Cargando…
Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the existing literature on resective epilepsy surgery (RES) in older adults (≥60 years old) and examine seizure and neuropsychological outcomes in a single‐center large cohort of older adults undergoing RES and their comparison to a consecutive, younger (25‐ to45‐year‐old) ad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29588990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12099 |
_version_ | 1783304386140700672 |
---|---|
author | Punia, Vineet Abdelkader, Ahmed Busch, Robyn M. Gonzalez‐Martinez, Jorge Bingaman, William Najm, Imad Stojic, Andrey |
author_facet | Punia, Vineet Abdelkader, Ahmed Busch, Robyn M. Gonzalez‐Martinez, Jorge Bingaman, William Najm, Imad Stojic, Andrey |
author_sort | Punia, Vineet |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To summarize the existing literature on resective epilepsy surgery (RES) in older adults (≥60 years old) and examine seizure and neuropsychological outcomes in a single‐center large cohort of older adults undergoing RES and their comparison to a consecutive, younger (25‐ to45‐year‐old) adult population who underwent RES in routine clinical practice. METHODS: First, a comprehensive literature review was performed. Then, we identified older adults who underwent RES at our center (2000–2015). Outcome analysis was performed on patients who had ≥1 year of clinical follow‐up. A younger cohort of patients who underwent RES during the same period was selected for comparison. The 2 groups were compared with respect to demographic and disease variables as well as key clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Seizure outcomes on 58 older patients were reported in existing literature; 72% achieved Engel class I outcome ≥1 year postoperatively. Sixty‐four older adults underwent RES at our center, accounting for 2.8% of all RES during the study period. A total of 51 older adults (M(age) = 65) among them had ≥1‐year clinical follow‐up; 80% achieved Engel I outcome after a mean follow‐up of 3.2 years. This was comparable to the 68% Engel class I outcome among 50 consecutive younger adults, despite later age of onset, longer epilepsy duration, and more comorbidities (all p < 0.001) among older adults. The majority (86%) of older adults were referred to our center after years of suffering from drug‐resistant epilepsy. There were no group differences in surgical complications. However, 1 older adult passed away post‐RES. There was no difference in post‐RES neuropsychological outcomes compared to younger adults, except significantly higher number of older adults showed a decline in confrontational naming. SIGNIFICANCE: RES in well‐selected older adults is a safe and effective therapy, and advanced age should not preclude consideration of surgical therapy in older adults with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5839305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58393052018-03-27 Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older Punia, Vineet Abdelkader, Ahmed Busch, Robyn M. Gonzalez‐Martinez, Jorge Bingaman, William Najm, Imad Stojic, Andrey Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: To summarize the existing literature on resective epilepsy surgery (RES) in older adults (≥60 years old) and examine seizure and neuropsychological outcomes in a single‐center large cohort of older adults undergoing RES and their comparison to a consecutive, younger (25‐ to45‐year‐old) adult population who underwent RES in routine clinical practice. METHODS: First, a comprehensive literature review was performed. Then, we identified older adults who underwent RES at our center (2000–2015). Outcome analysis was performed on patients who had ≥1 year of clinical follow‐up. A younger cohort of patients who underwent RES during the same period was selected for comparison. The 2 groups were compared with respect to demographic and disease variables as well as key clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Seizure outcomes on 58 older patients were reported in existing literature; 72% achieved Engel class I outcome ≥1 year postoperatively. Sixty‐four older adults underwent RES at our center, accounting for 2.8% of all RES during the study period. A total of 51 older adults (M(age) = 65) among them had ≥1‐year clinical follow‐up; 80% achieved Engel I outcome after a mean follow‐up of 3.2 years. This was comparable to the 68% Engel class I outcome among 50 consecutive younger adults, despite later age of onset, longer epilepsy duration, and more comorbidities (all p < 0.001) among older adults. The majority (86%) of older adults were referred to our center after years of suffering from drug‐resistant epilepsy. There were no group differences in surgical complications. However, 1 older adult passed away post‐RES. There was no difference in post‐RES neuropsychological outcomes compared to younger adults, except significantly higher number of older adults showed a decline in confrontational naming. SIGNIFICANCE: RES in well‐selected older adults is a safe and effective therapy, and advanced age should not preclude consideration of surgical therapy in older adults with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5839305/ /pubmed/29588990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12099 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Full‐length Original Research Punia, Vineet Abdelkader, Ahmed Busch, Robyn M. Gonzalez‐Martinez, Jorge Bingaman, William Najm, Imad Stojic, Andrey Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older |
title | Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older |
title_full | Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older |
title_fullStr | Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older |
title_full_unstemmed | Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older |
title_short | Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older |
title_sort | time to push the age limit: epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older |
topic | Full‐length Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29588990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT puniavineet timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder AT abdelkaderahmed timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder AT buschrobynm timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder AT gonzalezmartinezjorge timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder AT bingamanwilliam timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder AT najmimad timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder AT stojicandrey timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder |