comparative Study of Five HTA Agencies

BACKGROUND: Reimbursement decisions are conventionally based on evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which often have high internal validity but low external validity. Real-world data (RWD) may provide complimentary evidence for relative effectiveness assessments (REAs) and cost-effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Makady, Amr, van Veelen, Ard, Jonsson, Páll, Moseley, Owen, D’Andon, Anne, de Boer, Anthonius, Hillege, Hans, Klungel, Olaf, Goettsch, Wim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29214389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0596-z
_version_ 1783303678969511936
author Makady, Amr
van Veelen, Ard
Jonsson, Páll
Moseley, Owen
D’Andon, Anne
de Boer, Anthonius
Hillege, Hans
Klungel, Olaf
Goettsch, Wim
author_facet Makady, Amr
van Veelen, Ard
Jonsson, Páll
Moseley, Owen
D’Andon, Anne
de Boer, Anthonius
Hillege, Hans
Klungel, Olaf
Goettsch, Wim
author_sort Makady, Amr
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reimbursement decisions are conventionally based on evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which often have high internal validity but low external validity. Real-world data (RWD) may provide complimentary evidence for relative effectiveness assessments (REAs) and cost-effectiveness assessments (CEAs). This study examines whether RWD is incorporated in health technology assessment (HTA) of melanoma drugs by European HTA agencies, as well as differences in RWD use between agencies and across time. METHODS: HTA reports published between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2016 were retrieved from websites of agencies representing five jurisdictions: England [National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)], Scotland [Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC)], France [Haute Autorité de santé (HAS)], Germany [Institute for Quality and Efficacy in Healthcare (IQWiG)] and The Netherlands [Zorginstituut Nederland (ZIN)]. A standardized data extraction form was used to extract information on RWD inclusion for both REAs and CEAs. RESULTS: Overall, 52 reports were retrieved, all of which contained REAs; CEAs were present in 25 of the reports. RWD was included in 28 of the 52 REAs (54%), mainly to estimate melanoma prevalence, and in 22 of the 25 (88%) CEAs, mainly to extrapolate long-term effectiveness and/or identify drug-related costs. Differences emerged between agencies regarding RWD use in REAs; the ZIN and IQWiG cited RWD for evidence on prevalence, whereas the NICE, SMC and HAS additionally cited RWD use for drug effectiveness. No visible trend for RWD use in REAs and CEAs over time was observed. CONCLUSION: In general, RWD inclusion was higher in CEAs than REAs, and was mostly used to estimate melanoma prevalence in REAs or to predict long-term effectiveness in CEAs. Differences emerged between agencies’ use of RWD; however, no visible trends for RWD use over time were observed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-017-0596-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5834594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58345942018-03-09 Using Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Practice: A Comparative Study of Five HTA Agencies Makady, Amr van Veelen, Ard Jonsson, Páll Moseley, Owen D’Andon, Anne de Boer, Anthonius Hillege, Hans Klungel, Olaf Goettsch, Wim Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Reimbursement decisions are conventionally based on evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which often have high internal validity but low external validity. Real-world data (RWD) may provide complimentary evidence for relative effectiveness assessments (REAs) and cost-effectiveness assessments (CEAs). This study examines whether RWD is incorporated in health technology assessment (HTA) of melanoma drugs by European HTA agencies, as well as differences in RWD use between agencies and across time. METHODS: HTA reports published between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2016 were retrieved from websites of agencies representing five jurisdictions: England [National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)], Scotland [Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC)], France [Haute Autorité de santé (HAS)], Germany [Institute for Quality and Efficacy in Healthcare (IQWiG)] and The Netherlands [Zorginstituut Nederland (ZIN)]. A standardized data extraction form was used to extract information on RWD inclusion for both REAs and CEAs. RESULTS: Overall, 52 reports were retrieved, all of which contained REAs; CEAs were present in 25 of the reports. RWD was included in 28 of the 52 REAs (54%), mainly to estimate melanoma prevalence, and in 22 of the 25 (88%) CEAs, mainly to extrapolate long-term effectiveness and/or identify drug-related costs. Differences emerged between agencies regarding RWD use in REAs; the ZIN and IQWiG cited RWD for evidence on prevalence, whereas the NICE, SMC and HAS additionally cited RWD use for drug effectiveness. No visible trend for RWD use in REAs and CEAs over time was observed. CONCLUSION: In general, RWD inclusion was higher in CEAs than REAs, and was mostly used to estimate melanoma prevalence in REAs or to predict long-term effectiveness in CEAs. Differences emerged between agencies’ use of RWD; however, no visible trends for RWD use over time were observed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-017-0596-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-12-06 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5834594/ /pubmed/29214389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0596-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Makady, Amr
van Veelen, Ard
Jonsson, Páll
Moseley, Owen
D’Andon, Anne
de Boer, Anthonius
Hillege, Hans
Klungel, Olaf
Goettsch, Wim
Using Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Practice: A Comparative Study of Five HTA Agencies
title Using Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Practice: A Comparative Study of Five HTA Agencies
title_full Using Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Practice: A Comparative Study of Five HTA Agencies
title_fullStr Using Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Practice: A Comparative Study of Five HTA Agencies
title_full_unstemmed Using Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Practice: A Comparative Study of Five HTA Agencies
title_short Using Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Practice: A Comparative Study of Five HTA Agencies
title_sort using real-world data in health technology assessment (hta) practice: a comparative study of five hta agencies
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29214389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0596-z
work_keys_str_mv AT makadyamr usingrealworlddatainhealthtechnologyassessmenthtapracticeacomparativestudyoffivehtaagencies
AT vanveelenard usingrealworlddatainhealthtechnologyassessmenthtapracticeacomparativestudyoffivehtaagencies
AT jonssonpall usingrealworlddatainhealthtechnologyassessmenthtapracticeacomparativestudyoffivehtaagencies
AT moseleyowen usingrealworlddatainhealthtechnologyassessmenthtapracticeacomparativestudyoffivehtaagencies
AT dandonanne usingrealworlddatainhealthtechnologyassessmenthtapracticeacomparativestudyoffivehtaagencies
AT deboeranthonius usingrealworlddatainhealthtechnologyassessmenthtapracticeacomparativestudyoffivehtaagencies
AT hillegehans usingrealworlddatainhealthtechnologyassessmenthtapracticeacomparativestudyoffivehtaagencies
AT klungelolaf usingrealworlddatainhealthtechnologyassessmenthtapracticeacomparativestudyoffivehtaagencies
AT goettschwim usingrealworlddatainhealthtechnologyassessmenthtapracticeacomparativestudyoffivehtaagencies