Cargando…

Development and validation of the quality care questionnaire –palliative care (QCQ-PC): patient-reported assessment of quality of palliative care

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to develop and validate an instrument that could be used by patients with cancer to evaluate their quality of palliative care. METHODS: Development of the questionnaire followed the four-phase process: item generation and reduction, construction, pilot testing, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yun, Young Ho, Kang, Eun Kyo, Lee, Jihye, Choo, Jiyeon, Ryu, Hyewon, Yun, Hye-min, Kang, Jung Hun, Kim, Tae You, Sim, Jin-Ah, Kim, Yaeji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29506514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0296-2
_version_ 1783303949540917248
author Yun, Young Ho
Kang, Eun Kyo
Lee, Jihye
Choo, Jiyeon
Ryu, Hyewon
Yun, Hye-min
Kang, Jung Hun
Kim, Tae You
Sim, Jin-Ah
Kim, Yaeji
author_facet Yun, Young Ho
Kang, Eun Kyo
Lee, Jihye
Choo, Jiyeon
Ryu, Hyewon
Yun, Hye-min
Kang, Jung Hun
Kim, Tae You
Sim, Jin-Ah
Kim, Yaeji
author_sort Yun, Young Ho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to develop and validate an instrument that could be used by patients with cancer to evaluate their quality of palliative care. METHODS: Development of the questionnaire followed the four-phase process: item generation and reduction, construction, pilot testing, and field testing. Based on the literature, we constructed a list of items for the quality of palliative care from 104 quality care issues divided into 14 subscales. We constructed scales of 43 items that only the cancer patients were asked to answer. Using relevance and feasibility criteria and pilot testing, we developed a 44-item questionnaire. To assess the sensitivity and validity of the questionnaire, we recruited 220 patients over 18 years of age from three Korean hospitals. RESULTS: Factor analysis of the data and fit statistics process resulted in the 4-factor, 32-item Quality Care Questionnaire-Palliative Care (QCQ-PC), which covers appropriate communication with health care professionals (ten items), discussing value of life and goals of care (nine items), support and counseling for needs of holistic care (seven items), and accessibility and sustainability of care (six items). All subscales and total scores showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha range, 0.89 to 0.97). Multi-trait scaling analysis showed good convergent (0.568–0.995) and discriminant (0.472–0.869) validity. The correlation between the total and subscale scores of QCQ-PC and those of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL, MQOL, SAT-SF, and DCS was obtained. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the QCQ-PC can be adopted to assess the quality of care in patients with cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-018-0296-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5836356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58363562018-03-07 Development and validation of the quality care questionnaire –palliative care (QCQ-PC): patient-reported assessment of quality of palliative care Yun, Young Ho Kang, Eun Kyo Lee, Jihye Choo, Jiyeon Ryu, Hyewon Yun, Hye-min Kang, Jung Hun Kim, Tae You Sim, Jin-Ah Kim, Yaeji BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to develop and validate an instrument that could be used by patients with cancer to evaluate their quality of palliative care. METHODS: Development of the questionnaire followed the four-phase process: item generation and reduction, construction, pilot testing, and field testing. Based on the literature, we constructed a list of items for the quality of palliative care from 104 quality care issues divided into 14 subscales. We constructed scales of 43 items that only the cancer patients were asked to answer. Using relevance and feasibility criteria and pilot testing, we developed a 44-item questionnaire. To assess the sensitivity and validity of the questionnaire, we recruited 220 patients over 18 years of age from three Korean hospitals. RESULTS: Factor analysis of the data and fit statistics process resulted in the 4-factor, 32-item Quality Care Questionnaire-Palliative Care (QCQ-PC), which covers appropriate communication with health care professionals (ten items), discussing value of life and goals of care (nine items), support and counseling for needs of holistic care (seven items), and accessibility and sustainability of care (six items). All subscales and total scores showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha range, 0.89 to 0.97). Multi-trait scaling analysis showed good convergent (0.568–0.995) and discriminant (0.472–0.869) validity. The correlation between the total and subscale scores of QCQ-PC and those of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL, MQOL, SAT-SF, and DCS was obtained. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the QCQ-PC can be adopted to assess the quality of care in patients with cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-018-0296-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5836356/ /pubmed/29506514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0296-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yun, Young Ho
Kang, Eun Kyo
Lee, Jihye
Choo, Jiyeon
Ryu, Hyewon
Yun, Hye-min
Kang, Jung Hun
Kim, Tae You
Sim, Jin-Ah
Kim, Yaeji
Development and validation of the quality care questionnaire –palliative care (QCQ-PC): patient-reported assessment of quality of palliative care
title Development and validation of the quality care questionnaire –palliative care (QCQ-PC): patient-reported assessment of quality of palliative care
title_full Development and validation of the quality care questionnaire –palliative care (QCQ-PC): patient-reported assessment of quality of palliative care
title_fullStr Development and validation of the quality care questionnaire –palliative care (QCQ-PC): patient-reported assessment of quality of palliative care
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the quality care questionnaire –palliative care (QCQ-PC): patient-reported assessment of quality of palliative care
title_short Development and validation of the quality care questionnaire –palliative care (QCQ-PC): patient-reported assessment of quality of palliative care
title_sort development and validation of the quality care questionnaire –palliative care (qcq-pc): patient-reported assessment of quality of palliative care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29506514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0296-2
work_keys_str_mv AT yunyoungho developmentandvalidationofthequalitycarequestionnairepalliativecareqcqpcpatientreportedassessmentofqualityofpalliativecare
AT kangeunkyo developmentandvalidationofthequalitycarequestionnairepalliativecareqcqpcpatientreportedassessmentofqualityofpalliativecare
AT leejihye developmentandvalidationofthequalitycarequestionnairepalliativecareqcqpcpatientreportedassessmentofqualityofpalliativecare
AT choojiyeon developmentandvalidationofthequalitycarequestionnairepalliativecareqcqpcpatientreportedassessmentofqualityofpalliativecare
AT ryuhyewon developmentandvalidationofthequalitycarequestionnairepalliativecareqcqpcpatientreportedassessmentofqualityofpalliativecare
AT yunhyemin developmentandvalidationofthequalitycarequestionnairepalliativecareqcqpcpatientreportedassessmentofqualityofpalliativecare
AT kangjunghun developmentandvalidationofthequalitycarequestionnairepalliativecareqcqpcpatientreportedassessmentofqualityofpalliativecare
AT kimtaeyou developmentandvalidationofthequalitycarequestionnairepalliativecareqcqpcpatientreportedassessmentofqualityofpalliativecare
AT simjinah developmentandvalidationofthequalitycarequestionnairepalliativecareqcqpcpatientreportedassessmentofqualityofpalliativecare
AT kimyaeji developmentandvalidationofthequalitycarequestionnairepalliativecareqcqpcpatientreportedassessmentofqualityofpalliativecare