Cargando…

Comparative Clinical Efficacy between Electrodesiccation with Curettage and Application of 80% Phenol Solution in Treatment of Common Warts

BACKGROUND: Common warts are skin diseases caused by human papillomavirus. Several treatment modalities available for common warts, two of them are electrodesiccation with curettage and application of 80% phenol solution. AIM: This study aims to compare clinical efficacy between these two modalities...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalimunthe, Dina Arwina, Siregar, Remenda, Tanjung, Chairiyah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Republic of Macedonia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29531597
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.074
_version_ 1783304413612343296
author Dalimunthe, Dina Arwina
Siregar, Remenda
Tanjung, Chairiyah
author_facet Dalimunthe, Dina Arwina
Siregar, Remenda
Tanjung, Chairiyah
author_sort Dalimunthe, Dina Arwina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Common warts are skin diseases caused by human papillomavirus. Several treatment modalities available for common warts, two of them are electrodesiccation with curettage and application of 80% phenol solution. AIM: This study aims to compare clinical efficacy between these two modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Open clinical trial was conducted at Dr Pirngadi General Hospital Medan and H. Adam Malik General Hospital Medan from February to June 2013 on 17 patients with multiple common warts. Both treatments began and applied simultaneously on the same day on each patient. RESULTS: Cure rate was higher in electrodesiccation with curettage (76.5%, 100%) compared to the application of 80% phenol solution (11.8%, 64.7%) on three weeks and six weeks of follow up. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference of common warts cure rate between electrodesiccation with curettage and application of 80% phenol solution after three weeks (p < 0.001) and six weeks (p = 0.018) of treatment. CONCLUSION: As a conclusion, electrodesiccation with curettage has higher cure rate than the application of 80% phenol solution on the treatment of common warts. Further study is needed to find out the best concentration and time interval for application of phenol solution to improve its clinical efficacy as an alternative treatment of choice for common warts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5839441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Republic of Macedonia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58394412018-03-12 Comparative Clinical Efficacy between Electrodesiccation with Curettage and Application of 80% Phenol Solution in Treatment of Common Warts Dalimunthe, Dina Arwina Siregar, Remenda Tanjung, Chairiyah Open Access Maced J Med Sci Clinical Science BACKGROUND: Common warts are skin diseases caused by human papillomavirus. Several treatment modalities available for common warts, two of them are electrodesiccation with curettage and application of 80% phenol solution. AIM: This study aims to compare clinical efficacy between these two modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Open clinical trial was conducted at Dr Pirngadi General Hospital Medan and H. Adam Malik General Hospital Medan from February to June 2013 on 17 patients with multiple common warts. Both treatments began and applied simultaneously on the same day on each patient. RESULTS: Cure rate was higher in electrodesiccation with curettage (76.5%, 100%) compared to the application of 80% phenol solution (11.8%, 64.7%) on three weeks and six weeks of follow up. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference of common warts cure rate between electrodesiccation with curettage and application of 80% phenol solution after three weeks (p < 0.001) and six weeks (p = 0.018) of treatment. CONCLUSION: As a conclusion, electrodesiccation with curettage has higher cure rate than the application of 80% phenol solution on the treatment of common warts. Further study is needed to find out the best concentration and time interval for application of phenol solution to improve its clinical efficacy as an alternative treatment of choice for common warts. Republic of Macedonia 2018-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5839441/ /pubmed/29531597 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.074 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Dina Arwina Dalimunthe, Remenda Siregar, Chairiyah Tanjung. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Dalimunthe, Dina Arwina
Siregar, Remenda
Tanjung, Chairiyah
Comparative Clinical Efficacy between Electrodesiccation with Curettage and Application of 80% Phenol Solution in Treatment of Common Warts
title Comparative Clinical Efficacy between Electrodesiccation with Curettage and Application of 80% Phenol Solution in Treatment of Common Warts
title_full Comparative Clinical Efficacy between Electrodesiccation with Curettage and Application of 80% Phenol Solution in Treatment of Common Warts
title_fullStr Comparative Clinical Efficacy between Electrodesiccation with Curettage and Application of 80% Phenol Solution in Treatment of Common Warts
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Clinical Efficacy between Electrodesiccation with Curettage and Application of 80% Phenol Solution in Treatment of Common Warts
title_short Comparative Clinical Efficacy between Electrodesiccation with Curettage and Application of 80% Phenol Solution in Treatment of Common Warts
title_sort comparative clinical efficacy between electrodesiccation with curettage and application of 80% phenol solution in treatment of common warts
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29531597
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.074
work_keys_str_mv AT dalimunthedinaarwina comparativeclinicalefficacybetweenelectrodesiccationwithcurettageandapplicationof80phenolsolutionintreatmentofcommonwarts
AT siregarremenda comparativeclinicalefficacybetweenelectrodesiccationwithcurettageandapplicationof80phenolsolutionintreatmentofcommonwarts
AT tanjungchairiyah comparativeclinicalefficacybetweenelectrodesiccationwithcurettageandapplicationof80phenolsolutionintreatmentofcommonwarts