Cargando…

Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the existing literature on resective epilepsy surgery (RES) in older adults (≥60 years old) and examine seizure and neuropsychological outcomes in a single‐center large cohort of older adults undergoing RES and their comparison to a consecutive, younger (25‐ to45‐year‐old) ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Punia, Vineet, Abdelkader, Ahmed, Busch, Robyn M., Gonzalez‐Martinez, Jorge, Bingaman, William, Najm, Imad, Stojic, Andrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29588990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12099
_version_ 1783304386140700672
author Punia, Vineet
Abdelkader, Ahmed
Busch, Robyn M.
Gonzalez‐Martinez, Jorge
Bingaman, William
Najm, Imad
Stojic, Andrey
author_facet Punia, Vineet
Abdelkader, Ahmed
Busch, Robyn M.
Gonzalez‐Martinez, Jorge
Bingaman, William
Najm, Imad
Stojic, Andrey
author_sort Punia, Vineet
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To summarize the existing literature on resective epilepsy surgery (RES) in older adults (≥60 years old) and examine seizure and neuropsychological outcomes in a single‐center large cohort of older adults undergoing RES and their comparison to a consecutive, younger (25‐ to45‐year‐old) adult population who underwent RES in routine clinical practice. METHODS: First, a comprehensive literature review was performed. Then, we identified older adults who underwent RES at our center (2000–2015). Outcome analysis was performed on patients who had ≥1 year of clinical follow‐up. A younger cohort of patients who underwent RES during the same period was selected for comparison. The 2 groups were compared with respect to demographic and disease variables as well as key clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Seizure outcomes on 58 older patients were reported in existing literature; 72% achieved Engel class I outcome ≥1 year postoperatively. Sixty‐four older adults underwent RES at our center, accounting for 2.8% of all RES during the study period. A total of 51 older adults (M(age) = 65) among them had ≥1‐year clinical follow‐up; 80% achieved Engel I outcome after a mean follow‐up of 3.2 years. This was comparable to the 68% Engel class I outcome among 50 consecutive younger adults, despite later age of onset, longer epilepsy duration, and more comorbidities (all p < 0.001) among older adults. The majority (86%) of older adults were referred to our center after years of suffering from drug‐resistant epilepsy. There were no group differences in surgical complications. However, 1 older adult passed away post‐RES. There was no difference in post‐RES neuropsychological outcomes compared to younger adults, except significantly higher number of older adults showed a decline in confrontational naming. SIGNIFICANCE: RES in well‐selected older adults is a safe and effective therapy, and advanced age should not preclude consideration of surgical therapy in older adults with pharmacoresistant epilepsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5839305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58393052018-03-27 Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older Punia, Vineet Abdelkader, Ahmed Busch, Robyn M. Gonzalez‐Martinez, Jorge Bingaman, William Najm, Imad Stojic, Andrey Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: To summarize the existing literature on resective epilepsy surgery (RES) in older adults (≥60 years old) and examine seizure and neuropsychological outcomes in a single‐center large cohort of older adults undergoing RES and their comparison to a consecutive, younger (25‐ to45‐year‐old) adult population who underwent RES in routine clinical practice. METHODS: First, a comprehensive literature review was performed. Then, we identified older adults who underwent RES at our center (2000–2015). Outcome analysis was performed on patients who had ≥1 year of clinical follow‐up. A younger cohort of patients who underwent RES during the same period was selected for comparison. The 2 groups were compared with respect to demographic and disease variables as well as key clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Seizure outcomes on 58 older patients were reported in existing literature; 72% achieved Engel class I outcome ≥1 year postoperatively. Sixty‐four older adults underwent RES at our center, accounting for 2.8% of all RES during the study period. A total of 51 older adults (M(age) = 65) among them had ≥1‐year clinical follow‐up; 80% achieved Engel I outcome after a mean follow‐up of 3.2 years. This was comparable to the 68% Engel class I outcome among 50 consecutive younger adults, despite later age of onset, longer epilepsy duration, and more comorbidities (all p < 0.001) among older adults. The majority (86%) of older adults were referred to our center after years of suffering from drug‐resistant epilepsy. There were no group differences in surgical complications. However, 1 older adult passed away post‐RES. There was no difference in post‐RES neuropsychological outcomes compared to younger adults, except significantly higher number of older adults showed a decline in confrontational naming. SIGNIFICANCE: RES in well‐selected older adults is a safe and effective therapy, and advanced age should not preclude consideration of surgical therapy in older adults with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5839305/ /pubmed/29588990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12099 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Full‐length Original Research
Punia, Vineet
Abdelkader, Ahmed
Busch, Robyn M.
Gonzalez‐Martinez, Jorge
Bingaman, William
Najm, Imad
Stojic, Andrey
Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older
title Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older
title_full Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older
title_fullStr Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older
title_full_unstemmed Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older
title_short Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older
title_sort time to push the age limit: epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older
topic Full‐length Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29588990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12099
work_keys_str_mv AT puniavineet timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder
AT abdelkaderahmed timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder
AT buschrobynm timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder
AT gonzalezmartinezjorge timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder
AT bingamanwilliam timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder
AT najmimad timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder
AT stojicandrey timetopushtheagelimitepilepsysurgeryinpatients60yearsorolder