Cargando…

Effects of resistant maltodextrin on bowel movements: a systematic review and meta-analysis

It is well known that dietary fiber helps to relieve and prevent constipation, and there are a number of scientific papers, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effects of naturally derived dietary fiber on bowel movements. In recent years, there has been an increase in the manufact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watanabe, Norikazu, Suzuki, Masataka, Yamaguchi, Yoshitake, Egashira, Yukari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535547
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S153924
_version_ 1783303994013122560
author Watanabe, Norikazu
Suzuki, Masataka
Yamaguchi, Yoshitake
Egashira, Yukari
author_facet Watanabe, Norikazu
Suzuki, Masataka
Yamaguchi, Yoshitake
Egashira, Yukari
author_sort Watanabe, Norikazu
collection PubMed
description It is well known that dietary fiber helps to relieve and prevent constipation, and there are a number of scientific papers, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effects of naturally derived dietary fiber on bowel movements. In recent years, there has been an increase in the manufacture of dietary fiber ingredients obtained from food raw materials, and these are now commonly available in the market. Resistant maltodextrin (RMD), a soluble dietary fiber, is manufactured from starch, and industrially produced soluble dietary fiber is used worldwide. While there are many reports on the effects of RMD on bowel movements, no systematic review or meta-analysis has been reported. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the effect of RMD on bowel movements based on stool frequency and stool volume. We also investigated the subjective evaluation of RMD effects on bowel movements. Of a total of 314 potentially relevant articles, 28 articles met the eligibility criteria, and 29 randomized controlled trials were identified. As a result of integration analyses, we found that the intake of RMD significantly increased stool volume and stool frequency compared with placebo intake. Furthermore, RMD intake tended to improve sensation of complete/incomplete evacuation. In conclusion, the evidence suggests that RMD has a positive effect on bowel movements, contributing to normal bowel function. This finding will help in the development of new criteria for choice of dietary fiber in the process of developing food products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5836649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58366492018-03-13 Effects of resistant maltodextrin on bowel movements: a systematic review and meta-analysis Watanabe, Norikazu Suzuki, Masataka Yamaguchi, Yoshitake Egashira, Yukari Clin Exp Gastroenterol Review It is well known that dietary fiber helps to relieve and prevent constipation, and there are a number of scientific papers, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effects of naturally derived dietary fiber on bowel movements. In recent years, there has been an increase in the manufacture of dietary fiber ingredients obtained from food raw materials, and these are now commonly available in the market. Resistant maltodextrin (RMD), a soluble dietary fiber, is manufactured from starch, and industrially produced soluble dietary fiber is used worldwide. While there are many reports on the effects of RMD on bowel movements, no systematic review or meta-analysis has been reported. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the effect of RMD on bowel movements based on stool frequency and stool volume. We also investigated the subjective evaluation of RMD effects on bowel movements. Of a total of 314 potentially relevant articles, 28 articles met the eligibility criteria, and 29 randomized controlled trials were identified. As a result of integration analyses, we found that the intake of RMD significantly increased stool volume and stool frequency compared with placebo intake. Furthermore, RMD intake tended to improve sensation of complete/incomplete evacuation. In conclusion, the evidence suggests that RMD has a positive effect on bowel movements, contributing to normal bowel function. This finding will help in the development of new criteria for choice of dietary fiber in the process of developing food products. Dove Medical Press 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5836649/ /pubmed/29535547 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S153924 Text en © 2018 Watanabe et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Watanabe, Norikazu
Suzuki, Masataka
Yamaguchi, Yoshitake
Egashira, Yukari
Effects of resistant maltodextrin on bowel movements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effects of resistant maltodextrin on bowel movements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effects of resistant maltodextrin on bowel movements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effects of resistant maltodextrin on bowel movements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of resistant maltodextrin on bowel movements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effects of resistant maltodextrin on bowel movements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effects of resistant maltodextrin on bowel movements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535547
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S153924
work_keys_str_mv AT watanabenorikazu effectsofresistantmaltodextrinonbowelmovementsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT suzukimasataka effectsofresistantmaltodextrinonbowelmovementsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yamaguchiyoshitake effectsofresistantmaltodextrinonbowelmovementsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT egashirayukari effectsofresistantmaltodextrinonbowelmovementsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis