Cargando…
High-flow nasal oxygen vs. standard oxygen therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the leading reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in immunocompromised patients. High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy is an alternative to standard oxygen. By providing warmed and humidified gas, HFNO allows the delivery of higher flow rates v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29506579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2492-z |
_version_ | 1783303955376242688 |
---|---|
author | Azoulay, Elie Lemiale, Virginie Mokart, Djamel Nseir, Saad Argaud, Laurent Pène, Frédéric Kontar, Loay Bruneel, Fabrice Klouche, Kada Barbier, François Reignier, Jean Stoclin, Anabelle Louis, Guillaume Constantin, Jean-Michel Mayaux, Julien Wallet, Florent Kouatchet, Achille Peigne, Vincent Perez, Pierre Girault, Christophe Jaber, Samir Oziel, Johanna Nyunga, Martine Terzi, Nicolas Bouadma, Lila Lebert, Christine Lautrette, Alexandre Bigé, Naike Raphalen, Jean-Herlé Papazian, Laurent Rabbat, Antoine Darmon, Michael Chevret, Sylvie Demoule, Alexandre |
author_facet | Azoulay, Elie Lemiale, Virginie Mokart, Djamel Nseir, Saad Argaud, Laurent Pène, Frédéric Kontar, Loay Bruneel, Fabrice Klouche, Kada Barbier, François Reignier, Jean Stoclin, Anabelle Louis, Guillaume Constantin, Jean-Michel Mayaux, Julien Wallet, Florent Kouatchet, Achille Peigne, Vincent Perez, Pierre Girault, Christophe Jaber, Samir Oziel, Johanna Nyunga, Martine Terzi, Nicolas Bouadma, Lila Lebert, Christine Lautrette, Alexandre Bigé, Naike Raphalen, Jean-Herlé Papazian, Laurent Rabbat, Antoine Darmon, Michael Chevret, Sylvie Demoule, Alexandre |
author_sort | Azoulay, Elie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the leading reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in immunocompromised patients. High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy is an alternative to standard oxygen. By providing warmed and humidified gas, HFNO allows the delivery of higher flow rates via nasal cannula devices, with FiO(2) values of nearly 100%. Benefits include alleviation of dyspnea and discomfort, decreased respiratory distress and decreased mortality in unselected patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. However, in preliminary reports, HFNO benefits are controversial in immunocompromised patients in whom it has never been properly evaluated. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial in 30 intensive care units, part of the Groupe de Recherche Respiratoire en Réanimation Onco-Hématologique (GRRR-OH). Inclusion criteria will be: (1) adults, (2) known immunosuppression, (3) ARF, (4) oxygen therapy ≥ 6 L/min, (5) written informed consent from patient or proxy. Exclusion criteria will be: (1) imminent death (moribund patient), (2) no informed consent, (3) hypercapnia (PaCO(2) ≥ 50 mmHg), (4) isolated cardiogenic pulmonary edema, (5) pregnancy or breastfeeding, (6) anatomical factors precluding insertion of a nasal cannula, (7) no coverage by the French statutory healthcare insurance system, and (8) post-surgical setting from day 1 to day 6 (patients with ARF occurring after day 6 of surgery can be included). The primary outcome measure is day-28 mortality. Secondary outcomes are intubation rate, comfort, dyspnea, respiratory rate, oxygenation, ICU length of stay, and ICU-acquired infections. Based on an expected 30% mortality rate in the standard oxygen group, and 20% in the HFNO group, error rate set at 5%, and a statistical power at 90%, 389 patients are required in each treatment group (778 patients overall). Recruitment period is estimated at 30 months, with 28 days of additional follow-up for the last included patient. DISCUSSION: The HIGH study will be the largest multicenter, randomized controlled trial seeking to demonstrate that survival benefits from HFNO reported in unselected patients also apply to a large immunocompromised population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02739451. Registered on 15 April 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2492-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5836389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58363892018-03-07 High-flow nasal oxygen vs. standard oxygen therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Azoulay, Elie Lemiale, Virginie Mokart, Djamel Nseir, Saad Argaud, Laurent Pène, Frédéric Kontar, Loay Bruneel, Fabrice Klouche, Kada Barbier, François Reignier, Jean Stoclin, Anabelle Louis, Guillaume Constantin, Jean-Michel Mayaux, Julien Wallet, Florent Kouatchet, Achille Peigne, Vincent Perez, Pierre Girault, Christophe Jaber, Samir Oziel, Johanna Nyunga, Martine Terzi, Nicolas Bouadma, Lila Lebert, Christine Lautrette, Alexandre Bigé, Naike Raphalen, Jean-Herlé Papazian, Laurent Rabbat, Antoine Darmon, Michael Chevret, Sylvie Demoule, Alexandre Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the leading reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in immunocompromised patients. High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy is an alternative to standard oxygen. By providing warmed and humidified gas, HFNO allows the delivery of higher flow rates via nasal cannula devices, with FiO(2) values of nearly 100%. Benefits include alleviation of dyspnea and discomfort, decreased respiratory distress and decreased mortality in unselected patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. However, in preliminary reports, HFNO benefits are controversial in immunocompromised patients in whom it has never been properly evaluated. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial in 30 intensive care units, part of the Groupe de Recherche Respiratoire en Réanimation Onco-Hématologique (GRRR-OH). Inclusion criteria will be: (1) adults, (2) known immunosuppression, (3) ARF, (4) oxygen therapy ≥ 6 L/min, (5) written informed consent from patient or proxy. Exclusion criteria will be: (1) imminent death (moribund patient), (2) no informed consent, (3) hypercapnia (PaCO(2) ≥ 50 mmHg), (4) isolated cardiogenic pulmonary edema, (5) pregnancy or breastfeeding, (6) anatomical factors precluding insertion of a nasal cannula, (7) no coverage by the French statutory healthcare insurance system, and (8) post-surgical setting from day 1 to day 6 (patients with ARF occurring after day 6 of surgery can be included). The primary outcome measure is day-28 mortality. Secondary outcomes are intubation rate, comfort, dyspnea, respiratory rate, oxygenation, ICU length of stay, and ICU-acquired infections. Based on an expected 30% mortality rate in the standard oxygen group, and 20% in the HFNO group, error rate set at 5%, and a statistical power at 90%, 389 patients are required in each treatment group (778 patients overall). Recruitment period is estimated at 30 months, with 28 days of additional follow-up for the last included patient. DISCUSSION: The HIGH study will be the largest multicenter, randomized controlled trial seeking to demonstrate that survival benefits from HFNO reported in unselected patients also apply to a large immunocompromised population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02739451. Registered on 15 April 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2492-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5836389/ /pubmed/29506579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2492-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Azoulay, Elie Lemiale, Virginie Mokart, Djamel Nseir, Saad Argaud, Laurent Pène, Frédéric Kontar, Loay Bruneel, Fabrice Klouche, Kada Barbier, François Reignier, Jean Stoclin, Anabelle Louis, Guillaume Constantin, Jean-Michel Mayaux, Julien Wallet, Florent Kouatchet, Achille Peigne, Vincent Perez, Pierre Girault, Christophe Jaber, Samir Oziel, Johanna Nyunga, Martine Terzi, Nicolas Bouadma, Lila Lebert, Christine Lautrette, Alexandre Bigé, Naike Raphalen, Jean-Herlé Papazian, Laurent Rabbat, Antoine Darmon, Michael Chevret, Sylvie Demoule, Alexandre High-flow nasal oxygen vs. standard oxygen therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | High-flow nasal oxygen vs. standard oxygen therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | High-flow nasal oxygen vs. standard oxygen therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | High-flow nasal oxygen vs. standard oxygen therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | High-flow nasal oxygen vs. standard oxygen therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | High-flow nasal oxygen vs. standard oxygen therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | high-flow nasal oxygen vs. standard oxygen therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29506579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2492-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT azoulayelie highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lemialevirginie highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mokartdjamel highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nseirsaad highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT argaudlaurent highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT penefrederic highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kontarloay highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bruneelfabrice highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT klouchekada highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT barbierfrancois highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT reignierjean highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stoclinanabelle highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT louisguillaume highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT constantinjeanmichel highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mayauxjulien highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT walletflorent highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kouatchetachille highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT peignevincent highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT perezpierre highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT giraultchristophe highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jabersamir highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ozieljohanna highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nyungamartine highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT terzinicolas highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bouadmalila highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lebertchristine highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lautrettealexandre highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bigenaike highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT raphalenjeanherle highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT papazianlaurent highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rabbatantoine highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT darmonmichael highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chevretsylvie highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT demoulealexandre highflownasaloxygenvsstandardoxygentherapyinimmunocompromisedpatientswithacuterespiratoryfailurestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |