Cargando…

The Impact of Excluding Food Guarding from a Standardized Behavioral Canine Assessment in Animal Shelters

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Recent research has called into question the value of the food guarding assessment as a predictive tool for determining the safety of shelter dogs. This study examined the effect of eliminating the food guarding assessment in nine U.S. animal shelters. It was found that when the food...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohan-Gibbons, Heather, Dolan, Emily D., Reid, Pamela, Slater, Margaret R., Mulligan, Hugh, Weiss, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29419746
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8020027
_version_ 1783303898483654656
author Mohan-Gibbons, Heather
Dolan, Emily D.
Reid, Pamela
Slater, Margaret R.
Mulligan, Hugh
Weiss, Emily
author_facet Mohan-Gibbons, Heather
Dolan, Emily D.
Reid, Pamela
Slater, Margaret R.
Mulligan, Hugh
Weiss, Emily
author_sort Mohan-Gibbons, Heather
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Recent research has called into question the value of the food guarding assessment as a predictive tool for determining the safety of shelter dogs. This study examined the effect of eliminating the food guarding assessment in nine U.S. animal shelters. It was found that when the food guarding assessment was removed, bites or other injuries to staff or adopters did not increase. However, dogs exhibiting food guarding behavior were less likely to be adopted, had a longer shelter stay, and were more likely to be euthanized than dogs in the general population. Based on previous research and this study’s findings, the authors recommend that shelters discontinue the food guarding assessment. ABSTRACT: Many shelters euthanize or restrict adoptions for dogs that exhibit food guarding while in the animal shelter. However, previous research showed that only half the dogs exhibiting food guarding during an assessment food guard in the home. So, dogs are often misidentified as future food guarders during shelter assessments. We examined the impact of shelters omitting food guarding assessments. Nine shelters conducted a two-month baseline period of assessing for food guarding followed by a two-month investigative period during which they omitted the food guarding assessment. Dogs that guarded their food during a standardized assessment were less likely to be adopted, had a longer shelter stay, and were more likely to be euthanized. When the shelters stopped assessing for food guarding, there was no significant difference in the rate of returns of food guarding dogs, even though more dogs were adopted because fewer were identified with food guarding behavior. Additionally, the number of injuries to staff, volunteers, and adopters was low (104 incidents from a total of 14,180 dogs) and did not change when the food guarding assessment was omitted. These results support a recommendation that shelters discontinue the food guarding assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5836035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58360352018-03-07 The Impact of Excluding Food Guarding from a Standardized Behavioral Canine Assessment in Animal Shelters Mohan-Gibbons, Heather Dolan, Emily D. Reid, Pamela Slater, Margaret R. Mulligan, Hugh Weiss, Emily Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Recent research has called into question the value of the food guarding assessment as a predictive tool for determining the safety of shelter dogs. This study examined the effect of eliminating the food guarding assessment in nine U.S. animal shelters. It was found that when the food guarding assessment was removed, bites or other injuries to staff or adopters did not increase. However, dogs exhibiting food guarding behavior were less likely to be adopted, had a longer shelter stay, and were more likely to be euthanized than dogs in the general population. Based on previous research and this study’s findings, the authors recommend that shelters discontinue the food guarding assessment. ABSTRACT: Many shelters euthanize or restrict adoptions for dogs that exhibit food guarding while in the animal shelter. However, previous research showed that only half the dogs exhibiting food guarding during an assessment food guard in the home. So, dogs are often misidentified as future food guarders during shelter assessments. We examined the impact of shelters omitting food guarding assessments. Nine shelters conducted a two-month baseline period of assessing for food guarding followed by a two-month investigative period during which they omitted the food guarding assessment. Dogs that guarded their food during a standardized assessment were less likely to be adopted, had a longer shelter stay, and were more likely to be euthanized. When the shelters stopped assessing for food guarding, there was no significant difference in the rate of returns of food guarding dogs, even though more dogs were adopted because fewer were identified with food guarding behavior. Additionally, the number of injuries to staff, volunteers, and adopters was low (104 incidents from a total of 14,180 dogs) and did not change when the food guarding assessment was omitted. These results support a recommendation that shelters discontinue the food guarding assessment. MDPI 2018-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5836035/ /pubmed/29419746 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8020027 Text en © 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mohan-Gibbons, Heather
Dolan, Emily D.
Reid, Pamela
Slater, Margaret R.
Mulligan, Hugh
Weiss, Emily
The Impact of Excluding Food Guarding from a Standardized Behavioral Canine Assessment in Animal Shelters
title The Impact of Excluding Food Guarding from a Standardized Behavioral Canine Assessment in Animal Shelters
title_full The Impact of Excluding Food Guarding from a Standardized Behavioral Canine Assessment in Animal Shelters
title_fullStr The Impact of Excluding Food Guarding from a Standardized Behavioral Canine Assessment in Animal Shelters
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Excluding Food Guarding from a Standardized Behavioral Canine Assessment in Animal Shelters
title_short The Impact of Excluding Food Guarding from a Standardized Behavioral Canine Assessment in Animal Shelters
title_sort impact of excluding food guarding from a standardized behavioral canine assessment in animal shelters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29419746
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8020027
work_keys_str_mv AT mohangibbonsheather theimpactofexcludingfoodguardingfromastandardizedbehavioralcanineassessmentinanimalshelters
AT dolanemilyd theimpactofexcludingfoodguardingfromastandardizedbehavioralcanineassessmentinanimalshelters
AT reidpamela theimpactofexcludingfoodguardingfromastandardizedbehavioralcanineassessmentinanimalshelters
AT slatermargaretr theimpactofexcludingfoodguardingfromastandardizedbehavioralcanineassessmentinanimalshelters
AT mulliganhugh theimpactofexcludingfoodguardingfromastandardizedbehavioralcanineassessmentinanimalshelters
AT weissemily theimpactofexcludingfoodguardingfromastandardizedbehavioralcanineassessmentinanimalshelters
AT mohangibbonsheather impactofexcludingfoodguardingfromastandardizedbehavioralcanineassessmentinanimalshelters
AT dolanemilyd impactofexcludingfoodguardingfromastandardizedbehavioralcanineassessmentinanimalshelters
AT reidpamela impactofexcludingfoodguardingfromastandardizedbehavioralcanineassessmentinanimalshelters
AT slatermargaretr impactofexcludingfoodguardingfromastandardizedbehavioralcanineassessmentinanimalshelters
AT mulliganhugh impactofexcludingfoodguardingfromastandardizedbehavioralcanineassessmentinanimalshelters
AT weissemily impactofexcludingfoodguardingfromastandardizedbehavioralcanineassessmentinanimalshelters