Cargando…

On the suitability of an allometric proxy for nondestructive estimation of average leaf dry weight in eelgrass shoots I: sensitivity analysis and examination of the influences of data quality, analysis method, and sample size on precision

BACKGROUND: The effects of current anthropogenic influences on eelgrass (Zostera marina) meadows are noticeable. Eelgrass ecological services grant important benefits for mankind. Preservation of eelgrass meadows include several transplantation methods. Evaluation of establishing success relies on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Echavarría-Heras, Héctor, Leal-Ramírez, Cecilia, Villa-Diharce, Enrique, Cazarez-Castro, Nohe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5838990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29510759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12976-018-0076-y
_version_ 1783304345161302016
author Echavarría-Heras, Héctor
Leal-Ramírez, Cecilia
Villa-Diharce, Enrique
Cazarez-Castro, Nohe
author_facet Echavarría-Heras, Héctor
Leal-Ramírez, Cecilia
Villa-Diharce, Enrique
Cazarez-Castro, Nohe
author_sort Echavarría-Heras, Héctor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effects of current anthropogenic influences on eelgrass (Zostera marina) meadows are noticeable. Eelgrass ecological services grant important benefits for mankind. Preservation of eelgrass meadows include several transplantation methods. Evaluation of establishing success relies on the estimation of standing stock and productivity. Average leaf biomass in shoots is a fundamental component of standing stock. Existing methods of leaf biomass measurement are destructive and time consuming. These assessments could alter shoot density in developing transplants. Allometric methods offer convenient indirect assessments of individual leaf biomass. Aggregation of single leaf projections produce surrogates for average leaf biomass in shoots. Involved parameters are time invariant, then derived proxies yield simplified nondestructive approximations. On spite of time invariance local factors induce relative variability of parameter estimates. This influences accuracy of surrogates. And factors like analysis method, sample size and data quality also impact precision. Besides, scaling projections are sensitive to parameter fluctuation. Thus the suitability of the addressed allometric approximations requires clarification. RESULTS: The considered proxies produced accurate indirect assessments of observed values. Only parameter estimates fitted from raw data using nonlinear regression, produced robust approximations. Data quality influenced sensitivity and sample size for an optimal precision. CONCLUSIONS: Allometric surrogates of average leaf biomass in eelgrass shoots offer convenient nondestructive assessments. But analysis method and sample size can influence accuracy in a direct manner. Standardized routines for data quality are crucial on granting cost-effectiveness of the method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5838990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58389902018-03-09 On the suitability of an allometric proxy for nondestructive estimation of average leaf dry weight in eelgrass shoots I: sensitivity analysis and examination of the influences of data quality, analysis method, and sample size on precision Echavarría-Heras, Héctor Leal-Ramírez, Cecilia Villa-Diharce, Enrique Cazarez-Castro, Nohe Theor Biol Med Model Research BACKGROUND: The effects of current anthropogenic influences on eelgrass (Zostera marina) meadows are noticeable. Eelgrass ecological services grant important benefits for mankind. Preservation of eelgrass meadows include several transplantation methods. Evaluation of establishing success relies on the estimation of standing stock and productivity. Average leaf biomass in shoots is a fundamental component of standing stock. Existing methods of leaf biomass measurement are destructive and time consuming. These assessments could alter shoot density in developing transplants. Allometric methods offer convenient indirect assessments of individual leaf biomass. Aggregation of single leaf projections produce surrogates for average leaf biomass in shoots. Involved parameters are time invariant, then derived proxies yield simplified nondestructive approximations. On spite of time invariance local factors induce relative variability of parameter estimates. This influences accuracy of surrogates. And factors like analysis method, sample size and data quality also impact precision. Besides, scaling projections are sensitive to parameter fluctuation. Thus the suitability of the addressed allometric approximations requires clarification. RESULTS: The considered proxies produced accurate indirect assessments of observed values. Only parameter estimates fitted from raw data using nonlinear regression, produced robust approximations. Data quality influenced sensitivity and sample size for an optimal precision. CONCLUSIONS: Allometric surrogates of average leaf biomass in eelgrass shoots offer convenient nondestructive assessments. But analysis method and sample size can influence accuracy in a direct manner. Standardized routines for data quality are crucial on granting cost-effectiveness of the method. BioMed Central 2018-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5838990/ /pubmed/29510759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12976-018-0076-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Echavarría-Heras, Héctor
Leal-Ramírez, Cecilia
Villa-Diharce, Enrique
Cazarez-Castro, Nohe
On the suitability of an allometric proxy for nondestructive estimation of average leaf dry weight in eelgrass shoots I: sensitivity analysis and examination of the influences of data quality, analysis method, and sample size on precision
title On the suitability of an allometric proxy for nondestructive estimation of average leaf dry weight in eelgrass shoots I: sensitivity analysis and examination of the influences of data quality, analysis method, and sample size on precision
title_full On the suitability of an allometric proxy for nondestructive estimation of average leaf dry weight in eelgrass shoots I: sensitivity analysis and examination of the influences of data quality, analysis method, and sample size on precision
title_fullStr On the suitability of an allometric proxy for nondestructive estimation of average leaf dry weight in eelgrass shoots I: sensitivity analysis and examination of the influences of data quality, analysis method, and sample size on precision
title_full_unstemmed On the suitability of an allometric proxy for nondestructive estimation of average leaf dry weight in eelgrass shoots I: sensitivity analysis and examination of the influences of data quality, analysis method, and sample size on precision
title_short On the suitability of an allometric proxy for nondestructive estimation of average leaf dry weight in eelgrass shoots I: sensitivity analysis and examination of the influences of data quality, analysis method, and sample size on precision
title_sort on the suitability of an allometric proxy for nondestructive estimation of average leaf dry weight in eelgrass shoots i: sensitivity analysis and examination of the influences of data quality, analysis method, and sample size on precision
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5838990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29510759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12976-018-0076-y
work_keys_str_mv AT echavarriaherashector onthesuitabilityofanallometricproxyfornondestructiveestimationofaverageleafdryweightineelgrassshootsisensitivityanalysisandexaminationoftheinfluencesofdataqualityanalysismethodandsamplesizeonprecision
AT lealramirezcecilia onthesuitabilityofanallometricproxyfornondestructiveestimationofaverageleafdryweightineelgrassshootsisensitivityanalysisandexaminationoftheinfluencesofdataqualityanalysismethodandsamplesizeonprecision
AT villadiharceenrique onthesuitabilityofanallometricproxyfornondestructiveestimationofaverageleafdryweightineelgrassshootsisensitivityanalysisandexaminationoftheinfluencesofdataqualityanalysismethodandsamplesizeonprecision
AT cazarezcastronohe onthesuitabilityofanallometricproxyfornondestructiveestimationofaverageleafdryweightineelgrassshootsisensitivityanalysisandexaminationoftheinfluencesofdataqualityanalysismethodandsamplesizeonprecision