Cargando…

Do less populous countries receive more development assistance for health per capita? Longitudinal evidence for 143 countries, 1990–2014

BACKGROUND: Per capita allocation of overall development assistance has been shown to be biased towards countries with lower population size, meaning funders tend to provide proportionally less development assistance to countries with large populations. Individuals that happen to be part of large po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinsen, Lene, Ottersen, Trygve, Dieleman, Joseph L, Hessel, Philipp, Kinge, Jonas Minet, Skirbekk, Vegard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5838402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000528
_version_ 1783304251304312832
author Martinsen, Lene
Ottersen, Trygve
Dieleman, Joseph L
Hessel, Philipp
Kinge, Jonas Minet
Skirbekk, Vegard
author_facet Martinsen, Lene
Ottersen, Trygve
Dieleman, Joseph L
Hessel, Philipp
Kinge, Jonas Minet
Skirbekk, Vegard
author_sort Martinsen, Lene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Per capita allocation of overall development assistance has been shown to be biased towards countries with lower population size, meaning funders tend to provide proportionally less development assistance to countries with large populations. Individuals that happen to be part of large populations therefore tend to receive less assistance. However, no study has investigated whether this is also true regarding development assistance for health. We examined whether this so-called ‘small-country bias’ exists in the health aid sector. METHODS: We analysed the effect of a country’s population size on the receipt of development assistance for health per capita (in 2015 US$) among 143 countries over the period 1990–2014. Explanatory variables shown to be associated with receipt of development assistance for health were included: gross domestic product per capita, burden of disease, under-5 mortality rate, maternal mortality ratio, vaccination coverage (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) and fertility rate. We used the within-between regression analysis, popularised by Mundluck, as well as a number of robustness tests, including ordinary least squares, random-effects and fixed-effects regressions. RESULTS: Our results suggest there exists significant negative effect of population size on the amount of development assistance for health per capita countries received. According to the within-between estimator, a 1% larger population size is associated with a 0.4% lower per capita development assistance for health between countries (−0.37, 95% CI −0.45 to –0.28), and 2.3% lower per capita development assistance for health within countries (−2.29, 95% CI −3.86 to –0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that small-country bias exists within international health aid, as has been previously documented for aid in general. In a rapidly changing landscape of global health and development, the inclusion of population size in allocation decisions should be challenged on the basis of equitable access to healthcare and health aid effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5838402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58384022018-03-07 Do less populous countries receive more development assistance for health per capita? Longitudinal evidence for 143 countries, 1990–2014 Martinsen, Lene Ottersen, Trygve Dieleman, Joseph L Hessel, Philipp Kinge, Jonas Minet Skirbekk, Vegard BMJ Glob Health Research BACKGROUND: Per capita allocation of overall development assistance has been shown to be biased towards countries with lower population size, meaning funders tend to provide proportionally less development assistance to countries with large populations. Individuals that happen to be part of large populations therefore tend to receive less assistance. However, no study has investigated whether this is also true regarding development assistance for health. We examined whether this so-called ‘small-country bias’ exists in the health aid sector. METHODS: We analysed the effect of a country’s population size on the receipt of development assistance for health per capita (in 2015 US$) among 143 countries over the period 1990–2014. Explanatory variables shown to be associated with receipt of development assistance for health were included: gross domestic product per capita, burden of disease, under-5 mortality rate, maternal mortality ratio, vaccination coverage (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) and fertility rate. We used the within-between regression analysis, popularised by Mundluck, as well as a number of robustness tests, including ordinary least squares, random-effects and fixed-effects regressions. RESULTS: Our results suggest there exists significant negative effect of population size on the amount of development assistance for health per capita countries received. According to the within-between estimator, a 1% larger population size is associated with a 0.4% lower per capita development assistance for health between countries (−0.37, 95% CI −0.45 to –0.28), and 2.3% lower per capita development assistance for health within countries (−2.29, 95% CI −3.86 to –0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that small-country bias exists within international health aid, as has been previously documented for aid in general. In a rapidly changing landscape of global health and development, the inclusion of population size in allocation decisions should be challenged on the basis of equitable access to healthcare and health aid effectiveness. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5838402/ /pubmed/29515915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000528 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Martinsen, Lene
Ottersen, Trygve
Dieleman, Joseph L
Hessel, Philipp
Kinge, Jonas Minet
Skirbekk, Vegard
Do less populous countries receive more development assistance for health per capita? Longitudinal evidence for 143 countries, 1990–2014
title Do less populous countries receive more development assistance for health per capita? Longitudinal evidence for 143 countries, 1990–2014
title_full Do less populous countries receive more development assistance for health per capita? Longitudinal evidence for 143 countries, 1990–2014
title_fullStr Do less populous countries receive more development assistance for health per capita? Longitudinal evidence for 143 countries, 1990–2014
title_full_unstemmed Do less populous countries receive more development assistance for health per capita? Longitudinal evidence for 143 countries, 1990–2014
title_short Do less populous countries receive more development assistance for health per capita? Longitudinal evidence for 143 countries, 1990–2014
title_sort do less populous countries receive more development assistance for health per capita? longitudinal evidence for 143 countries, 1990–2014
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5838402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29515915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000528
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsenlene dolesspopulouscountriesreceivemoredevelopmentassistanceforhealthpercapitalongitudinalevidencefor143countries19902014
AT ottersentrygve dolesspopulouscountriesreceivemoredevelopmentassistanceforhealthpercapitalongitudinalevidencefor143countries19902014
AT dielemanjosephl dolesspopulouscountriesreceivemoredevelopmentassistanceforhealthpercapitalongitudinalevidencefor143countries19902014
AT hesselphilipp dolesspopulouscountriesreceivemoredevelopmentassistanceforhealthpercapitalongitudinalevidencefor143countries19902014
AT kingejonasminet dolesspopulouscountriesreceivemoredevelopmentassistanceforhealthpercapitalongitudinalevidencefor143countries19902014
AT skirbekkvegard dolesspopulouscountriesreceivemoredevelopmentassistanceforhealthpercapitalongitudinalevidencefor143countries19902014