Cargando…

Systematic review of antiepileptic drugs’ safety and effectiveness in feline epilepsy

BACKGROUND: Understanding the efficacy and safety profile of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in feline epilepsy is a crucial consideration for managing this important brain disease. However, there is a lack of information about the treatment of feline epilepsy and therefore a systematic review was constr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charalambous, Marios, Pakozdy, Akos, Bhatti, Sofie F. M., Volk, Holger A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29499762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1386-3
_version_ 1783303728872292352
author Charalambous, Marios
Pakozdy, Akos
Bhatti, Sofie F. M.
Volk, Holger A.
author_facet Charalambous, Marios
Pakozdy, Akos
Bhatti, Sofie F. M.
Volk, Holger A.
author_sort Charalambous, Marios
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding the efficacy and safety profile of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in feline epilepsy is a crucial consideration for managing this important brain disease. However, there is a lack of information about the treatment of feline epilepsy and therefore a systematic review was constructed to assess current evidence for the AEDs’ efficacy and tolerability in cats. The methods and materials of our former systematic reviews in canine epilepsy were mostly mirrored for the current systematic review in cats. Databases of PubMed, CAB Direct and Google scholar were searched to detect peer-reviewed studies reporting efficacy and/or adverse effects of AEDs in cats. The studies were assessed with regards to their quality of evidence, i.e. study design, study population, diagnostic criteria and overall risk of bias and the outcome measures reported, i.e. prevalence and 95% confidence interval of the successful and affected population in each study and in total. RESULTS: Forty studies describing clinical outcomes of AEDs’ efficacy and safety were included. Only two studies were classified as “blinded randomised controlled trials”. The majority of the studies offered high overall risk of bias and described low feline populations with unclear diagnostic criteria and short treatment or follow-up periods. Individual AED assessments of efficacy and safety profile showed that phenobarbital might currently be considered as the first choice AED followed by levetiracetam and imepitoin. Only imepitoin’s safety profile was supported by strong level of evidence. Imepitoin’s efficacy as well as remaining AEDs’ efficacy and safety profile were supported by weak level of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review reflects an evidence-based assessment of the published data on the AEDs’ efficacy and safety for feline epilepsy. Currently, phenobarbital is likely to be the first-line for feline epileptic patients followed by levetiracetam and imepitoin. It is essential that clinicians evaluate both AEDs’ effectiveness and tolerability before tailoring AED to the individual patient. Further studies in feline epilepsy treatment are by far crucial in order to establish definite guidelines for AEDs’ efficacy and safety. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-018-1386-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5834883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58348832018-03-05 Systematic review of antiepileptic drugs’ safety and effectiveness in feline epilepsy Charalambous, Marios Pakozdy, Akos Bhatti, Sofie F. M. Volk, Holger A. BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding the efficacy and safety profile of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in feline epilepsy is a crucial consideration for managing this important brain disease. However, there is a lack of information about the treatment of feline epilepsy and therefore a systematic review was constructed to assess current evidence for the AEDs’ efficacy and tolerability in cats. The methods and materials of our former systematic reviews in canine epilepsy were mostly mirrored for the current systematic review in cats. Databases of PubMed, CAB Direct and Google scholar were searched to detect peer-reviewed studies reporting efficacy and/or adverse effects of AEDs in cats. The studies were assessed with regards to their quality of evidence, i.e. study design, study population, diagnostic criteria and overall risk of bias and the outcome measures reported, i.e. prevalence and 95% confidence interval of the successful and affected population in each study and in total. RESULTS: Forty studies describing clinical outcomes of AEDs’ efficacy and safety were included. Only two studies were classified as “blinded randomised controlled trials”. The majority of the studies offered high overall risk of bias and described low feline populations with unclear diagnostic criteria and short treatment or follow-up periods. Individual AED assessments of efficacy and safety profile showed that phenobarbital might currently be considered as the first choice AED followed by levetiracetam and imepitoin. Only imepitoin’s safety profile was supported by strong level of evidence. Imepitoin’s efficacy as well as remaining AEDs’ efficacy and safety profile were supported by weak level of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review reflects an evidence-based assessment of the published data on the AEDs’ efficacy and safety for feline epilepsy. Currently, phenobarbital is likely to be the first-line for feline epileptic patients followed by levetiracetam and imepitoin. It is essential that clinicians evaluate both AEDs’ effectiveness and tolerability before tailoring AED to the individual patient. Further studies in feline epilepsy treatment are by far crucial in order to establish definite guidelines for AEDs’ efficacy and safety. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-018-1386-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5834883/ /pubmed/29499762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1386-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Charalambous, Marios
Pakozdy, Akos
Bhatti, Sofie F. M.
Volk, Holger A.
Systematic review of antiepileptic drugs’ safety and effectiveness in feline epilepsy
title Systematic review of antiepileptic drugs’ safety and effectiveness in feline epilepsy
title_full Systematic review of antiepileptic drugs’ safety and effectiveness in feline epilepsy
title_fullStr Systematic review of antiepileptic drugs’ safety and effectiveness in feline epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of antiepileptic drugs’ safety and effectiveness in feline epilepsy
title_short Systematic review of antiepileptic drugs’ safety and effectiveness in feline epilepsy
title_sort systematic review of antiepileptic drugs’ safety and effectiveness in feline epilepsy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5834883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29499762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1386-3
work_keys_str_mv AT charalambousmarios systematicreviewofantiepilepticdrugssafetyandeffectivenessinfelineepilepsy
AT pakozdyakos systematicreviewofantiepilepticdrugssafetyandeffectivenessinfelineepilepsy
AT bhattisofiefm systematicreviewofantiepilepticdrugssafetyandeffectivenessinfelineepilepsy
AT volkholgera systematicreviewofantiepilepticdrugssafetyandeffectivenessinfelineepilepsy