Cargando…

Clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: analysis from five countries

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported on the incidence of sedation-related adverse events (AEs), but little is known about their impact on health care costs and resource use. METHODS: Health care providers and payers in five countries were recruited for an online survey by independent administrators to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saunders, Rhodri, Davis, Jason A, Kranke, Peter, Weissbrod, Rachel, Whitaker, David K, Lightdale, Jenifer R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535525
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S154720
_version_ 1783303996650291200
author Saunders, Rhodri
Davis, Jason A
Kranke, Peter
Weissbrod, Rachel
Whitaker, David K
Lightdale, Jenifer R
author_facet Saunders, Rhodri
Davis, Jason A
Kranke, Peter
Weissbrod, Rachel
Whitaker, David K
Lightdale, Jenifer R
author_sort Saunders, Rhodri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies have reported on the incidence of sedation-related adverse events (AEs), but little is known about their impact on health care costs and resource use. METHODS: Health care providers and payers in five countries were recruited for an online survey by independent administrators to ensure that investigators and respondents were blinded to each other. Surveys were conducted in the local language and began with a “screener” to ensure that respondents had relevant expertise and experience. Responses were analyzed using Excel and R, with the Dixon’s Q statistic used to identify and remove outliers. Global and country-specific average treatment patterns were calculated via bootstrapping; costs were mean values. The sum product of costs and intervention probability gave a cost per AE. RESULTS: Responses were received from 101 providers and 26 payers, the majority having >5 years of experience. At a minimum, the respondents performed a total of 3,430 procedural sedations per month. All AEs detailed occurred in clinical practice in the last year and were reported to cause procedural delays and cancellations in some patients. Standard procedural sedation costs ranged from €74 (Germany) to $2,300 (US). Respondents estimated that AEs would increase costs by between 16% (Italy) and 179% (US). Hypotension was reported as the most commonly observed AE with an associated global mean cost (interquartile range) of $43 ($27–$68). Other frequent AEs, including mild hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia, mild oxygen desaturation, hypertension, and brief apnea, were estimated to increase health care spending on procedural sedation by $2.2 billion annually in the US. CONCLUSION: All sedation-related AEs can increase health care costs and result in substantial delays or cancellations of subsequent procedures. The prevention of even minor AEs during procedural sedation may be crucial to ensuring its value as a health care service.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5836671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58366712018-03-13 Clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: analysis from five countries Saunders, Rhodri Davis, Jason A Kranke, Peter Weissbrod, Rachel Whitaker, David K Lightdale, Jenifer R Ther Clin Risk Manag Original Research BACKGROUND: Studies have reported on the incidence of sedation-related adverse events (AEs), but little is known about their impact on health care costs and resource use. METHODS: Health care providers and payers in five countries were recruited for an online survey by independent administrators to ensure that investigators and respondents were blinded to each other. Surveys were conducted in the local language and began with a “screener” to ensure that respondents had relevant expertise and experience. Responses were analyzed using Excel and R, with the Dixon’s Q statistic used to identify and remove outliers. Global and country-specific average treatment patterns were calculated via bootstrapping; costs were mean values. The sum product of costs and intervention probability gave a cost per AE. RESULTS: Responses were received from 101 providers and 26 payers, the majority having >5 years of experience. At a minimum, the respondents performed a total of 3,430 procedural sedations per month. All AEs detailed occurred in clinical practice in the last year and were reported to cause procedural delays and cancellations in some patients. Standard procedural sedation costs ranged from €74 (Germany) to $2,300 (US). Respondents estimated that AEs would increase costs by between 16% (Italy) and 179% (US). Hypotension was reported as the most commonly observed AE with an associated global mean cost (interquartile range) of $43 ($27–$68). Other frequent AEs, including mild hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia, mild oxygen desaturation, hypertension, and brief apnea, were estimated to increase health care spending on procedural sedation by $2.2 billion annually in the US. CONCLUSION: All sedation-related AEs can increase health care costs and result in substantial delays or cancellations of subsequent procedures. The prevention of even minor AEs during procedural sedation may be crucial to ensuring its value as a health care service. Dove Medical Press 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5836671/ /pubmed/29535525 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S154720 Text en © 2018 Saunders et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Saunders, Rhodri
Davis, Jason A
Kranke, Peter
Weissbrod, Rachel
Whitaker, David K
Lightdale, Jenifer R
Clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: analysis from five countries
title Clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: analysis from five countries
title_full Clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: analysis from five countries
title_fullStr Clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: analysis from five countries
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: analysis from five countries
title_short Clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: analysis from five countries
title_sort clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: analysis from five countries
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29535525
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S154720
work_keys_str_mv AT saundersrhodri clinicalandeconomicburdenofproceduralsedationrelatedadverseeventsandtheiroutcomesanalysisfromfivecountries
AT davisjasona clinicalandeconomicburdenofproceduralsedationrelatedadverseeventsandtheiroutcomesanalysisfromfivecountries
AT krankepeter clinicalandeconomicburdenofproceduralsedationrelatedadverseeventsandtheiroutcomesanalysisfromfivecountries
AT weissbrodrachel clinicalandeconomicburdenofproceduralsedationrelatedadverseeventsandtheiroutcomesanalysisfromfivecountries
AT whitakerdavidk clinicalandeconomicburdenofproceduralsedationrelatedadverseeventsandtheiroutcomesanalysisfromfivecountries
AT lightdalejeniferr clinicalandeconomicburdenofproceduralsedationrelatedadverseeventsandtheiroutcomesanalysisfromfivecountries