Cargando…

Comparison of the Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Microwave Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Patients with a Large Solitary or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinomas

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and prognostic factors associated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) versus TACE alone for a large solitary or multinodular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Lin, Li, Hai-Liang, Guo, Chen-Yang, Luo, Su-Xia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29520181
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.2.237
_version_ 1783304497663049728
author Zheng, Lin
Li, Hai-Liang
Guo, Chen-Yang
Luo, Su-Xia
author_facet Zheng, Lin
Li, Hai-Liang
Guo, Chen-Yang
Luo, Su-Xia
author_sort Zheng, Lin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and prognostic factors associated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) versus TACE alone for a large solitary or multinodular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study involved 258 patients with a large solitary or multinodular HCCs (not more than 10 tumors) who underwent TACE + MWA (n = 92) or TACE alone (n = 166) between July 2011 and April 2015. Local tumor control, survival outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups. Prognostic factors for time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 21.2 months (range, 4–45 months). The median TTP and OS were 12.5 months and 26.6 months, respectively, for the TACE + MWA group and 6.7 months and 17.1 months, respectively, for the TACE group (p < 0.001). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 85.9, 59.8, and 32.6%, respectively, for the TACE + MWA group and 59.0, 40.4, and 11.4%, respectively, for the TACE group (p < 0.001). The corresponding recurrence rates were 47.8, 78.3, and 94.6% for the TACE + MWA group, respectively, and 74.7, 96.4, and 97.6%, respectively, for the TACE group (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analyses showed that the treatment method, tumor size, and tumor number were significant prognostic factors for TTP and OS. CONCLUSION: TACE + MWA appears to have more advantages compared to TACE in prolonging OS, with a satisfactory TTP, for inpatients with solitary large or multinodular HCCs. Treatment method, tumor size, and tumor number are significant prognostic factors for TTP and OS. Further randomized, multi-center, prospective trials are required to confirm the findings of this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5840052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58400522018-03-08 Comparison of the Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Microwave Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Patients with a Large Solitary or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinomas Zheng, Lin Li, Hai-Liang Guo, Chen-Yang Luo, Su-Xia Korean J Radiol Intervention OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and prognostic factors associated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) versus TACE alone for a large solitary or multinodular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study involved 258 patients with a large solitary or multinodular HCCs (not more than 10 tumors) who underwent TACE + MWA (n = 92) or TACE alone (n = 166) between July 2011 and April 2015. Local tumor control, survival outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups. Prognostic factors for time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 21.2 months (range, 4–45 months). The median TTP and OS were 12.5 months and 26.6 months, respectively, for the TACE + MWA group and 6.7 months and 17.1 months, respectively, for the TACE group (p < 0.001). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 85.9, 59.8, and 32.6%, respectively, for the TACE + MWA group and 59.0, 40.4, and 11.4%, respectively, for the TACE group (p < 0.001). The corresponding recurrence rates were 47.8, 78.3, and 94.6% for the TACE + MWA group, respectively, and 74.7, 96.4, and 97.6%, respectively, for the TACE group (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analyses showed that the treatment method, tumor size, and tumor number were significant prognostic factors for TTP and OS. CONCLUSION: TACE + MWA appears to have more advantages compared to TACE in prolonging OS, with a satisfactory TTP, for inpatients with solitary large or multinodular HCCs. Treatment method, tumor size, and tumor number are significant prognostic factors for TTP and OS. Further randomized, multi-center, prospective trials are required to confirm the findings of this study. The Korean Society of Radiology 2018 2018-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5840052/ /pubmed/29520181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.2.237 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Intervention
Zheng, Lin
Li, Hai-Liang
Guo, Chen-Yang
Luo, Su-Xia
Comparison of the Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Microwave Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Patients with a Large Solitary or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinomas
title Comparison of the Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Microwave Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Patients with a Large Solitary or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinomas
title_full Comparison of the Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Microwave Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Patients with a Large Solitary or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinomas
title_fullStr Comparison of the Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Microwave Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Patients with a Large Solitary or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinomas
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Microwave Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Patients with a Large Solitary or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinomas
title_short Comparison of the Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Microwave Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Patients with a Large Solitary or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinomas
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and prognostic factors of transarterial chemoembolization plus microwave ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization alone in patients with a large solitary or multinodular hepatocellular carcinomas
topic Intervention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29520181
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.2.237
work_keys_str_mv AT zhenglin comparisonoftheefficacyandprognosticfactorsoftransarterialchemoembolizationplusmicrowaveablationversustransarterialchemoembolizationaloneinpatientswithalargesolitaryormultinodularhepatocellularcarcinomas
AT lihailiang comparisonoftheefficacyandprognosticfactorsoftransarterialchemoembolizationplusmicrowaveablationversustransarterialchemoembolizationaloneinpatientswithalargesolitaryormultinodularhepatocellularcarcinomas
AT guochenyang comparisonoftheefficacyandprognosticfactorsoftransarterialchemoembolizationplusmicrowaveablationversustransarterialchemoembolizationaloneinpatientswithalargesolitaryormultinodularhepatocellularcarcinomas
AT luosuxia comparisonoftheefficacyandprognosticfactorsoftransarterialchemoembolizationplusmicrowaveablationversustransarterialchemoembolizationaloneinpatientswithalargesolitaryormultinodularhepatocellularcarcinomas