Cargando…

Angulated Dental Implants in Posterior Maxilla FEA and Experimental Verification

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different implant angulations in posterior maxilla on stress distribution by finite element analysis and verify its results experimentally. METHODS: Two simplified models were prepared for an implant placed vertically and tilted 25° piercing the maxill...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamed, Hamed A., Marzook, Hamdy A., Ghoneem, Nahed E., El–Anwar, Mohamed I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Republic of Macedonia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29531612
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.077
_version_ 1783304417215250432
author Hamed, Hamed A.
Marzook, Hamdy A.
Ghoneem, Nahed E.
El–Anwar, Mohamed I.
author_facet Hamed, Hamed A.
Marzook, Hamdy A.
Ghoneem, Nahed E.
El–Anwar, Mohamed I.
author_sort Hamed, Hamed A.
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different implant angulations in posterior maxilla on stress distribution by finite element analysis and verify its results experimentally. METHODS: Two simplified models were prepared for an implant placed vertically and tilted 25° piercing the maxillary sinus. Geometric models’ components were prepared by Autodesk Inventor then assembled in ANSYS for finite element analysis. The results of finite element analysis were verified against experimental trials results which were statistically analysed using student t-test (level of significance p < 0.05). RESULTS: Implant - abutment complex absorbed the load energy in case of vertical implant better than the case of angulated one. That was reflected on cortical bone stress, while both cases showed stress levels within the physiological limits. Comparing results between FEA and experiment trials showed full agreement. CONCLUSION: It was found that the tilted implant by 25° can be utilised in the posterior region maxilla for replacing maxillary first molar avoiding sinus penetration. The implant-bone interface and peri-implant bones received the highest Von Mises stress. Implant - bone interface with angulated implant received about 66% more stresses than the straight one.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5839456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Republic of Macedonia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58394562018-03-12 Angulated Dental Implants in Posterior Maxilla FEA and Experimental Verification Hamed, Hamed A. Marzook, Hamdy A. Ghoneem, Nahed E. El–Anwar, Mohamed I. Open Access Maced J Med Sci Dental Science AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different implant angulations in posterior maxilla on stress distribution by finite element analysis and verify its results experimentally. METHODS: Two simplified models were prepared for an implant placed vertically and tilted 25° piercing the maxillary sinus. Geometric models’ components were prepared by Autodesk Inventor then assembled in ANSYS for finite element analysis. The results of finite element analysis were verified against experimental trials results which were statistically analysed using student t-test (level of significance p < 0.05). RESULTS: Implant - abutment complex absorbed the load energy in case of vertical implant better than the case of angulated one. That was reflected on cortical bone stress, while both cases showed stress levels within the physiological limits. Comparing results between FEA and experiment trials showed full agreement. CONCLUSION: It was found that the tilted implant by 25° can be utilised in the posterior region maxilla for replacing maxillary first molar avoiding sinus penetration. The implant-bone interface and peri-implant bones received the highest Von Mises stress. Implant - bone interface with angulated implant received about 66% more stresses than the straight one. Republic of Macedonia 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5839456/ /pubmed/29531612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.077 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Hamed A. Hamed, Hamdy A. Marzook, Nahed E. Ghoneem, Mohamed I. El-Anwar. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Dental Science
Hamed, Hamed A.
Marzook, Hamdy A.
Ghoneem, Nahed E.
El–Anwar, Mohamed I.
Angulated Dental Implants in Posterior Maxilla FEA and Experimental Verification
title Angulated Dental Implants in Posterior Maxilla FEA and Experimental Verification
title_full Angulated Dental Implants in Posterior Maxilla FEA and Experimental Verification
title_fullStr Angulated Dental Implants in Posterior Maxilla FEA and Experimental Verification
title_full_unstemmed Angulated Dental Implants in Posterior Maxilla FEA and Experimental Verification
title_short Angulated Dental Implants in Posterior Maxilla FEA and Experimental Verification
title_sort angulated dental implants in posterior maxilla fea and experimental verification
topic Dental Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29531612
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.077
work_keys_str_mv AT hamedhameda angulateddentalimplantsinposteriormaxillafeaandexperimentalverification
AT marzookhamdya angulateddentalimplantsinposteriormaxillafeaandexperimentalverification
AT ghoneemnahede angulateddentalimplantsinposteriormaxillafeaandexperimentalverification
AT elanwarmohamedi angulateddentalimplantsinposteriormaxillafeaandexperimentalverification