Cargando…

Using host species traits to understand the consequences of resource provisioning for host–parasite interactions

1. Supplemental food provided to wildlife by human activities can be more abundant and predictable than natural resources, and subsequent changes in wildlife ecology can have profound impacts on host–parasite interactions. Identifying traits of species associated with increases or decreases in infec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becker, Daniel J., Streicker, Daniel G., Altizer, Sonia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29023699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12765
_version_ 1783304030602133504
author Becker, Daniel J.
Streicker, Daniel G.
Altizer, Sonia
author_facet Becker, Daniel J.
Streicker, Daniel G.
Altizer, Sonia
author_sort Becker, Daniel J.
collection PubMed
description 1. Supplemental food provided to wildlife by human activities can be more abundant and predictable than natural resources, and subsequent changes in wildlife ecology can have profound impacts on host–parasite interactions. Identifying traits of species associated with increases or decreases in infection outcomes with resource provisioning could improve assessments of wildlife most prone to disease risks in changing environments. 2. We conducted a phylogenetic meta‐analysis of 342 host–parasite interactions across 56 wildlife species and three broad taxonomic groups of parasites to identify host‐level traits that influence whether provisioning is associated with increases or decreases in infection. 3. We predicted dietary generalists that capitalize on novel food would show greater infection in provisioned habitats owing to population growth and food‐borne exposure to contaminants and parasite infectious stages. Similarly, species with fast life histories could experience stronger demographic and immunological benefits from provisioning that affect parasite transmission. We also predicted that wide‐ranging and migratory behaviours could increase infection risks with provisioning if concentrated and non‐seasonal foods promote dense aggregations that increase exposure to parasites. 4. We found that provisioning increased infection with bacteria, viruses, fungi and protozoa (i.e. microparasites) most for wide‐ranging, dietary generalist host species. Effect sizes for ectoparasites were also highest for host species with large home ranges but were instead lowest for dietary generalists. In contrast, the type of provisioning was a stronger correlate of infection outcomes for helminths than host species traits. 5. Our analysis highlights host traits related to movement and feeding behaviour as important determinants of whether species experience greater infection with supplemental feeding. These results could help prioritize monitoring wildlife with particular trait profiles in anthropogenic habitats to reduce infectious disease risks in provisioned populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5836909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58369092018-03-12 Using host species traits to understand the consequences of resource provisioning for host–parasite interactions Becker, Daniel J. Streicker, Daniel G. Altizer, Sonia J Anim Ecol Special Feature: Animal host–microbe interactions 1. Supplemental food provided to wildlife by human activities can be more abundant and predictable than natural resources, and subsequent changes in wildlife ecology can have profound impacts on host–parasite interactions. Identifying traits of species associated with increases or decreases in infection outcomes with resource provisioning could improve assessments of wildlife most prone to disease risks in changing environments. 2. We conducted a phylogenetic meta‐analysis of 342 host–parasite interactions across 56 wildlife species and three broad taxonomic groups of parasites to identify host‐level traits that influence whether provisioning is associated with increases or decreases in infection. 3. We predicted dietary generalists that capitalize on novel food would show greater infection in provisioned habitats owing to population growth and food‐borne exposure to contaminants and parasite infectious stages. Similarly, species with fast life histories could experience stronger demographic and immunological benefits from provisioning that affect parasite transmission. We also predicted that wide‐ranging and migratory behaviours could increase infection risks with provisioning if concentrated and non‐seasonal foods promote dense aggregations that increase exposure to parasites. 4. We found that provisioning increased infection with bacteria, viruses, fungi and protozoa (i.e. microparasites) most for wide‐ranging, dietary generalist host species. Effect sizes for ectoparasites were also highest for host species with large home ranges but were instead lowest for dietary generalists. In contrast, the type of provisioning was a stronger correlate of infection outcomes for helminths than host species traits. 5. Our analysis highlights host traits related to movement and feeding behaviour as important determinants of whether species experience greater infection with supplemental feeding. These results could help prioritize monitoring wildlife with particular trait profiles in anthropogenic habitats to reduce infectious disease risks in provisioned populations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-13 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5836909/ /pubmed/29023699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12765 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Feature: Animal host–microbe interactions
Becker, Daniel J.
Streicker, Daniel G.
Altizer, Sonia
Using host species traits to understand the consequences of resource provisioning for host–parasite interactions
title Using host species traits to understand the consequences of resource provisioning for host–parasite interactions
title_full Using host species traits to understand the consequences of resource provisioning for host–parasite interactions
title_fullStr Using host species traits to understand the consequences of resource provisioning for host–parasite interactions
title_full_unstemmed Using host species traits to understand the consequences of resource provisioning for host–parasite interactions
title_short Using host species traits to understand the consequences of resource provisioning for host–parasite interactions
title_sort using host species traits to understand the consequences of resource provisioning for host–parasite interactions
topic Special Feature: Animal host–microbe interactions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29023699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12765
work_keys_str_mv AT beckerdanielj usinghostspeciestraitstounderstandtheconsequencesofresourceprovisioningforhostparasiteinteractions
AT streickerdanielg usinghostspeciestraitstounderstandtheconsequencesofresourceprovisioningforhostparasiteinteractions
AT altizersonia usinghostspeciestraitstounderstandtheconsequencesofresourceprovisioningforhostparasiteinteractions