Cargando…

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence for the use of low‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Medline, and clinicaltrials.gov for all...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, Yonatan A., Pianka, Sean T., Alotaibi, Naif M., Babayan, Diana, Salavati, Bahar, Weil, Alexander G., Ibrahim, George M., Wang, Anthony C., Fallah, Aria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29588988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12092
_version_ 1783304387149430784
author Cooper, Yonatan A.
Pianka, Sean T.
Alotaibi, Naif M.
Babayan, Diana
Salavati, Bahar
Weil, Alexander G.
Ibrahim, George M.
Wang, Anthony C.
Fallah, Aria
author_facet Cooper, Yonatan A.
Pianka, Sean T.
Alotaibi, Naif M.
Babayan, Diana
Salavati, Bahar
Weil, Alexander G.
Ibrahim, George M.
Wang, Anthony C.
Fallah, Aria
author_sort Cooper, Yonatan A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence for the use of low‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Medline, and clinicaltrials.gov for all relevant articles. Relevant patient and stimulation predictors as well as seizure outcomes were assessed. For studies with and without individual participant data (IPD), the primary outcomes were the rate of “favorable response” (reduction in seizure frequency ≥50%) and pooled event rate of mean reduction in seizure frequency, respectively. Outcomes were assessed with comparative statistics and random‐effects meta‐analysis models. RESULTS: Of 3,477 identified articles, 12 met eligibility and were included in this review. We were able to obtain IPD for 5 articles constituting 34 participants. Univariate analysis on IPD identified greater favorable response event rates between participants with temporal seizure focus versus extratemporal (50% vs. 14%, p = 0.045) and between participants who were stimulated with a figure‐8 coil versus other types (47% vs. 0%, p = 0.01). We also performed study‐level meta‐analysis on the remaining 7 studies without IPD, which included 212 participants. The pooled mean event rate of 50% seizure reduction using low‐frequency rTMS was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12–57%). Sensitivity analysis revealed that studies with a mean age ≤21 years and studies using targeted stimulation had the highest seizure reduction rates compared to studies with a mean age >21 years (69% vs. 18%) and not using a targeted stimulation (47% vs. 14–20%). Moreover, we identified high interstudy heterogeneity, moderate study bias, and high publication bias. SIGNIFICANCE: Real‐world evidence suggests that low‐frequency rTMS using a figure‐8 coil may be an effective therapy for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy in pediatric patients. This meta‐analysis can inform the design and expedite recruitment of a subsequent randomized clinical trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5839309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58393092018-03-27 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence Cooper, Yonatan A. Pianka, Sean T. Alotaibi, Naif M. Babayan, Diana Salavati, Bahar Weil, Alexander G. Ibrahim, George M. Wang, Anthony C. Fallah, Aria Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence for the use of low‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Medline, and clinicaltrials.gov for all relevant articles. Relevant patient and stimulation predictors as well as seizure outcomes were assessed. For studies with and without individual participant data (IPD), the primary outcomes were the rate of “favorable response” (reduction in seizure frequency ≥50%) and pooled event rate of mean reduction in seizure frequency, respectively. Outcomes were assessed with comparative statistics and random‐effects meta‐analysis models. RESULTS: Of 3,477 identified articles, 12 met eligibility and were included in this review. We were able to obtain IPD for 5 articles constituting 34 participants. Univariate analysis on IPD identified greater favorable response event rates between participants with temporal seizure focus versus extratemporal (50% vs. 14%, p = 0.045) and between participants who were stimulated with a figure‐8 coil versus other types (47% vs. 0%, p = 0.01). We also performed study‐level meta‐analysis on the remaining 7 studies without IPD, which included 212 participants. The pooled mean event rate of 50% seizure reduction using low‐frequency rTMS was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12–57%). Sensitivity analysis revealed that studies with a mean age ≤21 years and studies using targeted stimulation had the highest seizure reduction rates compared to studies with a mean age >21 years (69% vs. 18%) and not using a targeted stimulation (47% vs. 14–20%). Moreover, we identified high interstudy heterogeneity, moderate study bias, and high publication bias. SIGNIFICANCE: Real‐world evidence suggests that low‐frequency rTMS using a figure‐8 coil may be an effective therapy for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy in pediatric patients. This meta‐analysis can inform the design and expedite recruitment of a subsequent randomized clinical trial. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5839309/ /pubmed/29588988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12092 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Full‐length Original Research
Cooper, Yonatan A.
Pianka, Sean T.
Alotaibi, Naif M.
Babayan, Diana
Salavati, Bahar
Weil, Alexander G.
Ibrahim, George M.
Wang, Anthony C.
Fallah, Aria
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence
title Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence
title_full Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence
title_fullStr Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence
title_full_unstemmed Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence
title_short Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence
title_sort repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence
topic Full‐length Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29588988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12092
work_keys_str_mv AT cooperyonatana repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforthetreatmentofdrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysisofrealworldevidence
AT piankaseant repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforthetreatmentofdrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysisofrealworldevidence
AT alotaibinaifm repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforthetreatmentofdrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysisofrealworldevidence
AT babayandiana repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforthetreatmentofdrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysisofrealworldevidence
AT salavatibahar repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforthetreatmentofdrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysisofrealworldevidence
AT weilalexanderg repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforthetreatmentofdrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysisofrealworldevidence
AT ibrahimgeorgem repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforthetreatmentofdrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysisofrealworldevidence
AT wanganthonyc repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforthetreatmentofdrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysisofrealworldevidence
AT fallaharia repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforthetreatmentofdrugresistantepilepsyasystematicreviewandindividualparticipantdatametaanalysisofrealworldevidence