Cargando…

Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study

Background: Previous studies have suggested that modern obesogenic environments accentuate the genetic risk of obesity. However, these studies have proven controversial as to which, if any, measures of the environment accentuate genetic susceptibility to high body mass index (BMI). Methods: We used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tyrrell, Jessica, Wood, Andrew R, Ames, Ryan M, Yaghootkar, Hanieh, Beaumont, Robin N, Jones, Samuel E, Tuke, Marcus A, Ruth, Katherine S, Freathy, Rachel M, Davey Smith, George, Joost, Stéphane, Guessous, Idris, Murray, Anna, Strachan, David P, Kutalik, Zoltán, Weedon, Michael N, Frayling, Timothy M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5837271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28073954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw337
_version_ 1783304086751281152
author Tyrrell, Jessica
Wood, Andrew R
Ames, Ryan M
Yaghootkar, Hanieh
Beaumont, Robin N
Jones, Samuel E
Tuke, Marcus A
Ruth, Katherine S
Freathy, Rachel M
Davey Smith, George
Joost, Stéphane
Guessous, Idris
Murray, Anna
Strachan, David P
Kutalik, Zoltán
Weedon, Michael N
Frayling, Timothy M
author_facet Tyrrell, Jessica
Wood, Andrew R
Ames, Ryan M
Yaghootkar, Hanieh
Beaumont, Robin N
Jones, Samuel E
Tuke, Marcus A
Ruth, Katherine S
Freathy, Rachel M
Davey Smith, George
Joost, Stéphane
Guessous, Idris
Murray, Anna
Strachan, David P
Kutalik, Zoltán
Weedon, Michael N
Frayling, Timothy M
author_sort Tyrrell, Jessica
collection PubMed
description Background: Previous studies have suggested that modern obesogenic environments accentuate the genetic risk of obesity. However, these studies have proven controversial as to which, if any, measures of the environment accentuate genetic susceptibility to high body mass index (BMI). Methods: We used up to 120 000 adults from the UK Biobank study to test the hypothesis that high-risk obesogenic environments and behaviours accentuate genetic susceptibility to obesity. We used BMI as the outcome and a 69-variant genetic risk score (GRS) for obesity and 12 measures of the obesogenic environment as exposures. These measures included Townsend deprivation index (TDI) as a measure of socio-economic position, TV watching, a ‘Westernized’ diet and physical activity. We performed several negative control tests, including randomly selecting groups of different average BMIs, using a simulated environment and including sun-protection use as an environment. Results: We found gene–environment interactions with TDI (Pinteraction = 3 × 10(–10)), self-reported TV watching (Pinteraction = 7 × 10(–5)) and self-reported physical activity (Pinteraction = 5 × 10(–6)). Within the group of 50% living in the most relatively deprived situations, carrying 10 additional BMI-raising alleles was associated with approximately 3.8 kg extra weight in someone 1.73 m tall. In contrast, within the group of 50% living in the least deprivation, carrying 10 additional BMI-raising alleles was associated with approximately 2.9 kg extra weight. The interactions were weaker, but present, with the negative controls, including sun-protection use, indicating that residual confounding is likely. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the obesogenic environment accentuates the risk of obesity in genetically susceptible adults. Of the factors we tested, relative social deprivation best captures the aspects of the obesogenic environment responsible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5837271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58372712018-03-09 Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study Tyrrell, Jessica Wood, Andrew R Ames, Ryan M Yaghootkar, Hanieh Beaumont, Robin N Jones, Samuel E Tuke, Marcus A Ruth, Katherine S Freathy, Rachel M Davey Smith, George Joost, Stéphane Guessous, Idris Murray, Anna Strachan, David P Kutalik, Zoltán Weedon, Michael N Frayling, Timothy M Int J Epidemiol Obesogenic Risks Background: Previous studies have suggested that modern obesogenic environments accentuate the genetic risk of obesity. However, these studies have proven controversial as to which, if any, measures of the environment accentuate genetic susceptibility to high body mass index (BMI). Methods: We used up to 120 000 adults from the UK Biobank study to test the hypothesis that high-risk obesogenic environments and behaviours accentuate genetic susceptibility to obesity. We used BMI as the outcome and a 69-variant genetic risk score (GRS) for obesity and 12 measures of the obesogenic environment as exposures. These measures included Townsend deprivation index (TDI) as a measure of socio-economic position, TV watching, a ‘Westernized’ diet and physical activity. We performed several negative control tests, including randomly selecting groups of different average BMIs, using a simulated environment and including sun-protection use as an environment. Results: We found gene–environment interactions with TDI (Pinteraction = 3 × 10(–10)), self-reported TV watching (Pinteraction = 7 × 10(–5)) and self-reported physical activity (Pinteraction = 5 × 10(–6)). Within the group of 50% living in the most relatively deprived situations, carrying 10 additional BMI-raising alleles was associated with approximately 3.8 kg extra weight in someone 1.73 m tall. In contrast, within the group of 50% living in the least deprivation, carrying 10 additional BMI-raising alleles was associated with approximately 2.9 kg extra weight. The interactions were weaker, but present, with the negative controls, including sun-protection use, indicating that residual confounding is likely. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the obesogenic environment accentuates the risk of obesity in genetically susceptible adults. Of the factors we tested, relative social deprivation best captures the aspects of the obesogenic environment responsible. Oxford University Press 2017-04 2017-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5837271/ /pubmed/28073954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw337 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Obesogenic Risks
Tyrrell, Jessica
Wood, Andrew R
Ames, Ryan M
Yaghootkar, Hanieh
Beaumont, Robin N
Jones, Samuel E
Tuke, Marcus A
Ruth, Katherine S
Freathy, Rachel M
Davey Smith, George
Joost, Stéphane
Guessous, Idris
Murray, Anna
Strachan, David P
Kutalik, Zoltán
Weedon, Michael N
Frayling, Timothy M
Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study
title Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study
title_full Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study
title_fullStr Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study
title_full_unstemmed Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study
title_short Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study
title_sort gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the uk biobank study
topic Obesogenic Risks
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5837271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28073954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw337
work_keys_str_mv AT tyrrelljessica geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT woodandrewr geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT amesryanm geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT yaghootkarhanieh geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT beaumontrobinn geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT jonessamuele geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT tukemarcusa geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT ruthkatherines geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT freathyrachelm geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT daveysmithgeorge geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT jooststephane geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT guessousidris geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT murrayanna geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT strachandavidp geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT kutalikzoltan geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT weedonmichaeln geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy
AT fraylingtimothym geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy