Cargando…
Feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions for informal cancer carers: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Carers looking after someone with cancer often experience negative impacts on their own health. M-health interventions have been designed to provide information and support to patients and their carers. However, the effectiveness of technology-based interventions for carers is less well...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29499663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4160-9 |
_version_ | 1783303719722418176 |
---|---|
author | Heynsbergh, Natalie Heckel, Leila Botti, Mari Livingston, Patricia M. |
author_facet | Heynsbergh, Natalie Heckel, Leila Botti, Mari Livingston, Patricia M. |
author_sort | Heynsbergh, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Carers looking after someone with cancer often experience negative impacts on their own health. M-health interventions have been designed to provide information and support to patients and their carers. However, the effectiveness of technology-based interventions for carers is less well understood. The objectives were to assess the feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions among carers of people living with cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of the CINAHL, MEDLINE and PSYCINFO databases was performed using terms related to web-based interventions and smartphone applications, carers and cancer. Studies were included if a randomised controlled trial or pilot study was conducted, focused on adult carers looking after another adult with cancer and were published between January 2007-June 2017. Articles were excluded if they reported qualitative results only or were evaluating existing websites and applications. Feasibility was measured by attrition, recruitment rates and frequency of intervention use; useability was measured by the ease of intervention use and the role of features to minimise errors in use. Acceptability was measured by carers’ perception of the appropriateness of the content and their ability to incorporate the intervention into their daily routines. RESULTS: Of the 729 articles, six articles met the inclusion criteria. Attrition ranged from 14% - 77%, recruitment rates from 20% - 66% and intervention useability varied across studies. Half of the studies implemented measures to improve useability. Overall, carers rated the content of the interventions as appropriate and reported improved knowledge and communication. Acceptability was further demonstrated as carers preferred the flexibility available with web-based interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Technology-based interventions are suitable for use among carers of people with cancer. Further research is required to fully assess the impact of technology as an information and support mechanism for carers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5834845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58348452018-03-05 Feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions for informal cancer carers: a systematic review Heynsbergh, Natalie Heckel, Leila Botti, Mari Livingston, Patricia M. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Carers looking after someone with cancer often experience negative impacts on their own health. M-health interventions have been designed to provide information and support to patients and their carers. However, the effectiveness of technology-based interventions for carers is less well understood. The objectives were to assess the feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions among carers of people living with cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of the CINAHL, MEDLINE and PSYCINFO databases was performed using terms related to web-based interventions and smartphone applications, carers and cancer. Studies were included if a randomised controlled trial or pilot study was conducted, focused on adult carers looking after another adult with cancer and were published between January 2007-June 2017. Articles were excluded if they reported qualitative results only or were evaluating existing websites and applications. Feasibility was measured by attrition, recruitment rates and frequency of intervention use; useability was measured by the ease of intervention use and the role of features to minimise errors in use. Acceptability was measured by carers’ perception of the appropriateness of the content and their ability to incorporate the intervention into their daily routines. RESULTS: Of the 729 articles, six articles met the inclusion criteria. Attrition ranged from 14% - 77%, recruitment rates from 20% - 66% and intervention useability varied across studies. Half of the studies implemented measures to improve useability. Overall, carers rated the content of the interventions as appropriate and reported improved knowledge and communication. Acceptability was further demonstrated as carers preferred the flexibility available with web-based interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Technology-based interventions are suitable for use among carers of people with cancer. Further research is required to fully assess the impact of technology as an information and support mechanism for carers. BioMed Central 2018-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5834845/ /pubmed/29499663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4160-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Heynsbergh, Natalie Heckel, Leila Botti, Mari Livingston, Patricia M. Feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions for informal cancer carers: a systematic review |
title | Feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions for informal cancer carers: a systematic review |
title_full | Feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions for informal cancer carers: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions for informal cancer carers: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions for informal cancer carers: a systematic review |
title_short | Feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions for informal cancer carers: a systematic review |
title_sort | feasibility, useability and acceptability of technology-based interventions for informal cancer carers: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29499663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4160-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heynsberghnatalie feasibilityuseabilityandacceptabilityoftechnologybasedinterventionsforinformalcancercarersasystematicreview AT heckelleila feasibilityuseabilityandacceptabilityoftechnologybasedinterventionsforinformalcancercarersasystematicreview AT bottimari feasibilityuseabilityandacceptabilityoftechnologybasedinterventionsforinformalcancercarersasystematicreview AT livingstonpatriciam feasibilityuseabilityandacceptabilityoftechnologybasedinterventionsforinformalcancercarersasystematicreview |