Cargando…
Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase
The accuracy of an exhaustive ramp incremental (RI) test to determine maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2max)) was recently questioned and the utilization of a verification phase proposed as a gold standard. This study compared the oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2)) during a RI test...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535642 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00143 |
_version_ | 1783303768159289344 |
---|---|
author | Murias, Juan M. Pogliaghi, Silvia Paterson, Donald H. |
author_facet | Murias, Juan M. Pogliaghi, Silvia Paterson, Donald H. |
author_sort | Murias, Juan M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The accuracy of an exhaustive ramp incremental (RI) test to determine maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2max)) was recently questioned and the utilization of a verification phase proposed as a gold standard. This study compared the oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2)) during a RI test to that obtained during a verification phase aimed to confirm attainment of [Formula: see text] O(2max). Sixty-one healthy males [31 older (O) 65 ± 5 yrs; 30 younger (Y) 25 ± 4 yrs] performed a RI test (15–20 W/min for O and 25 W/min for Y). At the end of the RI test, a 5-min recovery period was followed by a verification phase of constant load cycling to fatigue at either 85% (n = 16) or 105% (n = 45) of the peak power output obtained from the RI test. The highest [Formula: see text] O(2) after the RI test (39.8 ± 11.5 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) and the verification phase (40.1 ± 11.2 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) were not different (p = 0.33) and they were highly correlated (r = 0.99; p < 0.01). This response was not affected by age or intensity of the verification phase. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a very small absolute bias (−0.25 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1), not different from 0) and a precision of ±1.56 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1) between measures. This study indicated that a verification phase does not highlight an under-estimation of [Formula: see text] O(2max) derived from a RI test, in a large and heterogeneous group of healthy younger and older men naïve to laboratory testing procedures. Moreover, only minor within-individual differences were observed between the maximal [Formula: see text] O(2) elicited during the RI and the verification phase. Thus a verification phase does not add any validation of the determination of a [Formula: see text] O(2max). Therefore, the recommendation that a verification phase should become a gold standard procedure, although initially appealing, is not supported by the experimental data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5835126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58351262018-03-13 Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase Murias, Juan M. Pogliaghi, Silvia Paterson, Donald H. Front Physiol Physiology The accuracy of an exhaustive ramp incremental (RI) test to determine maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2max)) was recently questioned and the utilization of a verification phase proposed as a gold standard. This study compared the oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2)) during a RI test to that obtained during a verification phase aimed to confirm attainment of [Formula: see text] O(2max). Sixty-one healthy males [31 older (O) 65 ± 5 yrs; 30 younger (Y) 25 ± 4 yrs] performed a RI test (15–20 W/min for O and 25 W/min for Y). At the end of the RI test, a 5-min recovery period was followed by a verification phase of constant load cycling to fatigue at either 85% (n = 16) or 105% (n = 45) of the peak power output obtained from the RI test. The highest [Formula: see text] O(2) after the RI test (39.8 ± 11.5 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) and the verification phase (40.1 ± 11.2 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) were not different (p = 0.33) and they were highly correlated (r = 0.99; p < 0.01). This response was not affected by age or intensity of the verification phase. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a very small absolute bias (−0.25 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1), not different from 0) and a precision of ±1.56 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1) between measures. This study indicated that a verification phase does not highlight an under-estimation of [Formula: see text] O(2max) derived from a RI test, in a large and heterogeneous group of healthy younger and older men naïve to laboratory testing procedures. Moreover, only minor within-individual differences were observed between the maximal [Formula: see text] O(2) elicited during the RI and the verification phase. Thus a verification phase does not add any validation of the determination of a [Formula: see text] O(2max). Therefore, the recommendation that a verification phase should become a gold standard procedure, although initially appealing, is not supported by the experimental data. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5835126/ /pubmed/29535642 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00143 Text en Copyright © 2018 Murias, Pogliaghi and Paterson. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Murias, Juan M. Pogliaghi, Silvia Paterson, Donald H. Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase |
title | Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase |
title_full | Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase |
title_fullStr | Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase |
title_short | Measurement of a True [Formula: see text] O(2max) during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase |
title_sort | measurement of a true [formula: see text] o(2max) during a ramp incremental test is not confirmed by a verification phase |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535642 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muriasjuanm measurementofatrueformulaseetexto2maxduringarampincrementaltestisnotconfirmedbyaverificationphase AT pogliaghisilvia measurementofatrueformulaseetexto2maxduringarampincrementaltestisnotconfirmedbyaverificationphase AT patersondonaldh measurementofatrueformulaseetexto2maxduringarampincrementaltestisnotconfirmedbyaverificationphase |