Cargando…
Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is associated with maternal morbidity and mortality and has an increasing incidence in high-resource countries, despite dissemination of guidelines, introduction of skills training, and correction for risk factors. Current guidelines advise the administration,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5838856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29510717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2512-z |
_version_ | 1783304316461776896 |
---|---|
author | de Lange, Natascha Schol, Pim Lancé, Marcus Woiski, Mallory Langenveld, Josje Rijnders, Robbert Smits, Luc Wassen, Martine Henskens, Yvonne Scheepers, Hubertina |
author_facet | de Lange, Natascha Schol, Pim Lancé, Marcus Woiski, Mallory Langenveld, Josje Rijnders, Robbert Smits, Luc Wassen, Martine Henskens, Yvonne Scheepers, Hubertina |
author_sort | de Lange, Natascha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is associated with maternal morbidity and mortality and has an increasing incidence in high-resource countries, despite dissemination of guidelines, introduction of skills training, and correction for risk factors. Current guidelines advise the administration, as fluid resuscitation, of almost twice the amount of blood lost. This advice is not evidence-based and could potentially harm patients. METHODS: All women attending the outpatient clinic who are eligible will be informed of the study; oral and written informed consent will be obtained. Where there is more than 500 ml blood loss and ongoing bleeding, patients will be randomized to care as usual, fluid resuscitation with 1.5–2 times the amount of blood loss or fluid resuscitation with 0.75–1.0 times the blood loss. Blood loss will be assessed by weighing all draping. A blood sample, for determining hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, thrombocyte concentration, and conventional coagulation parameters will be taken at the start of the study, after 60 min, and 12–18 h after delivery. In a subgroup of women, additional thromboelastometric parameters will be obtained. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis is that massive fluid administration might lead to a progression of bleeding due to secondary coagulation disorders. In non-pregnant individuals with massive blood loss, restrictive fluid management has been shown to prevent a progression to dilution coagulopathy. These data, however, cannot be extrapolated to women in labor. Our objective is to compare both resuscitation protocols in women with early, mild PPH (blood loss 500–750 ml) and ongoing bleeding, taking as primary outcome measure the progression to severe PPH (blood loss > 1000 ml). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NTR 3789. Registered on 11 January 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2512-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5838856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58388562018-03-09 Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial de Lange, Natascha Schol, Pim Lancé, Marcus Woiski, Mallory Langenveld, Josje Rijnders, Robbert Smits, Luc Wassen, Martine Henskens, Yvonne Scheepers, Hubertina Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is associated with maternal morbidity and mortality and has an increasing incidence in high-resource countries, despite dissemination of guidelines, introduction of skills training, and correction for risk factors. Current guidelines advise the administration, as fluid resuscitation, of almost twice the amount of blood lost. This advice is not evidence-based and could potentially harm patients. METHODS: All women attending the outpatient clinic who are eligible will be informed of the study; oral and written informed consent will be obtained. Where there is more than 500 ml blood loss and ongoing bleeding, patients will be randomized to care as usual, fluid resuscitation with 1.5–2 times the amount of blood loss or fluid resuscitation with 0.75–1.0 times the blood loss. Blood loss will be assessed by weighing all draping. A blood sample, for determining hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, thrombocyte concentration, and conventional coagulation parameters will be taken at the start of the study, after 60 min, and 12–18 h after delivery. In a subgroup of women, additional thromboelastometric parameters will be obtained. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis is that massive fluid administration might lead to a progression of bleeding due to secondary coagulation disorders. In non-pregnant individuals with massive blood loss, restrictive fluid management has been shown to prevent a progression to dilution coagulopathy. These data, however, cannot be extrapolated to women in labor. Our objective is to compare both resuscitation protocols in women with early, mild PPH (blood loss 500–750 ml) and ongoing bleeding, taking as primary outcome measure the progression to severe PPH (blood loss > 1000 ml). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NTR 3789. Registered on 11 January 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2512-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5838856/ /pubmed/29510717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2512-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol de Lange, Natascha Schol, Pim Lancé, Marcus Woiski, Mallory Langenveld, Josje Rijnders, Robbert Smits, Luc Wassen, Martine Henskens, Yvonne Scheepers, Hubertina Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | restrictive versus massive fluid resuscitation strategy (refill study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5838856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29510717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2512-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delangenatascha restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT scholpim restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lancemarcus restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT woiskimallory restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT langenveldjosje restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rijndersrobbert restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT smitsluc restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wassenmartine restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT henskensyvonne restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT scheepershubertina restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |