Cargando…

Salivary intercellular adenosine triphosphate testing in primary caretakers: An examination of statistical significance versus diagnostic predictability

A primary caretaker is a potential reservoir of bacteria for an infant child and can be evaluated during a child's caries risk assessment. The aim of this study was to investigate an indirect method for assessing Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus (MS) and lactobacillus (LB) levels...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bill, Crystal, Danielson, Judy A., Jones, Robert S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.95
_version_ 1783304382580785152
author Bill, Crystal
Danielson, Judy A.
Jones, Robert S.
author_facet Bill, Crystal
Danielson, Judy A.
Jones, Robert S.
author_sort Bill, Crystal
collection PubMed
description A primary caretaker is a potential reservoir of bacteria for an infant child and can be evaluated during a child's caries risk assessment. The aim of this study was to investigate an indirect method for assessing Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus (MS) and lactobacillus (LB) levels in a caretaker's saliva. Thirty‐eight primary caretakers participated in the study to determine whether a 2‐step method to assess the intracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels in saliva (saliva i‐ATP method) predicted higher MS and LB levels. This method was tested against a 1‐step swab‐based total ATP testing of dental plaque (plaque t‐ATP method). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine the relationship between specificity and sensitivity of the two diagnostic tests. Although the area under the ROC curves of both the saliva i‐APT (0.823) and the plaque t‐ATP (0.774) methods were shown to be statistically different (p < .05) than the null hypothesis test of a random coin flip, the diagnostic predictability of the ATP tests to assess high levels of MS and LB remained low. The optimal cutoff, which was defined by the Youden index, for the saliva i‐ATP method produced a sensitivity/specificity of 60.7/100.0 for MS and 78.6/88.9 for LB. Applying these results to populations of low or high bacterial level prevalence produced undesirable positive and negative predictive values for future potential patients. A pair‐wise comparison of both area under the ROC curve values of the saliva i‐ATP and plaque t‐ATP did not find a statistically significant difference in using one test over the other (MS, p = .629; LB, p = .737). The findings of this study can educate dental clinicians that diagnostic tests, such as the 2‐step saliva i‐ATP method, can be found to be statistically significant but not ideal for patient use in terms of diagnostic predictability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5839252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58392522018-05-09 Salivary intercellular adenosine triphosphate testing in primary caretakers: An examination of statistical significance versus diagnostic predictability Bill, Crystal Danielson, Judy A. Jones, Robert S. Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles A primary caretaker is a potential reservoir of bacteria for an infant child and can be evaluated during a child's caries risk assessment. The aim of this study was to investigate an indirect method for assessing Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus (MS) and lactobacillus (LB) levels in a caretaker's saliva. Thirty‐eight primary caretakers participated in the study to determine whether a 2‐step method to assess the intracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels in saliva (saliva i‐ATP method) predicted higher MS and LB levels. This method was tested against a 1‐step swab‐based total ATP testing of dental plaque (plaque t‐ATP method). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine the relationship between specificity and sensitivity of the two diagnostic tests. Although the area under the ROC curves of both the saliva i‐APT (0.823) and the plaque t‐ATP (0.774) methods were shown to be statistically different (p < .05) than the null hypothesis test of a random coin flip, the diagnostic predictability of the ATP tests to assess high levels of MS and LB remained low. The optimal cutoff, which was defined by the Youden index, for the saliva i‐ATP method produced a sensitivity/specificity of 60.7/100.0 for MS and 78.6/88.9 for LB. Applying these results to populations of low or high bacterial level prevalence produced undesirable positive and negative predictive values for future potential patients. A pair‐wise comparison of both area under the ROC curve values of the saliva i‐ATP and plaque t‐ATP did not find a statistically significant difference in using one test over the other (MS, p = .629; LB, p = .737). The findings of this study can educate dental clinicians that diagnostic tests, such as the 2‐step saliva i‐ATP method, can be found to be statistically significant but not ideal for patient use in terms of diagnostic predictability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5839252/ /pubmed/29744207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.95 Text en ©2017 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bill, Crystal
Danielson, Judy A.
Jones, Robert S.
Salivary intercellular adenosine triphosphate testing in primary caretakers: An examination of statistical significance versus diagnostic predictability
title Salivary intercellular adenosine triphosphate testing in primary caretakers: An examination of statistical significance versus diagnostic predictability
title_full Salivary intercellular adenosine triphosphate testing in primary caretakers: An examination of statistical significance versus diagnostic predictability
title_fullStr Salivary intercellular adenosine triphosphate testing in primary caretakers: An examination of statistical significance versus diagnostic predictability
title_full_unstemmed Salivary intercellular adenosine triphosphate testing in primary caretakers: An examination of statistical significance versus diagnostic predictability
title_short Salivary intercellular adenosine triphosphate testing in primary caretakers: An examination of statistical significance versus diagnostic predictability
title_sort salivary intercellular adenosine triphosphate testing in primary caretakers: an examination of statistical significance versus diagnostic predictability
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.95
work_keys_str_mv AT billcrystal salivaryintercellularadenosinetriphosphatetestinginprimarycaretakersanexaminationofstatisticalsignificanceversusdiagnosticpredictability
AT danielsonjudya salivaryintercellularadenosinetriphosphatetestinginprimarycaretakersanexaminationofstatisticalsignificanceversusdiagnosticpredictability
AT jonesroberts salivaryintercellularadenosinetriphosphatetestinginprimarycaretakersanexaminationofstatisticalsignificanceversusdiagnosticpredictability