Cargando…

Gadolinium-Free Cardiac MR Stress T1-Mapping to Distinguish Epicardial From Microvascular Coronary Disease

BACKGROUND: Novel cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) stress T1 mapping can detect ischemia and myocardial blood volume changes without contrast agents and may be a more comprehensive ischemia biomarker than myocardial blood flow. OBJECTIVES: This study describes the performance of the first prospectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Alexander, Wijesurendra, Rohan S., Liu, Joanna M., Greiser, Andreas, Jerosch-Herold, Michael, Forfar, John C., Channon, Keith M., Piechnik, Stefan K., Neubauer, Stefan, Kharbanda, Rajesh K., Ferreira, Vanessa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Biomedical 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29495995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.071
_version_ 1783303774523097088
author Liu, Alexander
Wijesurendra, Rohan S.
Liu, Joanna M.
Greiser, Andreas
Jerosch-Herold, Michael
Forfar, John C.
Channon, Keith M.
Piechnik, Stefan K.
Neubauer, Stefan
Kharbanda, Rajesh K.
Ferreira, Vanessa M.
author_facet Liu, Alexander
Wijesurendra, Rohan S.
Liu, Joanna M.
Greiser, Andreas
Jerosch-Herold, Michael
Forfar, John C.
Channon, Keith M.
Piechnik, Stefan K.
Neubauer, Stefan
Kharbanda, Rajesh K.
Ferreira, Vanessa M.
author_sort Liu, Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Novel cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) stress T1 mapping can detect ischemia and myocardial blood volume changes without contrast agents and may be a more comprehensive ischemia biomarker than myocardial blood flow. OBJECTIVES: This study describes the performance of the first prospective validation of stress T1 mapping against invasive coronary measurements for detecting obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD), defined by fractional flow reserve (FFR <0.8), and coronary microvascular dysfunction, defined by FFR ≥0.8 and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR ≥25 U), compared with first-pass perfusion imaging. METHODS: Ninety subjects (60 patients with angina; 30 healthy control subjects) underwent CMR (1.5- and 3-T) to assess left ventricular function (cine), ischemia (adenosine stress/rest T1 mapping and perfusion), and infarction (late gadolinium enhancement). FFR and IMR were assessed ≤7 days post-CMR. Stress and rest images were analyzed blinded to other information. RESULTS: Normal myocardial T1 reactivity (ΔT1) was 6.2 ± 0.4% (1.5-T) and 6.2 ± 1.3% (3-T). Ischemic viable myocardium downstream of obstructive CAD showed near-abolished T1 reactivity (ΔT1 = 0.7 ± 0.7%). Myocardium downstream of nonobstructive coronary arteries with microvascular dysfunction showed less-blunted T1 reactivity (ΔT1 = 3.0 ± 0.9%). Stress T1 mapping significantly outperformed gadolinium-based first-pass perfusion, including absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow, for detecting obstructive CAD (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.97 ± 0.02 vs. 0.91 ± 0.03, respectively; p < 0.001). A ΔT1 of 1.5% accurately detected obstructive CAD (sensitivity: 93%; specificity: 95%; p < 0.001), whereas a less-blunted ΔT1 of 4.0% accurately detected microvascular dysfunction (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.95 ± 0.03; sensitivity: 94%; specificity: 94%: p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CMR stress T1 mapping accurately detected and differentiated between obstructive epicardial CAD and microvascular dysfunction, without contrast agents or radiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5835225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier Biomedical
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58352252018-03-07 Gadolinium-Free Cardiac MR Stress T1-Mapping to Distinguish Epicardial From Microvascular Coronary Disease Liu, Alexander Wijesurendra, Rohan S. Liu, Joanna M. Greiser, Andreas Jerosch-Herold, Michael Forfar, John C. Channon, Keith M. Piechnik, Stefan K. Neubauer, Stefan Kharbanda, Rajesh K. Ferreira, Vanessa M. J Am Coll Cardiol Article BACKGROUND: Novel cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) stress T1 mapping can detect ischemia and myocardial blood volume changes without contrast agents and may be a more comprehensive ischemia biomarker than myocardial blood flow. OBJECTIVES: This study describes the performance of the first prospective validation of stress T1 mapping against invasive coronary measurements for detecting obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD), defined by fractional flow reserve (FFR <0.8), and coronary microvascular dysfunction, defined by FFR ≥0.8 and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR ≥25 U), compared with first-pass perfusion imaging. METHODS: Ninety subjects (60 patients with angina; 30 healthy control subjects) underwent CMR (1.5- and 3-T) to assess left ventricular function (cine), ischemia (adenosine stress/rest T1 mapping and perfusion), and infarction (late gadolinium enhancement). FFR and IMR were assessed ≤7 days post-CMR. Stress and rest images were analyzed blinded to other information. RESULTS: Normal myocardial T1 reactivity (ΔT1) was 6.2 ± 0.4% (1.5-T) and 6.2 ± 1.3% (3-T). Ischemic viable myocardium downstream of obstructive CAD showed near-abolished T1 reactivity (ΔT1 = 0.7 ± 0.7%). Myocardium downstream of nonobstructive coronary arteries with microvascular dysfunction showed less-blunted T1 reactivity (ΔT1 = 3.0 ± 0.9%). Stress T1 mapping significantly outperformed gadolinium-based first-pass perfusion, including absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow, for detecting obstructive CAD (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.97 ± 0.02 vs. 0.91 ± 0.03, respectively; p < 0.001). A ΔT1 of 1.5% accurately detected obstructive CAD (sensitivity: 93%; specificity: 95%; p < 0.001), whereas a less-blunted ΔT1 of 4.0% accurately detected microvascular dysfunction (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.95 ± 0.03; sensitivity: 94%; specificity: 94%: p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CMR stress T1 mapping accurately detected and differentiated between obstructive epicardial CAD and microvascular dysfunction, without contrast agents or radiation. Elsevier Biomedical 2018-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5835225/ /pubmed/29495995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.071 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Alexander
Wijesurendra, Rohan S.
Liu, Joanna M.
Greiser, Andreas
Jerosch-Herold, Michael
Forfar, John C.
Channon, Keith M.
Piechnik, Stefan K.
Neubauer, Stefan
Kharbanda, Rajesh K.
Ferreira, Vanessa M.
Gadolinium-Free Cardiac MR Stress T1-Mapping to Distinguish Epicardial From Microvascular Coronary Disease
title Gadolinium-Free Cardiac MR Stress T1-Mapping to Distinguish Epicardial From Microvascular Coronary Disease
title_full Gadolinium-Free Cardiac MR Stress T1-Mapping to Distinguish Epicardial From Microvascular Coronary Disease
title_fullStr Gadolinium-Free Cardiac MR Stress T1-Mapping to Distinguish Epicardial From Microvascular Coronary Disease
title_full_unstemmed Gadolinium-Free Cardiac MR Stress T1-Mapping to Distinguish Epicardial From Microvascular Coronary Disease
title_short Gadolinium-Free Cardiac MR Stress T1-Mapping to Distinguish Epicardial From Microvascular Coronary Disease
title_sort gadolinium-free cardiac mr stress t1-mapping to distinguish epicardial from microvascular coronary disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29495995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.071
work_keys_str_mv AT liualexander gadoliniumfreecardiacmrstresst1mappingtodistinguishepicardialfrommicrovascularcoronarydisease
AT wijesurendrarohans gadoliniumfreecardiacmrstresst1mappingtodistinguishepicardialfrommicrovascularcoronarydisease
AT liujoannam gadoliniumfreecardiacmrstresst1mappingtodistinguishepicardialfrommicrovascularcoronarydisease
AT greiserandreas gadoliniumfreecardiacmrstresst1mappingtodistinguishepicardialfrommicrovascularcoronarydisease
AT jeroschheroldmichael gadoliniumfreecardiacmrstresst1mappingtodistinguishepicardialfrommicrovascularcoronarydisease
AT forfarjohnc gadoliniumfreecardiacmrstresst1mappingtodistinguishepicardialfrommicrovascularcoronarydisease
AT channonkeithm gadoliniumfreecardiacmrstresst1mappingtodistinguishepicardialfrommicrovascularcoronarydisease
AT piechnikstefank gadoliniumfreecardiacmrstresst1mappingtodistinguishepicardialfrommicrovascularcoronarydisease
AT neubauerstefan gadoliniumfreecardiacmrstresst1mappingtodistinguishepicardialfrommicrovascularcoronarydisease
AT kharbandarajeshk gadoliniumfreecardiacmrstresst1mappingtodistinguishepicardialfrommicrovascularcoronarydisease
AT ferreiravanessam gadoliniumfreecardiacmrstresst1mappingtodistinguishepicardialfrommicrovascularcoronarydisease