Cargando…
Influence of image‐viewers and artifacts on implant length measurements in cone‐beam computed tomography: an in vitro study
This preclinical in vitro study compared the accuracy of implant lengths measured in two different image‐viewers, and examined whether implant‐induced artifacts affected the implant length measurements on CBCT images. A resin edentulous mandibular model, with multiple adjacent implants in the poster...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.18 |
_version_ | 1783304370940542976 |
---|---|
author | Vazquez, Lydia Srinivasan, Murali Khouja, Firas Combescure, Christophe Carrel, Jean‐Pierre |
author_facet | Vazquez, Lydia Srinivasan, Murali Khouja, Firas Combescure, Christophe Carrel, Jean‐Pierre |
author_sort | Vazquez, Lydia |
collection | PubMed |
description | This preclinical in vitro study compared the accuracy of implant lengths measured in two different image‐viewers, and examined whether implant‐induced artifacts affected the implant length measurements on CBCT images. A resin edentulous mandibular model, with multiple adjacent implants in the posterior segments, was acquired with a CBCT machine. In two different image‐viewers, two observers independently measured the implant length. Vertical measurements on CBCT images were carried out twice at each session, and repeated one week later. The results demonstrated no significant differences between actual and measured implant lengths. The differences in the mean error for vertical measurements using the two different image‐viewers (cross‐sectional images: OsiriX viewer = −0.01 ± 0.03 mm, NewTom viewer = −0.05 ± 0.09 mm, p‐value = 0.056; sagittal images: OsiriX viewer = −0.03 ± 0.04 mm; NewTom viewer = −0.04 ± 0.10 mm, p‐value = 0.24) were not statistically significant. This in vitro investigation suggests that the accuracy of implant length measurements on CBCT images was not influenced by image‐viewers or by the presence of implant‐induced artifacts. The presence of multiple adjacent implants in the posterior segments of the mandible is not likely to impact the measurements made between the implant apex and vital structures on CBCT images. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5839189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58391892018-05-09 Influence of image‐viewers and artifacts on implant length measurements in cone‐beam computed tomography: an in vitro study Vazquez, Lydia Srinivasan, Murali Khouja, Firas Combescure, Christophe Carrel, Jean‐Pierre Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles This preclinical in vitro study compared the accuracy of implant lengths measured in two different image‐viewers, and examined whether implant‐induced artifacts affected the implant length measurements on CBCT images. A resin edentulous mandibular model, with multiple adjacent implants in the posterior segments, was acquired with a CBCT machine. In two different image‐viewers, two observers independently measured the implant length. Vertical measurements on CBCT images were carried out twice at each session, and repeated one week later. The results demonstrated no significant differences between actual and measured implant lengths. The differences in the mean error for vertical measurements using the two different image‐viewers (cross‐sectional images: OsiriX viewer = −0.01 ± 0.03 mm, NewTom viewer = −0.05 ± 0.09 mm, p‐value = 0.056; sagittal images: OsiriX viewer = −0.03 ± 0.04 mm; NewTom viewer = −0.04 ± 0.10 mm, p‐value = 0.24) were not statistically significant. This in vitro investigation suggests that the accuracy of implant length measurements on CBCT images was not influenced by image‐viewers or by the presence of implant‐induced artifacts. The presence of multiple adjacent implants in the posterior segments of the mandible is not likely to impact the measurements made between the implant apex and vital structures on CBCT images. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5839189/ /pubmed/29744148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.18 Text en ©2016 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Vazquez, Lydia Srinivasan, Murali Khouja, Firas Combescure, Christophe Carrel, Jean‐Pierre Influence of image‐viewers and artifacts on implant length measurements in cone‐beam computed tomography: an in vitro study |
title | Influence of image‐viewers and artifacts on implant length measurements in cone‐beam computed tomography: an in vitro study |
title_full | Influence of image‐viewers and artifacts on implant length measurements in cone‐beam computed tomography: an in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Influence of image‐viewers and artifacts on implant length measurements in cone‐beam computed tomography: an in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of image‐viewers and artifacts on implant length measurements in cone‐beam computed tomography: an in vitro study |
title_short | Influence of image‐viewers and artifacts on implant length measurements in cone‐beam computed tomography: an in vitro study |
title_sort | influence of image‐viewers and artifacts on implant length measurements in cone‐beam computed tomography: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vazquezlydia influenceofimageviewersandartifactsonimplantlengthmeasurementsinconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy AT srinivasanmurali influenceofimageviewersandartifactsonimplantlengthmeasurementsinconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy AT khoujafiras influenceofimageviewersandartifactsonimplantlengthmeasurementsinconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy AT combescurechristophe influenceofimageviewersandartifactsonimplantlengthmeasurementsinconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy AT carreljeanpierre influenceofimageviewersandartifactsonimplantlengthmeasurementsinconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy |