Cargando…

Recurrence of uterine myoma after myomectomy: Open myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy

AIM: Open myomectomy (OM) was previously frequently performed; however, laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) has recently become more common. Nevertheless, myoma can recur after both LM and OM. In this study, we report our retrospective investigation of myoma recurrence by comparing LM and OM. METHODS: A to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotani, Yasushi, Tobiume, Takako, Fujishima, Risa, Shigeta, Mamoru, Takaya, Hisamitsu, Nakai, Hidekatsu, Suzuki, Ayako, Tsuji, Isao, Mandai, Masaki, Matsumura, Noriomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29227004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.13519
_version_ 1783304039617789952
author Kotani, Yasushi
Tobiume, Takako
Fujishima, Risa
Shigeta, Mamoru
Takaya, Hisamitsu
Nakai, Hidekatsu
Suzuki, Ayako
Tsuji, Isao
Mandai, Masaki
Matsumura, Noriomi
author_facet Kotani, Yasushi
Tobiume, Takako
Fujishima, Risa
Shigeta, Mamoru
Takaya, Hisamitsu
Nakai, Hidekatsu
Suzuki, Ayako
Tsuji, Isao
Mandai, Masaki
Matsumura, Noriomi
author_sort Kotani, Yasushi
collection PubMed
description AIM: Open myomectomy (OM) was previously frequently performed; however, laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) has recently become more common. Nevertheless, myoma can recur after both LM and OM. In this study, we report our retrospective investigation of myoma recurrence by comparing LM and OM. METHODS: A total of 474 patients underwent LM and 279 patients underwent OM. The patients were followed‐up postoperatively from six months to eight years. Recurrence was confirmed when a myoma with a diameter of ≥ 1 cm was detected. Post‐LM, post‐OM and cumulative recurrence rates were investigated, and a Cox hazard test was performed. RESULTS: The cumulative recurrence rates between the two groups were 76.2% (LM) vs. 63.4% (OM) at eight years postoperatively. A log‐rank test revealed a significant difference between the two groups. Cox hazard testing revealed that LM, a larger number of enucleated myoma masses and the absence of postoperative gestation significantly contributed to the postoperative recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: LM yielded a higher recurrence rate than OM, likely a result of manual myoma removal in OM, which is a more exhaustive extraction of smaller myoma masses than performed in LM. In other words, fewer residual myoma masses after OM contribute to a lower postoperative recurrence rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5836951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58369512018-03-12 Recurrence of uterine myoma after myomectomy: Open myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy Kotani, Yasushi Tobiume, Takako Fujishima, Risa Shigeta, Mamoru Takaya, Hisamitsu Nakai, Hidekatsu Suzuki, Ayako Tsuji, Isao Mandai, Masaki Matsumura, Noriomi J Obstet Gynaecol Res Original Articles AIM: Open myomectomy (OM) was previously frequently performed; however, laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) has recently become more common. Nevertheless, myoma can recur after both LM and OM. In this study, we report our retrospective investigation of myoma recurrence by comparing LM and OM. METHODS: A total of 474 patients underwent LM and 279 patients underwent OM. The patients were followed‐up postoperatively from six months to eight years. Recurrence was confirmed when a myoma with a diameter of ≥ 1 cm was detected. Post‐LM, post‐OM and cumulative recurrence rates were investigated, and a Cox hazard test was performed. RESULTS: The cumulative recurrence rates between the two groups were 76.2% (LM) vs. 63.4% (OM) at eight years postoperatively. A log‐rank test revealed a significant difference between the two groups. Cox hazard testing revealed that LM, a larger number of enucleated myoma masses and the absence of postoperative gestation significantly contributed to the postoperative recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: LM yielded a higher recurrence rate than OM, likely a result of manual myoma removal in OM, which is a more exhaustive extraction of smaller myoma masses than performed in LM. In other words, fewer residual myoma masses after OM contribute to a lower postoperative recurrence rate. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2017-12-11 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5836951/ /pubmed/29227004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.13519 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kotani, Yasushi
Tobiume, Takako
Fujishima, Risa
Shigeta, Mamoru
Takaya, Hisamitsu
Nakai, Hidekatsu
Suzuki, Ayako
Tsuji, Isao
Mandai, Masaki
Matsumura, Noriomi
Recurrence of uterine myoma after myomectomy: Open myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy
title Recurrence of uterine myoma after myomectomy: Open myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy
title_full Recurrence of uterine myoma after myomectomy: Open myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy
title_fullStr Recurrence of uterine myoma after myomectomy: Open myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy
title_full_unstemmed Recurrence of uterine myoma after myomectomy: Open myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy
title_short Recurrence of uterine myoma after myomectomy: Open myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy
title_sort recurrence of uterine myoma after myomectomy: open myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29227004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.13519
work_keys_str_mv AT kotaniyasushi recurrenceofuterinemyomaaftermyomectomyopenmyomectomyversuslaparoscopicmyomectomy
AT tobiumetakako recurrenceofuterinemyomaaftermyomectomyopenmyomectomyversuslaparoscopicmyomectomy
AT fujishimarisa recurrenceofuterinemyomaaftermyomectomyopenmyomectomyversuslaparoscopicmyomectomy
AT shigetamamoru recurrenceofuterinemyomaaftermyomectomyopenmyomectomyversuslaparoscopicmyomectomy
AT takayahisamitsu recurrenceofuterinemyomaaftermyomectomyopenmyomectomyversuslaparoscopicmyomectomy
AT nakaihidekatsu recurrenceofuterinemyomaaftermyomectomyopenmyomectomyversuslaparoscopicmyomectomy
AT suzukiayako recurrenceofuterinemyomaaftermyomectomyopenmyomectomyversuslaparoscopicmyomectomy
AT tsujiisao recurrenceofuterinemyomaaftermyomectomyopenmyomectomyversuslaparoscopicmyomectomy
AT mandaimasaki recurrenceofuterinemyomaaftermyomectomyopenmyomectomyversuslaparoscopicmyomectomy
AT matsumuranoriomi recurrenceofuterinemyomaaftermyomectomyopenmyomectomyversuslaparoscopicmyomectomy