Cargando…

Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluation Studies Developed in Brazil from 1980 to 2013

BACKGROUND: Brazil has sought to use economic evaluation to support healthcare decision-making processes. While a number of health economic evaluations (HEEs) have been conducted, no study has systematically reviewed the quality of Brazilian HEE. The objective of this systematic review was to provid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Decimoni, Tassia Cristina, Leandro, Roseli, Rozman, Luciana Martins, Craig, Dawn, Iglesias, Cynthia P., Novaes, Hillegonda Maria Dutilh, de Soárez, Patrícia Coelho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541630
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00052
_version_ 1783303881998991360
author Decimoni, Tassia Cristina
Leandro, Roseli
Rozman, Luciana Martins
Craig, Dawn
Iglesias, Cynthia P.
Novaes, Hillegonda Maria Dutilh
de Soárez, Patrícia Coelho
author_facet Decimoni, Tassia Cristina
Leandro, Roseli
Rozman, Luciana Martins
Craig, Dawn
Iglesias, Cynthia P.
Novaes, Hillegonda Maria Dutilh
de Soárez, Patrícia Coelho
author_sort Decimoni, Tassia Cristina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Brazil has sought to use economic evaluation to support healthcare decision-making processes. While a number of health economic evaluations (HEEs) have been conducted, no study has systematically reviewed the quality of Brazilian HEE. The objective of this systematic review was to provide an overview regarding the state of HEE research and to evaluate the number, characteristics, and quality of reporting of published HEE studies conducted in a Brazilian setting. METHODS: We systematically searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Latin American, and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences Database, Scientific Electronic Library Online, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, health technology assessment Database, Bireme, and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde Economia da Saúde); citation indexes (SCOPUS, Web of Science), and Sistema de Informação da Rede Brasileira de Avaliação de Tecnologia em Saúde. Partial and full HEEs published between 1980 and 2013 that referred to a Brazilian setting were considered for inclusion. RESULTS: In total, 535 studies were included in the review, 36.8% of these were considered to be full HEE. The category of healthcare technologies more frequently assessed were procedures (34.8%) and drugs (28.8%) which main objective was treatment (72.1%). Forty-four percent of the studies reported their funding source and 36% reported a conflict of interest. Overall, the full HEE quality of reporting was satisfactory. But some items were generally poorly reported and significant improvement is required: (1) methods used to estimate healthcare resource use quantities and unit costs, (2) methods used to estimate utility values, (3) sources of funding, and (4) conflicts of interest. CONCLUSION: A steady number of HEE have been published in Brazil since 1980. To improve their contribution to inform national healthcare policy efforts need to be made to enhance the quality of reporting of HEEs and promote improvements in the way HEEs are designed, implemented (i.e., using sound methods for HEEs) and reported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5835950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58359502018-03-14 Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluation Studies Developed in Brazil from 1980 to 2013 Decimoni, Tassia Cristina Leandro, Roseli Rozman, Luciana Martins Craig, Dawn Iglesias, Cynthia P. Novaes, Hillegonda Maria Dutilh de Soárez, Patrícia Coelho Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Brazil has sought to use economic evaluation to support healthcare decision-making processes. While a number of health economic evaluations (HEEs) have been conducted, no study has systematically reviewed the quality of Brazilian HEE. The objective of this systematic review was to provide an overview regarding the state of HEE research and to evaluate the number, characteristics, and quality of reporting of published HEE studies conducted in a Brazilian setting. METHODS: We systematically searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Latin American, and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences Database, Scientific Electronic Library Online, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, health technology assessment Database, Bireme, and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde Economia da Saúde); citation indexes (SCOPUS, Web of Science), and Sistema de Informação da Rede Brasileira de Avaliação de Tecnologia em Saúde. Partial and full HEEs published between 1980 and 2013 that referred to a Brazilian setting were considered for inclusion. RESULTS: In total, 535 studies were included in the review, 36.8% of these were considered to be full HEE. The category of healthcare technologies more frequently assessed were procedures (34.8%) and drugs (28.8%) which main objective was treatment (72.1%). Forty-four percent of the studies reported their funding source and 36% reported a conflict of interest. Overall, the full HEE quality of reporting was satisfactory. But some items were generally poorly reported and significant improvement is required: (1) methods used to estimate healthcare resource use quantities and unit costs, (2) methods used to estimate utility values, (3) sources of funding, and (4) conflicts of interest. CONCLUSION: A steady number of HEE have been published in Brazil since 1980. To improve their contribution to inform national healthcare policy efforts need to be made to enhance the quality of reporting of HEEs and promote improvements in the way HEEs are designed, implemented (i.e., using sound methods for HEEs) and reported. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5835950/ /pubmed/29541630 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00052 Text en Copyright © 2018 Decimoni, Leandro, Rozman, Craig, Iglesias, Novaes and de Soárez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Decimoni, Tassia Cristina
Leandro, Roseli
Rozman, Luciana Martins
Craig, Dawn
Iglesias, Cynthia P.
Novaes, Hillegonda Maria Dutilh
de Soárez, Patrícia Coelho
Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluation Studies Developed in Brazil from 1980 to 2013
title Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluation Studies Developed in Brazil from 1980 to 2013
title_full Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluation Studies Developed in Brazil from 1980 to 2013
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluation Studies Developed in Brazil from 1980 to 2013
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluation Studies Developed in Brazil from 1980 to 2013
title_short Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluation Studies Developed in Brazil from 1980 to 2013
title_sort systematic review of health economic evaluation studies developed in brazil from 1980 to 2013
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541630
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00052
work_keys_str_mv AT decimonitassiacristina systematicreviewofhealtheconomicevaluationstudiesdevelopedinbrazilfrom1980to2013
AT leandroroseli systematicreviewofhealtheconomicevaluationstudiesdevelopedinbrazilfrom1980to2013
AT rozmanlucianamartins systematicreviewofhealtheconomicevaluationstudiesdevelopedinbrazilfrom1980to2013
AT craigdawn systematicreviewofhealtheconomicevaluationstudiesdevelopedinbrazilfrom1980to2013
AT iglesiascynthiap systematicreviewofhealtheconomicevaluationstudiesdevelopedinbrazilfrom1980to2013
AT novaeshillegondamariadutilh systematicreviewofhealtheconomicevaluationstudiesdevelopedinbrazilfrom1980to2013
AT desoarezpatriciacoelho systematicreviewofhealtheconomicevaluationstudiesdevelopedinbrazilfrom1980to2013