Cargando…

Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is associated with maternal morbidity and mortality and has an increasing incidence in high-resource countries, despite dissemination of guidelines, introduction of skills training, and correction for risk factors. Current guidelines advise the administration,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Lange, Natascha, Schol, Pim, Lancé, Marcus, Woiski, Mallory, Langenveld, Josje, Rijnders, Robbert, Smits, Luc, Wassen, Martine, Henskens, Yvonne, Scheepers, Hubertina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5838856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29510717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2512-z
_version_ 1783304316461776896
author de Lange, Natascha
Schol, Pim
Lancé, Marcus
Woiski, Mallory
Langenveld, Josje
Rijnders, Robbert
Smits, Luc
Wassen, Martine
Henskens, Yvonne
Scheepers, Hubertina
author_facet de Lange, Natascha
Schol, Pim
Lancé, Marcus
Woiski, Mallory
Langenveld, Josje
Rijnders, Robbert
Smits, Luc
Wassen, Martine
Henskens, Yvonne
Scheepers, Hubertina
author_sort de Lange, Natascha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is associated with maternal morbidity and mortality and has an increasing incidence in high-resource countries, despite dissemination of guidelines, introduction of skills training, and correction for risk factors. Current guidelines advise the administration, as fluid resuscitation, of almost twice the amount of blood lost. This advice is not evidence-based and could potentially harm patients. METHODS: All women attending the outpatient clinic who are eligible will be informed of the study; oral and written informed consent will be obtained. Where there is more than 500 ml blood loss and ongoing bleeding, patients will be randomized to care as usual, fluid resuscitation with 1.5–2 times the amount of blood loss or fluid resuscitation with 0.75–1.0 times the blood loss. Blood loss will be assessed by weighing all draping. A blood sample, for determining hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, thrombocyte concentration, and conventional coagulation parameters will be taken at the start of the study, after 60 min, and 12–18 h after delivery. In a subgroup of women, additional thromboelastometric parameters will be obtained. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis is that massive fluid administration might lead to a progression of bleeding due to secondary coagulation disorders. In non-pregnant individuals with massive blood loss, restrictive fluid management has been shown to prevent a progression to dilution coagulopathy. These data, however, cannot be extrapolated to women in labor. Our objective is to compare both resuscitation protocols in women with early, mild PPH (blood loss 500–750 ml) and ongoing bleeding, taking as primary outcome measure the progression to severe PPH (blood loss > 1000 ml). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NTR 3789. Registered on 11 January 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2512-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5838856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58388562018-03-09 Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial de Lange, Natascha Schol, Pim Lancé, Marcus Woiski, Mallory Langenveld, Josje Rijnders, Robbert Smits, Luc Wassen, Martine Henskens, Yvonne Scheepers, Hubertina Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is associated with maternal morbidity and mortality and has an increasing incidence in high-resource countries, despite dissemination of guidelines, introduction of skills training, and correction for risk factors. Current guidelines advise the administration, as fluid resuscitation, of almost twice the amount of blood lost. This advice is not evidence-based and could potentially harm patients. METHODS: All women attending the outpatient clinic who are eligible will be informed of the study; oral and written informed consent will be obtained. Where there is more than 500 ml blood loss and ongoing bleeding, patients will be randomized to care as usual, fluid resuscitation with 1.5–2 times the amount of blood loss or fluid resuscitation with 0.75–1.0 times the blood loss. Blood loss will be assessed by weighing all draping. A blood sample, for determining hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, thrombocyte concentration, and conventional coagulation parameters will be taken at the start of the study, after 60 min, and 12–18 h after delivery. In a subgroup of women, additional thromboelastometric parameters will be obtained. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis is that massive fluid administration might lead to a progression of bleeding due to secondary coagulation disorders. In non-pregnant individuals with massive blood loss, restrictive fluid management has been shown to prevent a progression to dilution coagulopathy. These data, however, cannot be extrapolated to women in labor. Our objective is to compare both resuscitation protocols in women with early, mild PPH (blood loss 500–750 ml) and ongoing bleeding, taking as primary outcome measure the progression to severe PPH (blood loss > 1000 ml). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NTR 3789. Registered on 11 January 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2512-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5838856/ /pubmed/29510717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2512-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
de Lange, Natascha
Schol, Pim
Lancé, Marcus
Woiski, Mallory
Langenveld, Josje
Rijnders, Robbert
Smits, Luc
Wassen, Martine
Henskens, Yvonne
Scheepers, Hubertina
Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Restrictive Versus Massive Fluid Resuscitation Strategy (REFILL study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort restrictive versus massive fluid resuscitation strategy (refill study), influence on blood loss and hemostatic parameters in obstetric hemorrhage: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5838856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29510717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2512-z
work_keys_str_mv AT delangenatascha restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT scholpim restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lancemarcus restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT woiskimallory restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT langenveldjosje restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rijndersrobbert restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT smitsluc restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wassenmartine restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT henskensyvonne restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT scheepershubertina restrictiveversusmassivefluidresuscitationstrategyrefillstudyinfluenceonbloodlossandhemostaticparametersinobstetrichemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial