Cargando…

Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase

The accuracy of an exhaustive ramp incremental (RI) test to determine maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2max)) was recently questioned and the utilization of a verification phase proposed as a gold standard. This study compared the oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2)) during a RI test...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murias, Juan M., Pogliaghi, Silvia, Paterson, Donald H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535642
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00143
_version_ 1783303768159289344
author Murias, Juan M.
Pogliaghi, Silvia
Paterson, Donald H.
author_facet Murias, Juan M.
Pogliaghi, Silvia
Paterson, Donald H.
author_sort Murias, Juan M.
collection PubMed
description The accuracy of an exhaustive ramp incremental (RI) test to determine maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2max)) was recently questioned and the utilization of a verification phase proposed as a gold standard. This study compared the oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2)) during a RI test to that obtained during a verification phase aimed to confirm attainment of [Formula: see text] O(2max). Sixty-one healthy males [31 older (O) 65 ± 5 yrs; 30 younger (Y) 25 ± 4 yrs] performed a RI test (15–20 W/min for O and 25 W/min for Y). At the end of the RI test, a 5-min recovery period was followed by a verification phase of constant load cycling to fatigue at either 85% (n = 16) or 105% (n = 45) of the peak power output obtained from the RI test. The highest [Formula: see text] O(2) after the RI test (39.8 ± 11.5 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) and the verification phase (40.1 ± 11.2 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) were not different (p = 0.33) and they were highly correlated (r = 0.99; p < 0.01). This response was not affected by age or intensity of the verification phase. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a very small absolute bias (−0.25 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1), not different from 0) and a precision of ±1.56 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1) between measures. This study indicated that a verification phase does not highlight an under-estimation of [Formula: see text] O(2max) derived from a RI test, in a large and heterogeneous group of healthy younger and older men naïve to laboratory testing procedures. Moreover, only minor within-individual differences were observed between the maximal [Formula: see text] O(2) elicited during the RI and the verification phase. Thus a verification phase does not add any validation of the determination of a [Formula: see text] O(2max). Therefore, the recommendation that a verification phase should become a gold standard procedure, although initially appealing, is not supported by the experimental data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5835126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58351262018-03-13 Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase Murias, Juan M. Pogliaghi, Silvia Paterson, Donald H. Front Physiol Physiology The accuracy of an exhaustive ramp incremental (RI) test to determine maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2max)) was recently questioned and the utilization of a verification phase proposed as a gold standard. This study compared the oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2)) during a RI test to that obtained during a verification phase aimed to confirm attainment of [Formula: see text] O(2max). Sixty-one healthy males [31 older (O) 65 ± 5 yrs; 30 younger (Y) 25 ± 4 yrs] performed a RI test (15–20 W/min for O and 25 W/min for Y). At the end of the RI test, a 5-min recovery period was followed by a verification phase of constant load cycling to fatigue at either 85% (n = 16) or 105% (n = 45) of the peak power output obtained from the RI test. The highest [Formula: see text] O(2) after the RI test (39.8 ± 11.5 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) and the verification phase (40.1 ± 11.2 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) were not different (p = 0.33) and they were highly correlated (r = 0.99; p < 0.01). This response was not affected by age or intensity of the verification phase. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a very small absolute bias (−0.25 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1), not different from 0) and a precision of ±1.56 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1) between measures. This study indicated that a verification phase does not highlight an under-estimation of [Formula: see text] O(2max) derived from a RI test, in a large and heterogeneous group of healthy younger and older men naïve to laboratory testing procedures. Moreover, only minor within-individual differences were observed between the maximal [Formula: see text] O(2) elicited during the RI and the verification phase. Thus a verification phase does not add any validation of the determination of a [Formula: see text] O(2max). Therefore, the recommendation that a verification phase should become a gold standard procedure, although initially appealing, is not supported by the experimental data. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5835126/ /pubmed/29535642 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00143 Text en Copyright © 2018 Murias, Pogliaghi and Paterson. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Murias, Juan M.
Pogliaghi, Silvia
Paterson, Donald H.
Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase
title Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase
title_full Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase
title_fullStr Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase
title_short Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase
title_sort measurement of a true [formula: see text] o(2max) during a ramp incremental test is not confirmed by a verification phase
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535642
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00143
work_keys_str_mv AT muriasjuanm measurementofatrueformulaseetexto2maxduringarampincrementaltestisnotconfirmedbyaverificationphase
AT pogliaghisilvia measurementofatrueformulaseetexto2maxduringarampincrementaltestisnotconfirmedbyaverificationphase
AT patersondonaldh measurementofatrueformulaseetexto2maxduringarampincrementaltestisnotconfirmedbyaverificationphase