Cargando…
Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study
Background: Previous studies have suggested that modern obesogenic environments accentuate the genetic risk of obesity. However, these studies have proven controversial as to which, if any, measures of the environment accentuate genetic susceptibility to high body mass index (BMI). Methods: We used...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5837271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28073954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw337 |
_version_ | 1783304086751281152 |
---|---|
author | Tyrrell, Jessica Wood, Andrew R Ames, Ryan M Yaghootkar, Hanieh Beaumont, Robin N Jones, Samuel E Tuke, Marcus A Ruth, Katherine S Freathy, Rachel M Davey Smith, George Joost, Stéphane Guessous, Idris Murray, Anna Strachan, David P Kutalik, Zoltán Weedon, Michael N Frayling, Timothy M |
author_facet | Tyrrell, Jessica Wood, Andrew R Ames, Ryan M Yaghootkar, Hanieh Beaumont, Robin N Jones, Samuel E Tuke, Marcus A Ruth, Katherine S Freathy, Rachel M Davey Smith, George Joost, Stéphane Guessous, Idris Murray, Anna Strachan, David P Kutalik, Zoltán Weedon, Michael N Frayling, Timothy M |
author_sort | Tyrrell, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Previous studies have suggested that modern obesogenic environments accentuate the genetic risk of obesity. However, these studies have proven controversial as to which, if any, measures of the environment accentuate genetic susceptibility to high body mass index (BMI). Methods: We used up to 120 000 adults from the UK Biobank study to test the hypothesis that high-risk obesogenic environments and behaviours accentuate genetic susceptibility to obesity. We used BMI as the outcome and a 69-variant genetic risk score (GRS) for obesity and 12 measures of the obesogenic environment as exposures. These measures included Townsend deprivation index (TDI) as a measure of socio-economic position, TV watching, a ‘Westernized’ diet and physical activity. We performed several negative control tests, including randomly selecting groups of different average BMIs, using a simulated environment and including sun-protection use as an environment. Results: We found gene–environment interactions with TDI (Pinteraction = 3 × 10(–10)), self-reported TV watching (Pinteraction = 7 × 10(–5)) and self-reported physical activity (Pinteraction = 5 × 10(–6)). Within the group of 50% living in the most relatively deprived situations, carrying 10 additional BMI-raising alleles was associated with approximately 3.8 kg extra weight in someone 1.73 m tall. In contrast, within the group of 50% living in the least deprivation, carrying 10 additional BMI-raising alleles was associated with approximately 2.9 kg extra weight. The interactions were weaker, but present, with the negative controls, including sun-protection use, indicating that residual confounding is likely. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the obesogenic environment accentuates the risk of obesity in genetically susceptible adults. Of the factors we tested, relative social deprivation best captures the aspects of the obesogenic environment responsible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5837271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58372712018-03-09 Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study Tyrrell, Jessica Wood, Andrew R Ames, Ryan M Yaghootkar, Hanieh Beaumont, Robin N Jones, Samuel E Tuke, Marcus A Ruth, Katherine S Freathy, Rachel M Davey Smith, George Joost, Stéphane Guessous, Idris Murray, Anna Strachan, David P Kutalik, Zoltán Weedon, Michael N Frayling, Timothy M Int J Epidemiol Obesogenic Risks Background: Previous studies have suggested that modern obesogenic environments accentuate the genetic risk of obesity. However, these studies have proven controversial as to which, if any, measures of the environment accentuate genetic susceptibility to high body mass index (BMI). Methods: We used up to 120 000 adults from the UK Biobank study to test the hypothesis that high-risk obesogenic environments and behaviours accentuate genetic susceptibility to obesity. We used BMI as the outcome and a 69-variant genetic risk score (GRS) for obesity and 12 measures of the obesogenic environment as exposures. These measures included Townsend deprivation index (TDI) as a measure of socio-economic position, TV watching, a ‘Westernized’ diet and physical activity. We performed several negative control tests, including randomly selecting groups of different average BMIs, using a simulated environment and including sun-protection use as an environment. Results: We found gene–environment interactions with TDI (Pinteraction = 3 × 10(–10)), self-reported TV watching (Pinteraction = 7 × 10(–5)) and self-reported physical activity (Pinteraction = 5 × 10(–6)). Within the group of 50% living in the most relatively deprived situations, carrying 10 additional BMI-raising alleles was associated with approximately 3.8 kg extra weight in someone 1.73 m tall. In contrast, within the group of 50% living in the least deprivation, carrying 10 additional BMI-raising alleles was associated with approximately 2.9 kg extra weight. The interactions were weaker, but present, with the negative controls, including sun-protection use, indicating that residual confounding is likely. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the obesogenic environment accentuates the risk of obesity in genetically susceptible adults. Of the factors we tested, relative social deprivation best captures the aspects of the obesogenic environment responsible. Oxford University Press 2017-04 2017-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5837271/ /pubmed/28073954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw337 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Obesogenic Risks Tyrrell, Jessica Wood, Andrew R Ames, Ryan M Yaghootkar, Hanieh Beaumont, Robin N Jones, Samuel E Tuke, Marcus A Ruth, Katherine S Freathy, Rachel M Davey Smith, George Joost, Stéphane Guessous, Idris Murray, Anna Strachan, David P Kutalik, Zoltán Weedon, Michael N Frayling, Timothy M Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study |
title | Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study |
title_full | Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study |
title_fullStr | Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study |
title_full_unstemmed | Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study |
title_short | Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study |
title_sort | gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the uk biobank study |
topic | Obesogenic Risks |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5837271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28073954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tyrrelljessica geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT woodandrewr geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT amesryanm geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT yaghootkarhanieh geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT beaumontrobinn geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT jonessamuele geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT tukemarcusa geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT ruthkatherines geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT freathyrachelm geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT daveysmithgeorge geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT jooststephane geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT guessousidris geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT murrayanna geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT strachandavidp geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT kutalikzoltan geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT weedonmichaeln geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy AT fraylingtimothym geneobesogenicenvironmentinteractionsintheukbiobankstudy |